Hi all.
For reasons I'm not going to go into, persons, who will for now remain nameless, have drilled two BIG holes in each of my lower chassis rails.
Big as in, the full width of the box section. On the outside the holes are 21-22mm, on the inside, 11mm. This pic shows one of the holes, looking
from outside: (I've had to cut back some of the aluminium bodywork - a pain but at this point, the least of my worries). What this is for,
believe it or not, is just to take an M8 bolt.
Pretty bloody terrible I'm sure you'll agree. Obviously this is major damage to the chassis.
Now I have discussed this with Dax who made the chassis, and we have a plan to rectify it, which seems sensible to me. However given the knowledge on
here, I figured that it wouldn't hurt to get a few more opinions, or pointers for things to watch out for.
Current plan is to turn up a bushing to fit into each hole; 21mm at one end, 11 at the other. I did one tonight:
Then fit this in the hole, and weld around each end.
OK. That all seems sensible to me. I'm going to be doing some test pieces first, which I will be doing some destructive testing on as I want to
be sure. But can anyone else think of anything else I should be doing, checking, watching out for before I do?
Thanks in advance....
Andy
[Edited on 23/10/12 by The Black Flash]
That bush looks exactly how I'd rectify it. Just make sure that when drilling you didn't thin out the bottom or top surface of the tube -
otherwise I'd be inclined to weld a plate over those faces.
It's not the end of the world, particularly if it's not a "lightweight" chassis - there's certainly no reason it should be
any less robust than any other bolt mounting through a rail.
Personally I wouldn't choose weld such a heavy section component to a thin thickness member.
I would reduce the thickness on the larger end of the bush and or chamfer it this should make for a better chance of a good weld .
I'd be happy with that as long as you can get a good weld at both sides
where abouts is that on the chassis ?
This way the difference in material thickess of the material sections being welded isn't so great and there is less of a stress raiser at the
weld.
I would not do that, too much stress, the proper way is to plate it.
I agree re welding the very heavy new bush to the chassis rail, it needs to be closer in terms of thickness.
I would also plate top and bottom, just to be belt and braces. The extra 100grams will not hurt you, but would be reassuring.
I would prefer to do it properly. Remove the body panel and section in a new piece of tube from node to node.
Cheers
Fred W B
My more slapdash approach would be to either fit the bush if you need to mount a bolt in it, or just weld a plate over it. Its not ideal from a technical point of view but a locost chassis is hardly a highly engineered thing anyway. The difference in material thickness might matter if it was a wishbone but not here.
What Fred said
but if its a total PITA then i would plate it
quote:but this is a dax rush.....
Originally posted by JoelPIts not ideal from a technical point of view but a locost chassis is hardly a highly engineered thing anyway
OP, pic 3, looks just ripe for a TIG weld.
I would however first clean the rust from the inside and the paint off the outside.
I'd probably rig up a back purge then the resulting weld should be a flush butt on
the outside and a clean penetration fillet inside.
I have several M8 threads in my chassis consisting of a !3mm through hole with
12mm bar (threaded M8) TIG welded in both sides.
Cheers,
Paul G
quote:
Originally posted by mcerd1
I'd be happy with that as long as you can get a good weld at both sides
where abouts is that on the chassis ?
quote:
Originally posted by britishtrident
This way the difference in material thickess of the material sections being welded isn't so great and there is less of a stress raiser at the weld.
quote:
Originally posted by Fred W B
I would prefer to do it properly. Remove the body panel and section in a new piece of tube from node to node.
Cheers
Fred W B
quote:
Originally posted by designer
I would not do that, too much stress, the proper way is to plate it.
I'd be happy with your original solution or BT's refinemnet, it's maybe not 100% perfect design practice but I'm sure there will
be lots of bigger compromises made elsewhere.
Cheers
Davie
p.s it took less than 5 mins to work the why and the who
The integrity of the box section has been lost, the only safe way to repair it is either to plate each side or replace that part of the box section, neither of which look like easy jobs.
quote:
Originally posted by The Black Flash
quote:
Originally posted by mcerd1
I'd be happy with that as long as you can get a good weld at both sides
where abouts is that on the chassis ?
That one is about 6 inches forwards of the front of the rear arch. The other is directly below the scuttle.
OK, so what about this:
I make a plate with bush welded on (left), then weld onto the chassis rail. (right) The RH side of the bush I'll just weld into the hole, the LH
(outside) will have a nice big plate.
If I did this, should I weld only the ends of the plate, or all the way around it?
ETA better pic
[Edited on 24/10/12 by The Black Flash]
I'd weld all around the perimeter of the oustide plate if you go for that option. (and deliver a big bill to where it needs to go....)
quote:
Originally posted by chillis
The integrity of the box section has been lost, the only safe way to repair it is either to plate each side or replace that part of the box section, neither of which look like easy jobs.
tbh your orginal idea with the big boss thing is just fine, I'd put a chamfer round the edge to help with welding but it's well strong enough, your meant to use a crush tube when putting bolts through rails anyway, that's just a mighty fine crush tube. Larger box chassis (landy ones for example) are often full of webs & tubes to help stiffen them up, there's no reason it all has to be the same thickness throughout.
quote:
Originally posted by The Black Flash
OK, so what about this:
I make a plate with bush welded on (left), then weld onto the chassis rail. (right) The RH side of the bush I'll just weld into the hole, the LH (outside) will have a nice big plate.
If I did this, should I weld only the ends of the plate, or all the way around it?
ETA better pic
[Edited on 24/10/12 by The Black Flash]
14mm id washer
OK, so I'm basically back to the bushing then, which is fine. I can easily chamfer the edges so that's no problem.
The reason I'd like to use a turned bush rather than a simple crush tube + washer is so that I can tap a thread on the inside of the bush. Then
I'll bolt straight into that (with locktight) and not have to have nut + bolt sticking into my footwell.
Your second idea works better for me.
Personally I would plate all four faces of the chassis, well beyond the hole, however my fabrication is always belt & braces.
Reflecting on it, if you want belt & braces without removing the body, slip over a 3 sided box over the lower of the chassis, get the side plates
as high up the hole as you dare, and weld everything.
4x2 box with the top cut off might slip over, and would be simple.
[Edited on 24/10/12 by T66]
Personally I'd replace the member and find a better solution rather than supporting something requiring a chuffing great bush mid-span if at all possible.
quote:
Originally posted by coyoteboy
Personally I'd replace the member and find a better solution rather than supporting something requiring a chuffing great bush mid-span if at all possible.
Doesn't NEED to be, no, but it's a bit of a botch to plug it. I just like a neat clean solution rather than a patch that'll probably
take more work to do than doing a direct swap.
[Edited on 24/10/12 by coyoteboy]
I dont think my suggestion is a botch, its a solution. By the time its painted most wont notice it. ....
The classic car guys repair far worse than that
I do. We disagree. Not the end of the world though, I don't disagree it would work but it introduces lots of issues (vastly different wall thicknesses being different stiffnesses, harder to weld together properly (getting enough heat into the larger part to get good penetration) etc. Plated it'll stand proud so the bodywork around it won't fit as well. Just loads of little reasons I'd replace it fully rather than fix, but I'm a bit perfectionist.
quote:
Originally posted by coyoteboy
Doesn't NEED to be, no, but it's a bit of a botch to plug it. I just like a neat clean solution rather than a patch that'll probably take more work to do than doing a direct swap.
[Edited on 24/10/12 by coyoteboy]
quote:
Originally posted by coyoteboy
I do. We disagree. Not the end of the world though, I don't disagree it would work but it introduces lots of issues (vastly different wall thicknesses being different stiffnesses, harder to weld together properly (getting enough heat into the larger part to get good penetration) etc. Plated it'll stand proud so the bodywork around it won't fit as well. Just loads of little reasons I'd replace it fully rather than fix, but I'm a bit perfectionist.
quote:
Originally posted by The Black Flash
Well, the guy who designed the chassis said that a welded bushing would be "quite a nice solution" and that replacing the whole member was really not required.
Made some test pieces last night from smaller tube, and tested them against normal tube and tube with big holes drilled in it via the extremely unscientific method of a large hammer. I was pleased to confirm that a welded bush doesn't seem to noticably weaken the tube, (unless the weld is crap of course.)
quote:
Originally posted by The Black Flash
Made some test pieces last night from smaller tube, and tested them against normal tube and tube with big holes drilled in it via the extremely unscientific method of a large hammer. I was pleased to confirm that a welded bush doesn't seem to noticably weaken the tube, (unless the weld is crap of course.)
Just weld it up, easy, 10 minutes and your done.
Cheers
David
quote:
Originally posted by daviep
p.s. I'm sure some of our more theoretical builders will be along to tell you that your test results are not valid as the problem will be "cyclic stresses" or something else with bigger words.
quote:
Originally posted by mcerd1
quote:
Originally posted by daviep
p.s. I'm sure some of our more theoretical builders will be along to tell you that your test results are not valid as the problem will be "cyclic stresses" or something else with bigger words.
translation: hit it lots of times with a smaller hammer and see what happens
quote:
Originally posted by daviep
quote:
Originally posted by The Black Flash
Made some test pieces last night from smaller tube, and tested them against normal tube and tube with big holes drilled in it via the extremely unscientific method of a large hammer. I was pleased to confirm that a welded bush doesn't seem to noticably weaken the tube, (unless the weld is crap of course.)
Good stuff, looks like you are making are nice job of the build.
Cheers
Davie
p.s. I'm sure some of our more theoretical builders will be along to tell you that your test results are not valid as the problem will be "cyclic stresses" or something else with bigger words.