Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Exhaust header design
rincewind23

posted on 11/8/14 at 07:12 PM Reply With Quote
Exhaust header design

Hi all,

I am just working on mocking up the exhaust headers for my Rover v8. Following a couple of weeks of googling, I am working with 40mm OD plumbing pipe since most of the pages I found said that is the diameter that the metal headers should be. I've made the merge collector with a 50mm exit hole but that's not a fixed dimension right now (just how it happened to turn out)

Basically, I'm hoping the collective genius of the forums can give me some input on whether this header design looks ok? I'm not looking for equal-length headers or something that'll give me uber performance, but equally I'm not looking for something that's going to make the engine run really badly.

I posted this question on another forum as well - I'm just trying to get as many smart people as possible to give feedback

Cheers,
Kev.


View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mark chandler

posted on 11/8/14 at 07:49 PM Reply With Quote
That will give you what you want, if you take the two rear cylinders to the outside you will get more equal lengths with the same amount of effort.

Regards Mark

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 11/8/14 at 07:58 PM Reply With Quote
Any reason for the double tight 90s rather than one smooth larger radius?





Mistral Motorsport

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
rincewind23

posted on 11/8/14 at 08:04 PM Reply With Quote
Thanks, guys!

Mark: Nice idea - closer to equal length without any extra hassle

loggyboy: I was trying to get the pipes to exit the body as close as possbile, to minimise the hole in the bodywork - I could only find those 90 degree bends in plastic, but hope to replace any 90's with 2.5D stainless bends

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
maccmike

posted on 11/8/14 at 08:08 PM Reply With Quote
Im sure you can get nice curves as the design goes on.
Working from left to right as 1-4;
Keep 1 where it is.
2- to the left of 1.
3- above 2.
and 1 to the right of 2.
That will equal your lengths more.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 11/8/14 at 08:39 PM Reply With Quote
I'd keep the bends to min when you make it for real, larger radius as pos.





Mistral Motorsport

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
designer

posted on 12/8/14 at 07:57 AM Reply With Quote
I tend to use plastic flexible tube to dummy rig exhausts. It give better curves and give a true length of the pipes.
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mr Whippy

posted on 12/8/14 at 11:45 AM Reply With Quote
you can heat the white plastic pipe with a hot air gun as it becomes quite flexible, quite easy to do, just wear welding gloves
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Fred W B

posted on 12/8/14 at 05:46 PM Reply With Quote
I think you are going to end up doing the exercise twice, as the bends you find will not have the sharp radius of the plastic elbows. Get the steel parts and start with them. This based on my experience making these for my Rover V8.



Although mine is a rear engined application you could use the same approach

I used 26 off 90 deg carbon steel mandrel bends and laser cut 10 mm thick head flanges. Pipe welds are metal finished flush. Each header pipe is 850 mm long, (tolerance +/- 10 mm). Collectors taper to 2.5", fabricated from 3" pipe. Silencer cans are 500 mm long, made from 4" stainless thin wall tube, with 2.5" perforated tube inners. Carbon steel parts sandblasted and painted with matt silver high heat paint. Once they are proven I plan to ceramic coat them.

What I did:
Bought 90 deg mandrel bends in 38 x 1.6 mm mild steel.
Had head flanges laser cut, so that pipes are fitted with a butt joint to flange.
Bolted flanges to head with wood plugs fitted sticking out of flanges to give me a positive, but movable location for the first bend.
Drew circles on plank of wood the same diameters as inside and outside radius of mandrill bends.
Marked off angles 15, 30, 45 etc, on circles to use as a template to ensure I always cut the bends true to the pipe bore.
Made up first pipe for #1 cylinder as this had longest straight section by tacking elbows, cut elbows and straight pipes together. Try to cut to exact angles where possible.
Cut #1 pipe to desired length, using calculated length along mean pipe radius to determine total length (straight length+x deg+x deg etc).
Now that position of collector is established, by trail and error join #2 pipe to collector, by joining bends in more than one orientation where necessary.
Don't cheat by cutting joining planes not perpendicular to pipe bore.
I found it easiest to work from rear to head, and keeping the flange to pipe joint loose till the last join.
Repeat for #3 and #4 pipe.
Depending how keen you are on keeping the pipe spacing more or less consistent and parallel, this can drive you crazy.
I found it helped a lot to make some square frames from flat bar to fit around the 4 pipes where they ran parallel, to keep them in position while tacking bends
Once all pipes are tacked up, remove from flanges again.
Weld up all pipes fully, using TIG if possible, or MIG.
Metal finish if required or desired
Reassemble manifold, and do final head flange to pipes and collector welds. Remember to fit closing plate between pipes at collector.
Duplicate the detail for the other side.

















[Edited on 12/8/14 by Fred W B]

[Edited on 12/8/14 by Fred W B]





You can do it quickly. You can do it cheap. You can do it right. – Pick any two.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
rincewind23

posted on 12/8/14 at 06:02 PM Reply With Quote
Thanks Fred - they look great!

I started with the plastic because I had literally no clue what the design was going to be - I've already decided to start again and take maccmike's suggestion to move the front two cylinders to the inside, and the rear two to the outside, in order to get the pipes closer to equal length with very little faffing around.

I was basing my activity on a set of videos on YouTube about header design. If you look at this one:



around the 2:45-2:55 mark you'll see that they used a tight 90 in the mockup, but a smoother curve in metal (2.5D? Just guessing..) - that's what I was planning to do.

The plan in the video involves buying a bunch of exhaust clamps, then tacking them to some scrap box to hold them in place, removing the plastic version and getting the steel version to fit exactly into the clamps.

Does this look feasible? The guys in the video are obviously professionals, and by now it should be obvious I'm not

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Fred W B

posted on 12/8/14 at 07:00 PM Reply With Quote
Certainly that does work, as the video demonstrates, and it would be the only way you could make a header if the car should not be in front of you whan you fabricate the steel parts.

Also your possibly wasted material in trial and error is (cheap?) plastic, rather than steel, but in the context of the time and effort to make manifolds like these the material cost is insignificant.

Considering the amount of work of fitting up the plastic, and making the jig, I don't regret starting directly with the actual parts. Also it doesn't help you with the challenge of getting the second side to match the first. If I did it again I would work on both sides at the same time, rather them finishing the first side and then trying to make the second side to match the first.

[Edited on 12/8/14 by Fred W B]





You can do it quickly. You can do it cheap. You can do it right. – Pick any two.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
rincewind23

posted on 25/8/14 at 07:45 PM Reply With Quote
Thanks for all the replies - I've been out of the country for work for a while but I got back this weekend and managed to get some work done, due to the bad weather I didn't have to work on the garden

Description
Description


I managed to eliminate the 90 degree bends, and got the lengths closer to equal. I'm thinking about swapping the middle two pipes around, in order to make the lengths more even..

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 25/8/14 at 10:39 PM Reply With Quote
I looked at that same video before doing mine, I also mocked up in cad but in the end I just bought some pipe and broke out the angry grinder and welder!
















Its not that pretty, but once its painted and heat wrapped no bugger will see!





Mistral Motorsport

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
rincewind23

posted on 26/8/14 at 09:44 AM Reply With Quote
Did you use stainless? looks like it.. where did you get the bends from?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 26/8/14 at 10:14 AM Reply With Quote
No, its mild steel, the kit came second hand from a chap who'd decided against making his own. I believe its an ebay job - I think pepperperformance? Quality of joins is basic, but I think they are priced to suit their quality!





Mistral Motorsport

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
rincewind23

posted on 27/8/14 at 06:47 PM Reply With Quote
Design #3 - I managed to eliminate an elbow with this one, I think this might be the one I'll go for in steel.

The research I've done seems to indicate that same-length headers is only really required on high bhp engines, and only makes a few bhp difference, so I'm not too worried about the difference between the longest and shortest here (about 15cm).

Design #3
Design #3

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mk1storm

posted on 30/8/14 at 09:08 AM Reply With Quote
Some food for thought, your last design is quite similar to the exhaust I got made up for my Rush, see below thread...

http://forum.daxsportingclub.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4814&hilit=GOE

Cheers,
Gary.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
rincewind23

posted on 30/8/14 at 10:32 AM Reply With Quote
Nice! How much were they, all in, if you don't mind me asking?

I know it was about 4 years ago, but should give me a rough idea. I've pretty much decided that I'm going to get someone else to make them up, once I investigated how much a tig welder (ac/dc so I could do ally later) would cost, and added that to the cost of a tig course and a bunch of stainless mandrel bends

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mk1storm

posted on 30/8/14 at 03:12 PM Reply With Quote
Kev, I'll send you a u2u...
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Andy S

posted on 31/8/14 at 06:32 PM Reply With Quote
Equal length is also not really relevant on the RV8 as you do not have even firing pulses for each bank.
the pulses in that collector are not 180 degree evenly spaced as they would be in a an I4, for tuned lengths on a crossplane you need to match equal length from one bank to the other not just on one bank. Better to make it easy for yourself rather than getting equal length for no real benefit.



quote:
Originally posted by rincewind23
Design #3 - I managed to eliminate an elbow with this one, I think this might be the one I'll go for in steel.

The research I've done seems to indicate that same-length headers is only really required on high bhp engines, and only makes a few bhp difference, so I'm not too worried about the difference between the longest and shortest here (about 15cm).

Design #3
Design #3








View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.