there is an avatar being used just now that I dont think is appropriate, especially as my three young cousins were up today and may have seen it.

As far as content goes, lewd material has normally been marked as not work safe etc, but as the same provision cannot be made for avatars can there be some sort of rule introduced?

I hate to be a party pooper, but I'm sure people have been in the same situation.

Cheers
Mark

I think it is cheeky rather than rude. My personal opinion is if you can find similar material in a tabloid newspaper - then its OK, if it falls below that standard then perhaps a polite request for removal is in order

Can I use my pictures from the Sport then? Or Richard Whitely in a compromising situation with Carol Vorderman. Admitted you can only see the back of his head and her from the waist down but it's good enough for me. That dog is naked apart from a hat and scarf, such filth should never be allowed
Sorry I've just noticed he has shades, it's o.k. then.

[Edited on 9/4/04 by Peteff]

Naked shade waering dogs are one thing but Richard Whitely pleeeeeaaaasssee. I am going to have to try to get that image out of my head now - back in two days, uuuurrrgggghhhhhhhhh.

Must be a party pooper , as the one with the animation of a buxom lady pulling her top off , although very nice, probably shouldn't be on this site.

Tabloid papers , by the way , often contain made up stories, lies and total <>$%^&£---usually from politicians !!!

ps --my missus asked why I was looking at porn on seeing the booby avitar , when in fact I was looking at a good thread --honest !!!!

Phil