Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: X-Flow back from Dyno
Blairm

posted on 14/3/09 at 07:59 PM Reply With Quote
X-Flow back from Dyno

Hi Guys,

Had my car back on the chasis dyno as the head had been off to have valve guides fixed and a couple of crock valves sorted. I had also added an Aldon Ignotor ignition.

Ran like a dog so I took it to the local rolling road tunner and they got it going nicely. Have not seen the bill but it took quite some time!!!

Anyway, it has come back with 100.5 BHP at the wheels (in NZ they do not seem to bother trying to estimate Flywheel BHP, but I guess this is about 125) at 5950 rpm. Torque was about 450-530 NM across the 4000-6000 range peaking around 4700.

It is running GT valves, 234 cam, twin 45's with 36mm chokes. Some porting as well.

Not sure of the exact compression ratio, but it will be nearer standard.

My questions are:

How do these torque figures compare to what people would expect?

Would I gain alot by going to custom or 1300 pistons to raise the CR in terms of HP and torque?

The dyno test stops at 6K, is this nornal? I regularly rev to near 7K and it keeps pulling. Could it be making at least the same if not more in the 6-7k range?

I was considering swapping to a 244 cam, but notice alot of ford guys on a South African discussion group seem to be using 254's. It really only goes on the road on a trailer these days and I am sprinting most of the time.

In my class (1300-1600) I am running near to the top, but some of the better Jap tintops with good 4AGE's still have legs on me and I think about 20 more HP would sort it.

A LSD would help as well

I also notice on the graph the A/F ratio between 2K and 3K is between 15 and 16, droiong to around 11 by 4500 and then jumping to relatively stable 12.5 to 13 through to 6K. Are these big variations normal? Is 16 dangerously lean?

Pick the car up on Tueday (1 more run to check some new heat range plugs) and keen to querry the tunner but wanted some advice first.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
clairetoo

posted on 14/3/09 at 08:09 PM Reply With Quote
Theres something amiss with those torque figures - 530 NM equates to 390 foot/pounds
My last crossflow made 165 ft/lb's jst under 4000 - but it did have throttle bodies/distributerless and a much wilder spec





Its cuz I is blond , innit

Claire xx

Will weld for food......

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Blairm

posted on 14/3/09 at 08:17 PM Reply With Quote
Yes, You are on to something there. Reread my graph and I may be wrong at 530 peak, more like 505, but the label says Nm. I read another post about a pinto that had much lower figures to.

Could it be something to do with "at the wheels" ?

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
dinosaurjuice

posted on 14/3/09 at 08:22 PM Reply With Quote
430nm at 6000rpm is about 350 hp

its definately measured at wheels...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Blairm

posted on 14/3/09 at 08:42 PM Reply With Quote
350HP, I'll take that

This companies bread and butter is tunning Chev LS1 and LS2. Maybe my crosslfow is to powerfull for it LOL

As an aside he had a brand new 6.0 litre Chev sitting there and the tape measure suggested it would fit with a dry sump. Any one keen?

Anyway, looks like his machine is very screwy. Hope the HP is also not 3 time over estimated!!!

Sheet attached for your interest.

Any comments on Cam choice and 1300 pisotns anyone? Rescued attachment Dyno Sheet.JPG
Rescued attachment Dyno Sheet.JPG

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
turboben

posted on 14/3/09 at 10:04 PM Reply With Quote
Just guessing but maybe the torque figures are at the wheels after the gears have increased the torque. If you knew what gear was used you could work out a rough flywheel torque figure with a calculator.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
clairetoo

posted on 14/3/09 at 10:05 PM Reply With Quote
My thoughts.......a wilder cam would help at higher revs ( I prefer the 244 ) , and the biggest valves you can find ( 1 5/8 inlet , 1 3/8 exhaust work well )
A compression hike will help - go for the 1300 pistons , but be sure to deepen the valve pockets )
That sort of setup will happily rev to 8000 - my horsepower was still climbing when the rev-limiter cut in at 8 )
Are you allowed fuel injection in the class you run ? If so , go for throttle bodies and dump the distributor and it will still be drivable and economical .

[Edited on 14/3/09 by clairetoo]





Its cuz I is blond , innit

Claire xx

Will weld for food......

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Blairm

posted on 14/3/09 at 11:01 PM Reply With Quote
Thanks Claireetoo,

At moment can run anything in sprints. It is not limited, but I plan to run classics and need to stay standardish. Otherwise I would og Toyota 4age or may Nissan SR20.

I would love to through the webbers as they are so expensive to get set up and running our of people who still familiar with the art.

Thanks Blair

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
clairetoo

posted on 14/3/09 at 11:13 PM Reply With Quote
So............how about a megajolt , with the coilpack where the distributor used to live ( so the plug leads will still appear to come from a dizzy...)
That will improve both torque and high RPM power.....





Its cuz I is blond , innit

Claire xx

Will weld for food......

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Blairm

posted on 14/3/09 at 11:20 PM Reply With Quote
I think Electronic iginition is OK, but they expect it to still have a distributor. Do you have a photo of this set up.

Never seen a MegaJolt in New Zealand. Not common over here.?

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
thunderace

posted on 14/3/09 at 11:30 PM Reply With Quote
twin 45's with 36mm chokes.

twin 40s for a xflow 1600-1700 with 34 chokes max .
you should be geting around 135bhp with 1300cc pistons fitted and big 34mm and 41.3mm valves.and a 234 cam

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
clairetoo

posted on 14/3/09 at 11:39 PM Reply With Quote
WOW That supercharger setup looks awesome - although there may be a slight bonnet clearance issue





Its cuz I is blond , innit

Claire xx

Will weld for food......

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Blairm

posted on 15/3/09 at 12:26 AM Reply With Quote
Bonnet clearance as well as visability issues!!!

How well did the supercharger go?

Not a lot of room between the valve seats in that photo.

Ive got 39.2mm inlets and 33.7mm exhausts at the present and there is a little meat left between them, so some room to improve. Looks like from the photo it will be more likely to crack though? Your experince?

So if good valves, 234 cam and 1300 pistons will give you 135, a 244 will be a little better again I guess

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
clairetoo

posted on 15/3/09 at 12:36 AM Reply With Quote
I've had a few cracks in heads - both between the valves and fron valve seats to plug threads
TBO not really a problem - they crack , you re-cut the seat - and the crack gets no bigger and causes no real problems (IMHO).
The 244 is a great cam - really lets it rev





Its cuz I is blond , innit

Claire xx

Will weld for food......

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.