locodude
|
 posted on 21/8/02 at 06:40 PM |
|
|
Message For Chris W
Hi There
With all these new sections, is there any chance of a x-flow engined car section for us luddites (tongue planted firmly in cheek but ever
hopefull)?
Chris PTM
I remember when my engine were all fields!
|
|
|
|
|
chrisg
|
| posted on 21/8/02 at 07:49 PM |
|
|
Yeah and i want a section for cars with no engine in them at all!!
Cheers
chris 
Note to all: I really don't know when to leave well alone. I tried to get clever with the mods, then when they gave me a lifeline to see the
error of my ways, I tried to incite more trouble via u2u. So now I'm banned, never to return again. They should have done it years ago!
|
|
|
locodude
|
| posted on 21/8/02 at 08:13 PM |
|
|
Come on big fella, get it fitted for the cadwell trip! or this weekend for a run over the 'cat and fiddle'. See what you're missing just being a
passenger!
CG (the real one) 
|
|
|
Macca
|
| posted on 21/8/02 at 09:43 PM |
|
|
How about a section where we can ask for new sections?
|
|
|
locodude
|
| posted on 21/8/02 at 09:59 PM |
|
|
Nice one macca!
|
|
|
stephen_gusterson
|
| posted on 21/8/02 at 10:16 PM |
|
|
or a section where we can debate if we need less sections......
or need to BE sectioned 
atb
steve
|
|
|
stephen_gusterson
|
| posted on 21/8/02 at 10:30 PM |
|
|
actually, im starting to feel a bit sorry for those indy guys, so perhaps the extra groups deserve a bit of a go...
atb
steve
|
|
|
ChrisW
|
| posted on 22/8/02 at 11:20 AM |
|
|
The Indy and BEC groups are intended to lure them away from their respective eGroups in order to get a few more people on here. They may well decide
after a few months to merge with existing sections but for the moment they're allowing for an easy progression from the dark side.
BTW the Locost section was so all us building the car from the book didn't feel left out but as was suggested, the site is 'Locost Builders'
already so I dropped it.
Chris
My gaff my rules
|
|
|
