Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Any electronic guru's want to help?
omega 24 v6

posted on 27/10/08 at 09:43 PM Reply With Quote
Any electronic guru's want to help?

Having spent ALL DAY metering the megasquirt wiring loom on my car and finding NOTHING fundamentally wrong with it I wonder if any electronic guru's would be willing to speak to me online or via U2U about a couple of niggles I'm having.
Basically electrics to me are no problem but electronics are a higher level and I'm finding it hard to comprehend where I may be going wrong or making a mistake. I need advice on why it's better to ground one end of a screen cable rather than the other and how to go about getting rid of electrical noise (If I have it I'm just not sure)
Getting desperate now as I'm ready for sva if I could only get to the stage that the engine would start first time every time the key is turned.
I don't want to offend anyone but I'd rather if you were not a guru that you didn't reply with what may not be a logical answer.





If it looks wrong it probably is wrong.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
BenB

posted on 27/10/08 at 10:12 PM Reply With Quote
IF you connect both of them to earth you can get something called a ground loop.

My brain doesn't work beyond that point but if you look it up on the net you should find some answers...

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
omega 24 v6

posted on 27/10/08 at 10:19 PM Reply With Quote
quote:

IF you connect both of them to earth you can get something called a ground loop.



Yes i know that but I want to know why grounding one end in particular would be better than the other. I had the vr screen grounded at the megasquirt end and the car would not start or even offer to start. So I disconnected it and it fired pretty instantly and it's run up to temp 4 times like this already but has trouble starting from cold/cranking.
Now today after metering the loom out I find that the screen is NOT grounded at the engine side at all (as I thought it was) so now there is no screening grounded at all ( but the car has run like this only not anymore as there are IMHO perhaps other issues that need looking into).
I really need someone who understands electronics and electric noise to have a chat with and ask some questions.





If it looks wrong it probably is wrong.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 27/10/08 at 10:44 PM Reply With Quote
If grounding the screen on the VR sensor is preventing the car starting, this would tend to suggest you have a short between one of the signal wires and the screen.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
omega 24 v6

posted on 27/10/08 at 10:53 PM Reply With Quote
quote:

If grounding the screen on the VR sensor is preventing the car starting, this would tend to suggest you have a short between one of the signal wires and the screen.



No they are defo clear. I believe the screen should be grounded at the engine end (not as I had it) I also thought I had it grounded at both ends (which I don't) so I'll try grounding at the engine end tomorrow (if I get time)





If it looks wrong it probably is wrong.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
tomblyth

posted on 28/10/08 at 08:22 AM Reply With Quote
ground loop
getting rid of it

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
omega 24 v6

posted on 28/10/08 at 09:20 AM Reply With Quote
Ah see now you are all asssuming I have ground loop problems. I reckon I have fuel pump interference problems that are affecting the spark moment. I also nee to find out the pro's and cons of which/what items to use to filter out any noise. Where I should and should not group items of equipment (relays and sensor wires. Whether I can feed certain items off of one fuse without risk of a feedback interference to more sensitive electonic items etc etc.
This is why I wanted to speak to a Guru. I don't want to spend a whole weeks holidays trying to get this thing going by having various stabs in the dark at what MAY BE a guesstimate of an answer.
But thanks for your input anyways so far.





If it looks wrong it probably is wrong.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Rob Lane

posted on 30/10/08 at 09:35 AM Reply With Quote
This is one of the trickiest areas in electronics and vehicles.

Vehicles are a perfect noise generator and it is not always possible to turn off the noise source to achieve a result.

If you know anyone with an oscilloscope you can borrow then this is the best visual way to check noise input. Some is inevitable but the level of noise is the key.

Grounding the shield at the engine is a way of 'extending' the shield protection along to the input. This is because it's the engine end that is generating the noise signal, so extending the shield affords protection.

ECU's in their own right are also 'noisy' that's why design is important, along with signal isolation and seperation.

Personally I didn't get a clean crank signal till I completely isolated the wiring of the sensor and gave it a seperate route.

Battery main cables should be avoided and the worst culprit, alternator wiring should be given a wide berth.

FI pumps are noisy but if kept clear of any MS inputs should be OK. Not heard of this as a specific item to avoid. Again a scope on pump wiring would show this up.

Bit general advice but hope it helps.

EDIT: Re-read your post again, I'm assuming you are having trouble with the crank signal, right?
It's important it is the correct way round, there is even a special section on this in MS manual.

[Edited on 30/10/08 by Rob Lane]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
omega 24 v6

posted on 2/11/08 at 08:19 PM Reply With Quote
quote:

EDIT: Re-read your post again, I'm assuming you are having trouble with the crank signal, right? It's important it is the correct way round, there is even a special section on this in MS manual.



Ok guys thanks for all your help. For future references the problems were many.
Firstly the mixture was way rich (and i could smell it was).
Second the lc1 was causing a lot of interference on warm up. This became apparent as i had it as a plug in setup. Once while the engine ign was on I plugged it in and the coil fired (fuel vapour ignited from the priming pulse) and flames out of the throttle bodies.
3rd I have a bottom of tank mounted fuel pump which was very noisy (in the hearing way) I was at the stage where I was only putting in a small amount of fuel at a time. I did however get to the point where I new I'd have to fill the tank pre SVA to check for leeks. So 2 gallons were added and the pump became much quieter.
4th I had fried a vb921 (dwell was to big and ign left on to long)
Now it seems all is fine and car is running a treat.
Problems as I see it were
Lc 1 was causing false triggers at startup
Fuel pressure may have been way to low due to not having enough fuel covering the pump.
Vb 921's replaced by BIP373 which in my opinion are MUCH MUCH better as they have a built in thermal cutout. So if you do overload them they don't fry. I only discovered the dwell problem AFTER them heating up and cutting out twice. So I saved on having to get new vb's which are now obsolete as well as grief wondering what was still wrong.





If it looks wrong it probably is wrong.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.