MikeRJ
|
| posted on 16/9/09 at 09:07 PM |
|
|
Spot the manufacturer
Some talk of this
MKaterham? on PH.
Looks like a Caterham in most respects, and advertised as one, but front suspension is MK (or looks like it) and car is registered as an "M
K". Anyone know anything about this car? (other than is seems a bit dodgy!)
EDIT Sorry, link now fixed!
[Edited on 16/9/09 by MikeRJ]
|
|
|
|
|
200mph
|
| posted on 16/9/09 at 09:15 PM |
|
|
link not working for me 
If it isn't broke, fix it until it is
|
|
|
PAUL FISHER
|
| posted on 16/9/09 at 09:17 PM |
|
|
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=30&t=747553&mid=114487&nmt=Can%20anyone%20identify%20this%20Seven?
[Edited on 19/05/04 by PAUL FISHER]
|
|
|
zilspeed
|
| posted on 16/9/09 at 09:18 PM |
|
|
MK Locost ?
Cortina Hubs suggest so to me anyway.
|
|
|
MikeRJ
|
| posted on 16/9/09 at 09:27 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by 200mph
link not working for me
Whoops, that's what happens when you combine a big fingered fool and a small keyboard on a netbook!
|
|
|
omega0684
|
| posted on 16/9/09 at 09:30 PM |
|
|
its a 1.6 crossflow and its advertised as a pinto cross flow !
[Edited on 16/9/09 by omega0684]
|
|
|
LBMEFM
|
| posted on 16/9/09 at 09:33 PM |
|
|
DVLA have it listed as a MK Sports as Mike says. Barry
[Edited on 16/9/09 by LBMEFM]
|
|
|
200mph
|
| posted on 16/9/09 at 09:40 PM |
|
|
I wonder how much the current owner paid for it....
If it isn't broke, fix it until it is
|
|
|
SeaBass
|
| posted on 16/9/09 at 09:42 PM |
|
|
Early MK lower wishbones which bend. Lolocost xflow manifold which exits high up the panel. There are a quite a few Cateringvan parts on it
though....
JC
|
|
|
MikeRJ
|
| posted on 16/9/09 at 09:50 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by SeaBass
Early MK lower wishbones which bend. Lolocost xflow manifold which exits high up the panel. There are a quite a few Cateringvan parts on it
though....
JC
The transmission tunnel is definitely Caterham. Can't help but wonder if we have a cut and shut special here? MK front end on a Caterham
chassis, and the MK registration details.
|
|
|
tomprescott
|
| posted on 16/9/09 at 09:52 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by omega0684
its a 1.6 crossflow and its advertised as a pinto cross flow !
[Edited on 16/9/09 by omega0684]
Don't tell me in all the years of experience you have you've never heard of the pinto crossflow? Next you'll tell me you
haven't even heard of the zetec cologne!
|
|
|
MikeRJ
|
| posted on 16/9/09 at 09:55 PM |
|
|
Even the BlatChat chaps are a bit puzzled!
|
|
|
mookaloid
|
| posted on 16/9/09 at 10:29 PM |
|
|
I'm not sure if they are MK bones - the overhead picture of the engine bay shows a view of one of them and they don't look like Indy Bones
at any rate..
"That thing you're thinking - it wont be that."
|
|
|
SeaBass
|
| posted on 17/9/09 at 06:59 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by mookaloid
I'm not sure if they are MK bones - the overhead picture of the engine bay shows a view of one of them and they don't look like Indy Bones
at any rate..
They're early MK Locost wishbones which are not of a large enough tube diameter or wall thickness. I used these when I built my car. Fair play
to Martin Keenan he replaced them FOC with much stronger items when I bent them 
[Edited on 17/9/09 by SeaBass]
|
|
|
