Browser
|
| posted on 27/11/03 at 02:57 AM |
|
|
Costing worries
I decided a while ago I was going to build a Velocity Xt after having both visited the factory and the Luego stand at Donnington. I have since then
had some doubts as to the value for money aspect after looking at MK's website so last night I decided to to a cost comparison between the two.
I was pleased to see that, while the Velocity came out more expensive, it wasn't by much and havign viewed both kits, my opinion is that teh
Luego just edges out the MK in terms of chassis strength. THe major plus points in favour of the Luego are that they are on my doorstep and
that the Velocity Xt has the full width rear end (less hassle) and a tall bonnet which I will need to fit my tall engine under. Would anybody else
care to share their reasons for selecting a Luego?
|
|
|
|
|
Simon
|
| posted on 28/11/03 at 11:13 PM |
|
|
Browser,
I've only bought wishbones/tube etc from Luego, and been to their old premises a couple of times.
On both occassions I've been very happy with the service I've received, and if I had 15 grand to spend, they'd be building me a
Viento with a big V8 in it!!
ATB
Simon
|
|
|
Gazza
|
| posted on 9/12/03 at 01:56 PM |
|
|
I went for the Velocity over the Tiger Avon and MK based on...
1. What I'd read on this forum.
2. Quality of the parts and advice from Luego.
3. The look of the Velocity.
4. The Luego Team!
I'm sure cost did enter into the thinking at some point but to be honest - the kit component costs can be far outweighed by the stuff you buy to
build the kit with.
I didn't go down the donor car route and I've been buying as much stuff new or already reconditioned (kit fit @ Newark) - saves the hassle
but ups the price.
I wanted to build my Velocity to be (almost) a brand new car - so far this has increased the cost substantially - but its meant the car is built with
top quality parts!
Must say - This is my first escapade into Kit Cars and so far - its going well and I'm really pleased with the Velocity. 
Just a bag o' rusty spanners
|
|
|
Luego Sports Cars
|
| posted on 10/12/03 at 10:17 AM |
|
|
Thanks
Cheers Gazza, we are sure you have made the correct decision.
Would you mind if we use this on our web site?
Regards The Luego Team.
[Edited on 10/12/03 by Luego Sports Cars]
|
|
|
Findlay234
|
| posted on 10/12/03 at 11:05 AM |
|
|
I Bought my kit just as the velocity came out almost a year ago. Before the xt was produced, ive only spent £3000 on it and reckon another £1000
before its on the road. Its is more expensive than the mk but you do get what you pay for, i know a few mk owners who even agree with that.
|
|
|
Gazza
|
 posted on 10/12/03 at 05:23 PM |
|
|
More than welcome for you to use the comment on the web site..... ta.
Just a bag o' rusty spanners
|
|
|
Luego Sports Cars
|
| posted on 11/12/03 at 04:44 PM |
|
|
Cheers
|
|
|
DEAN C.
|
| posted on 14/12/03 at 03:41 PM |
|
|
I think a few things should be pointed out about the MK INDY.
The Indy also is full width(always has been)
Indy is designed to take the pinto(1" taller chassis)than book.
Stronger chassis? I havn't looked at the luego properly but I would have thought that they would be similar.
I think there is little to choose between the two companies,both have a good name for helping customers and quality of the products seems fine.
I am building an Indy and I cannot fault it but now the velocity has a full width rear I think that there is little to choose.
Remember! Both supplied Ron Champion with chassis frames(MK first)!
I'd say pick the nearest!
DEAN.........
|
|
|
ChrisW
|
| posted on 14/12/03 at 06:03 PM |
|
|
They are both very good cars but I think the Luego just edges ahead with regard to the final finish. My personal opinion was it was worth the few
quid extra but if you just want a car for minimum outlay there is little to fault the MK on.
Of course, I went for the Viento anyway which is another kettle of fish!
Chris
My gaff my rules
|
|
|
