Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: CVH sump capacity
cliftyhanger

posted on 23/3/18 at 07:42 AM Reply With Quote
CVH sump capacity

I have been searching in vain for the sump capacity of the sierra 1.8CVH sump. Can anybody help?
Thanks
Clive

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Myke 2463

posted on 23/3/18 at 08:07 AM Reply With Quote
Sump capacity

4.0 lt with filter.





Be Lucky Mike.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
cliftyhanger

posted on 23/3/18 at 10:19 AM Reply With Quote
Brilliant, thank you.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick205

posted on 23/3/18 at 10:30 AM Reply With Quote
Many car engines are between 4 and 5 litre oil capacity. If you have (or get) a Haynes manual for the donor car it'll tell you in there, as well as the recommended oil spec.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
cliftyhanger

posted on 23/3/18 at 10:55 AM Reply With Quote
Nick, not worth getting a manual just for the sump! I have been running 4.5L as that was to the dipstick high mark. But the dipstick came with the block, not the sump. So it occurred to me I ought to check! Seems I was about right, but I will drain and refill with 4L and re-mark the dipstick.
Btw I don't trust haynes manuals at all for specs. Too many mistakes!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dusty

posted on 24/3/18 at 10:40 AM Reply With Quote
If the dipstick came with the block and is the right one for that block then the min/max markings are correct for that block regardless of what sump is on there. Don't re-mark the dipstick. If 4.5L takes the oil surface to the max mark then the volume of oil that should be in there is 4.5L.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
steve m

posted on 24/3/18 at 10:55 AM Reply With Quote
If the engine has been running fine with 4,5 l in there, that's probably the correct level
If the engine smokes a slot, then the level is to high





Thats was probably spelt wrong, or had some grammer, that the "grammer police have to have a moan at




View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.