Forum site speed
jacko - 29/1/09 at 06:29 PM
Hi is this forum site speed going slow just for me or everyone 
bigrich - 29/1/09 at 06:33 PM
It has been very slow up untill the site falling over on Tuesday, but seems quite quick for me at the moment
Stuart_B - 29/1/09 at 06:36 PM
hi, was going slow just before the last crash this afternoon, but now seems back to normaly.
stuart
mr henderson - 29/1/09 at 06:54 PM
It varies. Sometimes a clicked on thread will open more or less immediately, other times I get a game of Freecell on the go to have something to do
while I'm waiting
John
kipper - 29/1/09 at 06:56 PM
Hi Graham ....Do you think it might be the yahoo we have to use here in good old sunny ull. ?
I even have trouble when on E BAY
Regards Kipper.
eznfrank - 29/1/09 at 07:00 PM
See THIS previous post by Fozzie
mr henderson - 29/1/09 at 07:07 PM
quote:
Originally posted by eznfrank
See THIS previous post by Fozzie
Not really relevant though. The occasional slowness has been going on for a long time, and stilll happens now
John
Fozzie - 29/1/09 at 07:41 PM
Actually John,...it is (very) relevant!
Fozzie
splitrivet - 29/1/09 at 07:41 PM
You want slow, use Eclipse internet, slower than a slow pi$$ed slug going up a 85 degree icy hill tied to a brick against a huricane.
Cheers,
Bob
splitrivet - 29/1/09 at 07:43 PM
Is it just me or is u2u not working.
Cheers,
Bob
jacko - 29/1/09 at 07:45 PM
quote:
Originally posted by kipper
Hi Graham ....Do you think it might be the yahoo we have to use here in good old sunny ull. ?
I even have trouble when on E BAY
Regards Kipper.
Hi Denis i wondered if it was Kingston Karoo that was slowing the web down thats why i asked this question
Graham
mr henderson - 29/1/09 at 07:58 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Fozzie
Actually John,...it is (very) relevant!
Fozzie
So are you saying that the site has been fixed now, and that that was what the maintenance was for?
dhutch - 29/1/09 at 08:06 PM
quote:
Originally posted by mr henderson
So are you saying that the site has been fixed now, and that that was what the maintenance was for?
He seams to be saying the site totaly died, and it took a while to fix. Sorry.
- Howaver as you say, it doesnt really comment on and current slowness. Although i havent notice any as such.
Daniel
Fozzie - 29/1/09 at 08:37 PM
quote:
Originally posted by mr henderson
quote:
Originally posted by Fozzie
Actually John,...it is (very) relevant!
Fozzie
So are you saying that the site has been fixed now, and that that was what the maintenance was for?
Errrr no.......the site crashed suddenly..kaput...dead.....on Tuesday evening at around 21:45 hours.
ChrisW worked until the early hours of Wednesday morning to give you all something to read whilst he repaired....
The site came back on Wednesday evening (apart from replies/new posts).
ChrisW then worked until just before dawn this morning to get that last part of the site working.
The site crashed momentarily this afternoon which was then rectified by Luke......
I have not had any slowness since then....
although it is worth mentioning that at peak times a certain amount of slowness is to be expected.... 
It would help enormously if the relevant posts/threads were read before posting...
Fozzie
MikeR - 29/1/09 at 08:42 PM
Who's luke?
David Jenkins - 29/1/09 at 08:43 PM
quote:
Originally posted by MikeR
Who's luke?
omega0684 - 29/1/09 at 09:33 PM
i varies for me, sometimes i can come onto the site and it will be lightsaber quick (so couldn't help myself 
) but other time it can be very
slow, is it down to how busy the site is at all?
Fozzie - 29/1/09 at 11:33 PM
quote:
Originally posted by MikeR
Who's luke?
4 answers to that question!
1......Luke Skywalker
2......Cool Hand
3......My off-spring number 2
4......Guy who works with ChrisW at his 'proper' job, always a 'good-egg' when it comes to the frustrating, head-scratching, IT
techie type problems!
Fozzie