you will prob never be able to know the truth
Just watching the news, and a new inquiry is to be held,
Was it an accident, or was she murderd
IMHO = murdered
i agree there are too many un-answered questions and things that dont add up,hm government imho had a hand in it.
you will prob never be able to know the truth
Dont by the accident theory here either.
there was a tv program about this about a year ago, apparently she was driven away in a different merc than the one she was meant to, that was their
main theory that the car she was driven in was tamperd with.
IMHO murder
What I find funny is that in a limmosine like that with a body guard then surely if he ( the body guard) was doing his job properly, then all the
occupants in the vehicle should have been wearing their seatbelts EXCEPT for the body guard, incase he had to decamp the vehicle quickly.
Hit the beehive with a big stick and retreats quickly to watch the fun.
Another bunch of lawyers with their noses in the trough. It will achieve nothing and divert resources from aspects such as resurfacing roadsetc
Alternatively we could look on the positive side and assume it will divert cash from more sleeping policemen
No matter how many enquiries there are I can't believe that they will ever come up with any conclusion other than it being an accident. The
enquiry recently that concluded that, but if her majesty's government call an enquiry into whether her majesty's son was involved in
murdering his ex wife somehow it seems unlikely that the answer would be that he did, or that any other member of the household was involved.
The truth may well be different however, but we will never know. Personally, there are too many unanswered questions for me to currently believe it
was an accident, but what do I know.
quote:
Originally posted by steve m
Just watching the news, and a new inquiry is to be held,
Was it an accident, or was she murderd
IMHO = murdered
Now don't get me wrong.... I'm a willing as the next geek to buy a conspiracy theory and I'm a fan of Michael Moore.... but at the end
of the day, killing her?
What'd be the bloody point???
Who gained *anything* from it?
And Al Fayed is nearly as barking as Di was!!!
Cheers,
James
bl**dy hell - I didn't think anyone believed these conspiracy theories - just repeated 'em for a laff .!.!.!.!.!.
I've got a feeling big Mo will just keep chucking money towards this until he gets the answer he wants, trouble is he's never ever going to
get it whether it's the truth or not 
Come on guys - get real! If you were trying to murder someone would you rely on their driver getting pi**ed (of his own volition!), rely on said
driver finding the most solid bit of Paris to drive into, rely on the occupants of the car being too stupid to wear seatbelts even when travelling at
very high speed & rely on the Paparazzi doing the job of car chasing for you.
I'm sure when you have access to that amount of money & power you could find a more reliable method!
*sits quietly in the corner trying to avoid eye-contact with the tin-foil-hat-wearing conspiricy theorists* 
quote:
Originally posted by russbost
I'm sure when you have access to that amount of money & power you could find a more reliable method!
quote:
Originally posted by James
Now don't get me wrong.... I'm a willing as the next geek to buy a conspiracy theory and I'm a fan of Michael Moore.... but at the end of the day, killing her?
What'd be the bloody point???
Who gained *anything* from it?
And Al Fayed is nearly as barking as Di was!!!
Cheers,
James
I can still recall all the retired majors, captains etal who drank in my mo'-in-laws' pub carrying on about this.
The gist is that 'The Establishment' of old had a beef with the Al Fayed family from as far back as pre ww1. Apparently they were/are arms,
and anything else, dealers to both sides. Backed the other side in the Suez thing, and traded with whoever wanted to in WW2.
Then there is the idea of the mother of the future King of England, being married to a Moslem, whose father ( A Western Oriental Gentleman ),
'The Establishment' would rather see disappear. Trouble is, he owns Harrods and still does business with The City, so makes a lot of people
a lot of money.
Cheers,
Syd. 
quote:
Originally posted by Syd Bridge
I can still recall all the retired majors, captains etal who drank in my mo'-in-laws' pub carrying on about this.
The gist is that 'The Establishment' of old had a beef with the Al Fayed family from as far back as pre ww1. Apparently they were/are arms, and anything else, dealers to both sides. Backed the other side in the Suez thing, and traded with whoever wanted to in WW2.
Then there is the idea of the mother of the future King of England, being married to a Moslem, whose father ( A Western Oriental Gentleman
Cheers,
Syd.
quote:
Originally posted by novacaine
there was a tv program about this about a year ago, apparently she was driven away in a different merc than the one she was meant to, that was their main theory that the car she was driven in was tamperd with.
IMHO murder
4 times the french legal limit is still quite low
UK limit = 80mg per 100ml of blood
French limit = 50mg per 100ml of blood
so actually he was only just over 2.5 times the UK limit...
and as for speed - have you seen french drivers? they ALL drive like that!
[Edited on 9/1/07 by DaveFJ]
We do need to get DaveFJ to post more - that avatar is strangely fascinating.
So Kennedy was shot by lee harvey oswald from a book repository in dallas in 1963, yet the moon landings film was shot in hollywood....
quote:
Originally posted by 02GF74
interesting .... so the fact that the chauffeur was 4 times over the legal alocohol limit doing 4 times the speed limit in a tunnel with the only poereson surviving being the one that wore a seat belt had absolutley nowt to do with it?
accident. Ridiculous to think its anything but.
What exactly are all these unanswered questions?
quote:
Originally posted by JoelP
What exactly are all these unanswered questions?