Poll: which mk2 rack [View Results]
brand new standard rack
brand new 2.9 quick rack
recondition 2.4 quick rack



Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: which mk2 rack
gavin174

posted on 29/9/09 at 09:10 PM Reply With Quote
which mk2 rack

need your views please...

have a locost chassis with widetrack and unsure what mk2 escort rack to use...

so i now have 3...

car will be used mainly on the road with some sprint trackdays..

please help!!!

[Edited on 29/9/09 by gavin174]

[Edited on 29/9/09 by gavin174]





http://www.essexkitcarclub.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
t16turbotone

posted on 29/9/09 at 09:28 PM Reply With Quote
I have a wide mcsorley chassis, ime currently using standard escort item, personally i feel i need the 2.4 rack
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
adithorp

posted on 29/9/09 at 09:30 PM Reply With Quote
This is the general advise I got when asking the same thing.

Standard is too light, too many turns.
2.4 too twitchy on the road but perfect on track.
2.9 best balance for road and track.

adrian





"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire

http://jpsc.org.uk/forum/

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
StevieB

posted on 29/9/09 at 09:45 PM Reply With Quote
I've just gone for a 2.8 for my sierra rack.

I could almost get away woth a standard rack but there's just a tiny amount too much lock for some of the tighter turns on trackdays - 2.8 should solve that but still allow enough precision to place the car properly on track without suffering any twitchiness.

Having said that, my mate uses the quikest rack Caterham do on his se7en and it's pretty perfect (1.8 turn IIRC).

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
procomp

posted on 30/9/09 at 07:25 AM Reply With Quote
Hi

with the Escort racks you will find that a STD travel and ratio is virtually useless.

The other options are a very rare Quaife 1.9 or a more common 2.2. Other rack manufacturers do 2.4 ratio as a quick rack. These are generally a 30% ratio increase. There are some 2.9 lock to lock racks around but these are STD ratio with lock stops fitted so no benefit over a STD rack just less travel.
The worst rack of the lot is the genuine Westfield item thats made by QH. That has reduced lock by not having the rack bar machined as far to give less travel rather than lock stops fitted. It is sold as a quick rack but is actualy only an 18% increase in ratio.

In general a 2.4 is a good option for road and track use. A 2.2 or 1.9 are better suited to just track use.

Cheers Matt






View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
gavin174

posted on 30/9/09 at 09:22 AM Reply With Quote
thanks for your replies..

as always you never get a 100 percent answer.. joins of individuals oppion i suppose..

maybe i should keep all 3 till its on the road and see from there

cheers





http://www.essexkitcarclub.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
adithorp

posted on 30/9/09 at 12:16 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by procomp
Hi

with the Escort racks you will find that a STD travel and ratio is virtually useless.

The other options are a very rare Quaife 1.9 or a more common 2.2. Other rack manufacturers do 2.4 ratio as a quick rack. These are generally a 30% ratio increase. There are some 2.9 lock to lock racks around but these are STD ratio with lock stops fitted so no benefit over a STD rack just less travel.
The worst rack of the lot is the genuine Westfield item thats made by QH. That has reduced lock by not having the rack bar machined as far to give less travel rather than lock stops fitted. It is sold as a quick rack but is actualy only an 18% increase in ratio.

In general a 2.4 is a good option for road and track use. A 2.2 or 1.9 are better suited to just track use.

Cheers Matt


My 2.9 is deffinatly a lower ratio than standard and had no lock stops fitted. I know because I had a standard (3.5?) rack to compare it with that I had decided not to use.

adrian





"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire

http://jpsc.org.uk/forum/

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
procomp

posted on 30/9/09 at 12:58 PM Reply With Quote
Hi

They do not necessarily have lock stops added as an extra fitment on the ends. They don't machine the rack bar the same distance / length as per the Westfield STD item.

Cheers Matt






View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
adithorp

posted on 1/10/09 at 02:16 PM Reply With Quote
...but when I compared my 2.9 with the standard one, it travelled the same distance but with less than3 turns compared to over 3.5 turns.
I don't doubt that there are some like you say, or even them all possibly being like that now, but the one I have isn't.

adrian





"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire

http://jpsc.org.uk/forum/

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.