Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: locost should it be V8 chevy or RS2000 16v ?
rallyslag

posted on 8/10/02 at 05:58 PM Reply With Quote
locost should it be V8 chevy or RS2000 16v ?

At the moment im trying to decide wich engine should go in which car

should i put the stage 1 rs2k(150bhp as standard + my mods) engine in my escort and chevy V8 in a yank tank locost?

or put the rs2k engine in the locost and find a home for a V8 possibly in the escort?





Old chinese proverb: "If a man speaks in a forest, and no woman hears him, is he still wrong?"

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Jasper

posted on 8/10/02 at 09:53 PM Reply With Quote
Ditch both and get a REAL engine - you know what I'm talking about!!
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
locodude

posted on 8/10/02 at 10:49 PM Reply With Quote
yes we do jasper, 1700 x-flow 234 cam, vulcan maxiflow BVH, steel posts, hepolite pistons etc.................
No, don't tell me you were going to say Japenese sewing machine engine.






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
rallyslag

posted on 9/10/02 at 01:56 AM Reply With Quote
no singer powered car thank you

there both more engine than any bike wanna be car every will be





Old chinese proverb: "If a man speaks in a forest, and no woman hears him, is he still wrong?"

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
interestedparty

posted on 9/10/02 at 06:49 AM Reply With Quote
Put the 4 cyl in the Locost and find another home for the V8. There are plenty of challenges for a Locost builder to overcome anyway, and the time and effort of installing an iron block chevy in a locost is unlikely to be rewarded by the outcome. All IMHO of course

John





As some day it may happen that a victim must be found,
I've got a little list-- I've got a little list
Of society offenders who might well be underground,
And who never would be missed-- who never would be missed!

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dunc

posted on 9/10/02 at 10:40 AM Reply With Quote
For it to be classed a real engine it has to have a 'V' before it and have double figure cylinders. Otherwise it'll just be a motor, you know the things found in hairdryers, Sinclair C5's and Pugs.

V12's the way to go, all the real cars hav em, Ferrari, Lambo and of course, Aston Martin.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Findlay234

posted on 9/10/02 at 11:10 AM Reply With Quote
id like to see you shoe horn a V12 into a locost, it'd have to be luegos new chassis to ever take it.

but hmmm, sinclair donor????? now hicost may have the fastest but what about the quietest...........?? thats got me thinking...

a 0-60 time of ............NEVER!

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
rallyslag

posted on 9/10/02 at 03:53 PM Reply With Quote
nah its gotta be the V8
much more fun than a 4cyl engine





Old chinese proverb: "If a man speaks in a forest, and no woman hears him, is he still wrong?"

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
sting

posted on 9/10/02 at 04:37 PM Reply With Quote
The only one spaeking any sense here is jasper!
Light engine sequential box and loads of revs
screaming in yer earhole no v8 can beat that
now runs and ducks for cover!!!
Sting

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
dashin_dave

posted on 9/10/02 at 06:06 PM Reply With Quote
hi ho..
with complete honesty, a worked 4 would be infinately easy to use, but IMHO its just like being a sheep, afterall, thats what everyone else uses. the v8 would be different, but its a bit unknown how it will drive. one important consideration is what your doing with your other car.. if this escort is something you drive every day, or even on a regular basis, GO WITH THE 4 in THAT... you've got to think... with the v8 you'll be looking at 15 mpg if your lucky, which will cost an absolutely prohibitive amount to run if its in something you drive often.
As for v12s, yea, they may work okey, but in reality, what v12 are you going to use in a locost??? the only one which is at all practical costwise would be the jag one, which will still cost a bomb to rebuild/hot up. and for what result, maybe 500bhp in the end, which you could get out of a 350 chev for a fraction of the cost

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
rallyslag

posted on 9/10/02 at 06:36 PM Reply With Quote
your right mate
its just that my mates keep calling me insane ect
but its nice to know there are enough crazy people out there to encourage me

V8 yank tank it is then

btw its not somthing ill use that often as its mostly a road legal track day car





Old chinese proverb: "If a man speaks in a forest, and no woman hears him, is he still wrong?"

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
johnston

posted on 9/10/02 at 09:57 PM Reply With Quote
while we,re debatin engines any one no about the german W engines cant remember if they're merc or veedubs






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dunc

posted on 9/10/02 at 10:37 PM Reply With Quote
I think it was audi that was working on the W12, two VR6 engines welded together. Might fit in a locost, would be short and prob not much wider than a V8. Unlike a Jag V12, 1m wide and 1m long. Only way that'd fit in a locost is if you sat where the engine should be and put the engine where you should sit.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Metal Hippy™

posted on 10/10/02 at 01:01 AM Reply With Quote
I know there is a W8 Passat on sale at selected dealerships. Just under 300bhp sounds familiar, but don't quote me on the power.

As for the W12, wasn't there a sportscar with that engine? I'd have thought it'd be VW, but Dunc may be right saying Audi produced it.

I'd have a 5 minute look on the net but really can't be arsed.

Somebody on here will know....





President of the Non-conformist Locost Builders Club. E-mail for details...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
rallyslag

posted on 10/10/02 at 08:14 AM Reply With Quote
the VW W12 pushing 660bhp





and then theres the bugatti W16 quad turbo pushing 1000bhp





here are the links to the pages about the cars
http://www.autointell.com/european_companies/volkswagen/vw_marke/vw-w12-coupe/volkswagen-w12-2002.htm
http://www.lambocars.com/related/bugatti2i.htm





Old chinese proverb: "If a man speaks in a forest, and no woman hears him, is he still wrong?"

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dunc

posted on 10/10/02 at 08:36 AM Reply With Quote
http://www.4wdonline.com/Audi/Show/2000.html
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Simon

posted on 10/10/02 at 09:22 AM Reply With Quote
Napier engine

W12, 24 litres, 5 mpg, 3000 rpm max

See

http://www.brooklands.org.uk/reunion/naprail.htm

for pics of a "proper" car. None of that Italian shite/ Would recommend viewing whole of site!!

VW ripping off other people ideas again (with the "W") like the narrow angle V in the VR6 was a ripoff of the Lancia Fulvia

All IMHO naturally

ATB

Simon

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dunc

posted on 10/10/02 at 11:16 AM Reply With Quote
Thats more like it Simon, Weir pump capacity and nowt miles to your gallon. An engine that looks like an engine and not something that the starship enterprise is likely to come up against.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
johnston

posted on 10/10/02 at 09:23 PM Reply With Quote
But where does the W come into things.

Dunc...When u say 2 vr6 engines welded to gether do you mean basically side by side in a vee formation???????? instead of weldin them end to end like they did in the old days






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
donut

posted on 11/10/02 at 06:32 AM Reply With Quote
Getting back on track......

Don't get me wrong, i LOVE V8's big time if only for the noise BUT it's all about power to weight ratio. If you put in a standard V8 the performance is not going to be alot different to a tuned 4pot jobby (except for the torque). If the V8 is highly tuned you will be spinning your wheels every time you pull away and the handling is going to be pretty awful i would think. I know someone with a V8 robin hood and he spins his wheels almost every time he pulls away and that's with a standard Rover V8.

Light yet powerful engines are best for locost type cars. Some would say that smaller cc engines like 1100 and 1300 are more fun because you have to actually work at driving the car especially round bendy roads. SO if you want motorway cruising then go with a V8 but i think IMHO you would be better off with the 4 cyl engine in the Locost.

V8 in the escort...nice!





Andy

When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/andywest1/

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Simon

posted on 11/10/02 at 08:55 AM Reply With Quote
Johnston,

I've posted a very, very rough layout (in pic archive)which should show you the "W" format.

Hope it helps

ATB

Simon

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.