scootz
|
 posted on 9/10/09 at 07:34 AM |
|
|
Cheetah is Back... I'm in Love!
Maybe it's just me, but I love this... CHEETAH!
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Whippy
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 07:36 AM |
|
|
Bi^chin...apart from the price 
Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet
|
|
|
mackei23b
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 07:37 AM |
|
|
Looks very stringray ish ,I like to!
|
|
|
scootz
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 07:41 AM |
|
|
Woo-hoo... a short YouTube clip - CHEETAH!
I WANT ONE (better put the lottery on!).
|
|
|
Davey D
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 07:42 AM |
|
|
Oooh have to agree, that is very nice!
|
|
|
02GF74
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 07:54 AM |
|
|
It has a very short wheelbase because the propshaft was eliminated to save weight, and the gearbox output bolts directly to the rear differential
because the engine is set so far back.
looks like a pig to get in and out thjough.
It has been availalbe in kit car form, probably for a lot less £££ but still more than £ 250. A lot more.
|
|
|
carpmart
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 08:11 AM |
|
|
I really, no correction, I REALLY like that! 
You only live once - make the most of it!
Radical Clubsport, Kwaker motor
'94 MX5 MK1, 1.8
F10 M5 - 600bhp Daily Hack
Range Rover Sport - Wife's Car
Mercedes A class - Son's Car
|
|
|
Humbug
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 09:19 AM |
|
|
It looks really hard... interesting that it seems like you would sit between the rear wheels!
|
|
|
steve m
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 09:37 AM |
|
|
looks like you could add another V8 in the front
|
|
|
alistairolsen
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 09:41 AM |
|
|
There's more than a touch of E-type in there.
Stunning car with some interesting bits of design!
Far too expensive for what it is tho, it's not historic, nor genuine. Nor will it in any way be better than it's modern rivals. It's
a car you buy just 'cos.
My Build Thread
|
|
|
pewe
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 09:51 AM |
|
|
"No propshaft, gearbox bolts straight onto the diff...." just doesn't seem right to me. At least you don't have to worry
about a propshaft retainer!
Means you are literally sitting on top of the diff and by the look of it the fuel tank as well. Certainly wouldn't like to go off backwards into
a hinkelstein (a la M5 at Bovingdon).
Too scary for me by far.
Cheers, Pewe
|
|
|
nick205
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 09:54 AM |
|
|
Oh bugger - I've wreked my shorts!
That is just boootiful
|
|
|
flak monkey
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 10:08 AM |
|
|
Niiiice
Sera
http://www.motosera.com
|
|
|
iscmatt
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 11:13 AM |
|
|
and another of it on the track SHORT CLIP
|
|
|
BenB
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 12:16 PM |
|
|
Like it apart from the headlights. I agree Jag E type meets Stingray....
|
|
|
02GF74
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 02:56 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by pewe
Means you are literally sitting on top of the fuel tank as well.
3.5 million Series Land Rovers owners say it is not that bad, except for the frazzled ones ofcourse.
Never heard of the underseat fuel tanks giving any trouble, apart from rustng due to age.
|
|
|
PAUL FISHER
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 03:58 PM |
|
|
And a video of the original 1964 car
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jyrcv2xiNOw
|
|
|
Staple balls
|
| posted on 9/10/09 at 11:18 PM |
|
|
Want.
|
|
|
Ninehigh
|
| posted on 10/10/09 at 10:53 AM |
|
|
YEAH!!
How long until the kitcar plans are out?
|
|
|
.jpg){kind=avatar}
