Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Citroen and their lying trip computers!!!
jps

posted on 5/9/13 at 08:02 AM Reply With Quote
Citroen and their lying trip computers!!!

Probably should not be surprised at all but still am...

There is a handy trip computer on the daily driver - Citroen C3 1.4 Hdi (not my choice - but hey-ho at least it is mega-economical I THOUGHT....) which told me since the last fill-up I had squeezed out 72.2 mpg with my frugal driving.

However the - not so scientific - 'fill to the brim, count the miles, fill to the brim again, work out the mpg' approach suggests I got 59mpg.

Bit of a difference there! Are the trip computers just nonsense - or is it just Shitroen who are flattering with their figures?

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 5/9/13 at 08:15 AM Reply With Quote
You can only ever get an accurate figure by brimming the tank and recording the mileage. The trip computers are estimates at best, though some are much better than others.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
luke2152

posted on 5/9/13 at 08:21 AM Reply With Quote
When I fill my a6 up it tells me I wont have to fill up for 1600km. This is wildly opimistic and 800 would be normal. 1000 would be good
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
AndyW

posted on 5/9/13 at 08:30 AM Reply With Quote
Mine is magic. The car still drives when the trip computer says no fuel, then I stop, and when I start I have 10 miles of fuel left. I have never tried, but if I keep stopping maybe the tank will refill completely. Unless the computer tells me otherwise.

I never take what they say as fact, more of a guessstimate

Andy

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
steve m

posted on 5/9/13 at 08:44 AM Reply With Quote
I like to play the game. of get to a destination with more fuel in the tank, than when I left home

If fill to the brim, it shows 760 miles to empty, but on an 80 miles journey recently all motorway, I had left in the tank

828 miles,

very odd !





Thats was probably spelt wrong, or had some grammer, that the "grammer police have to have a moan at




View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
eddie99

posted on 5/9/13 at 08:52 AM Reply With Quote
My Alfa is very optimistic as well... Normally says about 5more mpg averaged than i actually get... Oh and i have managed the range of what it first said on a fill up, but that was trying with extreme care and as economical as possible.





http://www.elitemotorsporteng.co.uk/

Twitter: @Elitemotoreng

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Elite-Motorsport-Engineering/153409081394323

NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
PSpirine

posted on 5/9/13 at 10:50 AM Reply With Quote
You'll find 5-10% is the general optimism expressed by most OEMs on the trip computer. Some are worse than others (as in, the error is built in), but I shan't say which are good and which are bad.

Keep in mind that 7mpg error on 70mpg is the same percentage as 2mpg error on a 20mpg indicated. A lot of people seem to be catching onto the trip computer errors recently because the overall mpg has increased so much so the absolute error seems worse, whereas previously someone who was getting 20mpg instead of 22mpg wouldn't really have thought much of it.

Brim to brim is the way to go. Plenty of very handy iPhone/Android apps to help you track it..

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeR

posted on 5/9/13 at 11:44 AM Reply With Quote
My SMAX is about 10% out - has been consistently. Frustrates me as I'm sure they should be able to calculate it better.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
whitestu

posted on 5/9/13 at 12:02 PM Reply With Quote
My Mondeo is about 10% out as well. My old Passatt was the same but my Prius was spot on. Without checking you would think both the Passat and the mondeo were more economical than the Prius but in reality the opposite was true. I'm sure the marketing departments have the final say in accuracy of these things.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
skov

posted on 5/9/13 at 12:08 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by PSpirine
Brim to brim is the way to go. Plenty of very handy iPhone/Android apps to help you track it..


Ah, but that assumes the odometer is spot on. I wouldn't be surprised if that was a few percent out on many cars too!

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
jossey

posted on 5/9/13 at 12:09 PM Reply With Quote
My 1 series is pretty good.

One thing to note is when you drive your car 100 miles by the car speedo there is a chance you have done 95 miles.

That said my car says I average 62mpg as you said I did the test.

580 miles later using gps my car said i had only done 560 but I worked out that it did 60.5 mpg

The old 5 series made up the figures it was always 10mpg out lol





Thanks



David Johnson

Building my tiger avon slowly but surely.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick205

posted on 5/9/13 at 12:12 PM Reply With Quote
They're only calculating the fuel used, not actually measuring it. This will always be inaccurate to some degree although the OP's sounds pretty poor to me. The last few VAG cars I've run have all been optimistic by 5-15%.

TBH you should know without a computer how efficiently or not you're driving






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
PSpirine

posted on 5/9/13 at 12:23 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by skov
quote:
Originally posted by PSpirine
Brim to brim is the way to go. Plenty of very handy iPhone/Android apps to help you track it..


Ah, but that assumes the odometer is spot on. I wouldn't be surprised if that was a few percent out on many cars too!



Speedo on modern cars is usually good (assuming no weird tyres fitted) - within <1% of GPS verified.

In any case, the apps allow you to put in correction for speedo/odo readings.


Once again.. the trip computer "error" is not through miscalculation, it is a deliberate factor applied by many OEM's, normally around 5-8%, although the Germans seem to be the cheekiest and get away with closer to 10%.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
whitestu

posted on 5/9/13 at 02:39 PM Reply With Quote
quote:

Speedo on modern cars is usually good (assuming no weird tyres fitted) - within <1% of GPS verified.



That's not my experience. Most seem to over read by 5-10%, with the exception of Citroens whihc always seem to read very accurately!

[Edited on 5/9/13 by whitestu]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 5/9/13 at 05:23 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by steve m
I like to play the game. of get to a destination with more fuel in the tank, than when I left home

If fill to the brim, it shows 760 miles to empty, but on an 80 miles journey recently all motorway, I had left in the tank

828 miles,

very odd !


Range is worked out on the current average MPG, on a motorway average MPG is always going to be higher than the average normal suburban/urban running mpg.

[Edited on 5/9/13 by britishtrident]





[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 5/9/13 at 05:35 PM Reply With Quote
On a lot of modern cars the speedo is calibrated to read about 4% to 5% fast but the speed via OBD II is usually very accurate if compared to GPS.

Peugeot got into a lot of trouble about 10 years because there odometers were reading 25% to 30% high.


On Rovers the BMW trip computer MPG is usually pretty accurate in normal suburban use but is more optimistic in motorway conditions.





[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
turbodisplay

posted on 5/9/13 at 05:39 PM Reply With Quote
I had an indicated 63 77mpg on a pug 407. Actual figure 49 -53!
NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.