Rod Ends
|
posted on 3/8/12 at 10:12 PM |
|
|
Look at tubes on this frame!
Carbon fibre grid
[Edited on 3/8/12 by Rod Ends]
|
|
|
skydivepaul
|
posted on 3/8/12 at 11:02 PM |
|
|
pretty sweet.
i bet its bloody expensive to buy and also to repair when you crash into a pothole
http://www.smartideasuk.com
http://www.smartmapping.co.uk
HD CCTV
3D design solutions and integration
IP security systems
access control systems
|
|
maccmike
|
posted on 3/8/12 at 11:29 PM |
|
|
different
|
|
AndyGT
|
posted on 4/8/12 at 03:49 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by skydivepaul
pretty sweet.
i bet its bloody expensive to buy and also to repair when you crash into a pothole
Or buy the mtb version....
nothing is impossible
everything is possible
|
|
AndyGT
|
posted on 4/8/12 at 03:59 AM |
|
|
Road bike: 3,850 GBP for the frame direct from the US.
nothing is impossible
everything is possible
|
|
clanger
|
posted on 4/8/12 at 07:22 AM |
|
|
don't look too safe to me.......
the roadie might survive the odd pothole but I reckon a bit of rough and tumble on the MTB will result in its demise
I MTB in some rough stuff in the Afan forest and have had a few "offs" shall we say, that MTB would fold up like an A4 sheet of paper if
it hit a rock or tree.
Not convinced............... more like a bit of a willy waving promanade posers bike
|
|
johnwilders
|
posted on 4/8/12 at 07:29 AM |
|
|
Aerodynamics must be crap, but its a tiny space frame we all know how strong they are.
|
|
mccsp
|
posted on 4/8/12 at 07:42 AM |
|
|
Forget breaking the bike! They look a nightmare to wash and keep clean!
Why do it the easy way, when I can do things my way!
|
|
black fingernail
|
posted on 4/8/12 at 08:47 AM |
|
|
Beutiful, didn't barnes wallace originally create this design for wellington bombers in wwII? i think he called it 'geodetic' or
something like that, i hope the yanks dont claim to have "invented" this
|
|
black fingernail
|
posted on 4/8/12 at 08:47 AM |
|
|
Beutiful, didn't barnes wallace originally create this design for wellington bombers in wwII? i think he called it 'geodetic' or
something like that, i hope the yanks dont claim to have "invented" this
|
|
MikeRJ
|
posted on 4/8/12 at 08:51 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by clanger
Not convinced............... more like a bit of a willy waving promanade posers bike
Agreed. even if it didn't break I suspect you'd end up with a pretty heavy frame after a session on some muddy trails
|
|
wylliezx9r
|
posted on 4/8/12 at 10:29 AM |
|
|
I wonder how much weight this design actually saves ?
I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered.
George Best
|
|
vanepico
|
posted on 4/8/12 at 01:59 PM |
|
|
Don't be silly! When they do road races in the UK they recover the roads, so all the foreign competitors probably think every road is like that!
And I can tell you there are some monster holes in littlehampton!
It'll be advanced composite matches in seconds!
__________________________
Will CAD for food/money/beer...
|
|
gottabedone
|
posted on 4/8/12 at 05:17 PM |
|
|
you wouldn't want to come off and land on your frame - it would be like getting your nads cheese grated
Steve
|
|
Liam
|
posted on 7/8/12 at 12:51 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by johnwilders
Aerodynamics must be crap, but its a tiny space frame we all know how strong they are.
Yeah but we also know a monocoque, i.e. a simple tube in this case, is stronger If this frame has any real strength/weight advantages over a simple
CF tube frame... I'll eat my hat. Expensive gimmick if you ask me, with loads of downsides - maintenance, aero, vulnerability to local damage,
looks (imho)...
|
|
Benonymous
|
posted on 13/8/12 at 11:31 AM |
|
|
My mate Chris got cleaned up on his CF bike. The car hit him side on and the top tube snapped like a carrot. The broken end plunged into his thigh.
It was pretty gruesome. I imagine this frame would make an even more graphic wound in similar circumstances.
I think this frame is just a case of we can build it! But it doesn't mean you should
|
|
roadrunner
|
posted on 13/8/12 at 12:05 PM |
|
|
It looks quite impressive, but the wheels are more impressive, there's no spokes.
|
|