Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Rear Cylinder Size
johnemms

posted on 5/3/12 at 10:52 AM Reply With Quote
Rear Cylinder Size

Ok.. IVA says no brake adjusting valves allowed..

M16 calipers front - Escort Master Cyl - 8'' rear drums Escort Mk2 Axle.

I have found 3 rear Mk2 Escort cylinder bores available:

BWC 5080 20.6mm (which I think I have)
BWC 5090 19.0mm
BWC 5084 17.8mm

I may have fitted a pair or even worse - odd cylinders during the build up ..

If I fit a pair of small bore 17.8mm - It should reduce the chance of rear lock up at IVA

Does anyone know of other sizes?
cheers
jon

[Edited on 5/3/12 by johnemms]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
wicket

posted on 5/3/12 at 11:46 AM Reply With Quote
I have M16 on the front and 8" drums on a Cortina axle at the rear and the cylinders are 0.65" dia front and 0.7" dia rear and they work fine.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 5/3/12 at 11:47 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by wicket
I have M16 on the front and 8" drums on a Cortina axle at the rear and the cylinders are 0.65" dia front and 0.7" dia rear and they work fine.


I think hes talking aboout the rear wheel cylinders, not the master cylinders?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 5/3/12 at 11:59 AM Reply With Quote
Wheel cylinder sizes make more sense in imperial sizes

17.8mm = 0.7"
19mm = 3/4"
20.6m = 13/16"

BWC 5084 20.6mm 0.7" should give you a good safety margin as O.7" was more or less the standard size on most RWD small cars in the 1960's and 70's which used P14 calipers on the front.



***** edit ******

Post should read BWC 5084 17.8mm 0.7" should give you a good safety margin as O.7" was more or less the standard size on most RWD small cars in the 1960's and 70's which used P14 calipers on the front.

My own blood fault posted when rush to go out.

[Edited on 5/3/12 by britishtrident]





[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dusty

posted on 5/3/12 at 01:11 PM Reply With Quote
Isn't the rule, for a given effort on the pedal:

The smaller the bore of the master cylinder the more power to the pads/shoes.
The smaller the bore of the wheel cylinder the less power applied to the shoes.

I get confused easily by things like this.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
johnemms

posted on 5/3/12 at 01:56 PM Reply With Quote
Rear brake slave cylinder:

Smaller bore - reduce pressure on shoe - reduce pedal travel - reduce rear lockup

Bigger bore - more fluid surface area - increases shoe pressure - increases pedal travel - more rear bite..

Got a pair of these 17.8mm to try out : eBay - The UK's Online Marketplace

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
pstirz

posted on 17/11/13 at 09:21 PM Reply With Quote
Thanks for your help

I have replaced the 20.6mm rear cylinders with 17.8mm and I have a Mondeo bias valve in the post. I think a combination of both will do the trick for my retest on the 29th November.

Thanks again for all your help.


View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
johnemms

posted on 17/11/13 at 09:34 PM Reply With Quote
Yep i passed easy with M16 front calipers & 8" drums small bore rear cylinders





Own chassis & Build - First time pass!!
"7's" aren't really "cars", they are 'experiences"

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.