Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Jaguar S-type engine/gearbox feasibility?
scotty g

posted on 20/9/16 at 08:15 PM Reply With Quote
Jaguar S-type engine/gearbox feasibility?

Hi all, a mate and myself were discussing the possibility of using the running gear from a Jag S-type in kit cars. Am i right in thinking it's a Duratec V6 in 2.5 and 3 litre variations? All alloy, good power, good torque, RWD.
Has anyone used this, would love to read up on someones build diary and get an idea of feasibility and costs.
Cheers. Scotty.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ugg10

posted on 20/9/16 at 08:22 PM Reply With Quote
Worth a search on here there are several threads discussing this engine. As far as I can make out things to look out for are that all the jag engines came with dual mass flywheel, there is a debate whether the mondeo solid one fits, fuel flow rate is computer controlled and so does not have a return connection, there is a vct to control (not on mondeo), inlet ports are long and thin making bike to conversion more tricky, st220 plenum fits to reduce engine height I think. Hope this helps.





---------------------------------------------------------------
1968 Ford Anglia 105e, 1.7 Zetec SE, Mk2 Escort Workd Cup front end, 5 link rear
Build Blog - http://Anglia1968.weebly.com

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
40inches

posted on 20/9/16 at 10:11 PM Reply With Quote
Done about 400miles in mine, a bit of a faff, but worth it in the end.
Description
Description


Should just say to forget the 2.5, it's exactly the same size as the 3 litre.

[Edited on 20-9-16 by 40inches]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
scotty g

posted on 21/9/16 at 10:25 AM Reply With Quote
Yeah from what i've read so far the 2.5 isn't worth the effort as it has a few issues with it. Did you use the X-type sump & pickup pipe as this seams to be better?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
40inches

posted on 21/9/16 at 11:51 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by scotty g
Yeah from what i've read so far the 2.5 isn't worth the effort as it has a few issues with it. Did you use the X-type sump & pickup pipe as this seams to be better?


X-Type sump and pick up. ST200 inlet, after a lot of modding. ST220 throttle body. After spending a lot of time, decided the Jag DMF was the only (for me) feasible route for the clutch.
The VVT is a simple on/off system, so triggered by the ECU at 5200rpm.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
scotty g

posted on 21/9/16 at 02:21 PM Reply With Quote
I'm assuming you went with an aftermarket ECU, which one did you go with?
What would you have done differently given the benefit of hindsight?
The more i look into other engine options the more suprised i am that people don't try to be more adventurous, so many good engines out there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mitch2b

posted on 21/9/16 at 06:44 PM Reply With Quote
have a look on thr RHoCar site, a guy called dave perry put the 3ltr in my old robinhood, im sure he used the jab box and emrald ecu, went like stink and he did a great tidy job ,

Mitch

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.