Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Turbo to Engine Pipework
scootz

posted on 29/3/17 at 07:54 PM Reply With Quote
Turbo to Engine Pipework

Another daft question...

I can understand why a naturally aspirated engine might benefit from a larger-bore intake system and throttle body, but why do turbo engine tuners also like to use larger-bore pipes / throttle bodies, etc. ?

Most turbo-charger outlets that I've seen are fairly small in diameter. They also have to push the air through restrictions such as a MAF (if fitted) and a cooler. So why would wider pipework between the turbo / MAF / cooler / throttle body (and a wider TB itself) be advantageous?

Clearly there's an obvious answer here as it seem's the norm, but I can't understand why it wouldn't just lead to 'lag' and slow the air... ???





It's Evolution Baby!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
JAG

posted on 30/3/17 at 08:47 AM Reply With Quote
quote:

Clearly there's an obvious answer here as it seem's the norm, but I can't understand why it wouldn't just lead to 'lag' and slow the air... ???



You're mixing two attributes of the air intake system; air flow speed and air flow resistance.

Large bore pipes will definitely reduce the flow speed (increased lag) but if they also reduce the flow resistance then it may still be worth doing.





Justin


Who is this super hero? Sarge? ...No.
Rosemary, the telephone operator? ...No.
Penry, the mild-mannered janitor? ...Could be!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
theduck

posted on 30/3/17 at 11:21 AM Reply With Quote
My understanding, which could be completely wrong, is you want to keep the pipework between the turbo and intercooler small and then the intercooler to inlet larger. I have no idea why or where that came from though I must have read it somewhere.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
scootz

posted on 30/3/17 at 05:14 PM Reply With Quote
Cheers guys.





It's Evolution Baby!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mark chandler

posted on 30/3/17 at 05:39 PM Reply With Quote
It's about balancing loss through friction with response, suck water up through a straw 6" long, then cut it down to 1" and it all gets easier, double the diameter of the Straw and it gets easier but not as responsive.

You do not want to be compressing a large volume when it's not doing anything sat in pipework.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.