Ugg10
|
posted on 23/9/15 at 09:49 PM |
|
|
Nice project, was very clise to buying a spaceframe anglia with this running gear in it about two years ago.
Any reason you used standard rivets on the floor rather than the big head ones that spread the load more? Encased prop tunnel is interesting though.
---------------------------------------------------------------
1968 Ford Anglia 105e, 1.7 Zetec SE, Mk2 Escort Workd Cup front end, 5 link rear
Build Blog - http://Anglia1968.weebly.com
|
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 23/9/15 at 10:15 PM |
|
|
There isn't really much weight on the floor anyway
A might fit bigger rivets later if a feel it needs it
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
CosKev3
|
posted on 24/9/15 at 07:15 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rossmcleod
There isn't really much weight on the floor anyway
A might fit bigger rivets later if a feel it needs it
I would change them now,the floor has to take the weight of you or your passengers standing on it whilst getting in/out of car.
Looking at pics your having this built at SKC?
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 24/9/15 at 01:17 PM |
|
|
Yes there building a bit of it
I mean there only doing the wiring and am doing the rest
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
sdh2903
|
posted on 24/9/15 at 01:31 PM |
|
|
You really could do with a load more rivets. The smaller head ones are fine but need lots more or Mr IVA man won't be happy. I'm sure it
comes under general construction standards somewhere. Most people have rivets pitched around every 50mm/2".
The bigger head rivets are best for riveting bodywork/fibreglass.
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 29/9/15 at 09:55 AM |
|
|
Picked up the frame
Now time to build myself
Fun and games begin
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 30/9/15 at 06:09 PM |
|
|
Brake lines the night :-)
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 15/10/15 at 09:30 PM |
|
|
It's slow but spent a few hours the night doing the brake lines
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 18/10/15 at 01:36 PM |
|
|
Few hours this morning
Few more pics
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
CosKev3
|
posted on 18/10/15 at 02:39 PM |
|
|
Where do your master cylinders/brake pipes come out through bulkhead?
If that T piece is for a brake light pressure switch they are better mounted so the switch points towards the ground,as people have had issues
bleeding up the brakes with the switch mounted facing upwards.
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 18/10/15 at 03:47 PM |
|
|
This is what a have so far mate
I'm waiting on a new tee (that ones ducked) so it's just sitting there for the time being then a will pipe it up
[Edited on 18/10/15 by Rossmcleod]
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 29/10/15 at 10:51 PM |
|
|
Fuel lines sorted till fuel tank is fitted and engine in
Plus grp panels arrived
Picking them up
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
CosKev3
|
posted on 29/10/15 at 11:02 PM |
|
|
Will your diff fit in with fuel lines where they are?
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 29/10/15 at 11:05 PM |
|
|
Honestly not sure maybe
The diff is arriving next week we will find out then
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
CosKev3
|
posted on 29/10/15 at 11:11 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rossmcleod
Honestly not sure maybe
The diff is arriving next week we will find out then
Oooppps.
Fitting the diff is a good idea before running your brake and fuel lines.......
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 29/10/15 at 11:18 PM |
|
|
Bit late now
Worst comes to it a can move the fuel lines
[Edited on 29/10/15 by Rossmcleod]
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 30/10/15 at 10:37 PM |
|
|
Fitted the arms and coilovers
Front coilovers
Rear coilovers
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 6/11/15 at 08:37 PM |
|
|
Fitting side panels
Temp fit before proper fit
Had to cut the panels
The frame is 6 inches bigger than ur normal frame because of the size of the engine
[Edited on 6/11/15 by Rossmcleod]
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
CosKev3
|
posted on 6/11/15 at 09:03 PM |
|
|
What are your plans for the side panels?
Did SKCC recommend the Gaz coil overs?
Just wondered as I know the chassis is built by MK and they don't recommend Gaz,they use Protec now.
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 6/11/15 at 10:13 PM |
|
|
Planning on making a vent to cover the gap
The 3" exhaust exit is there too so will build something
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 6/11/15 at 10:14 PM |
|
|
What's wrong with gaz coils
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 8/11/15 at 10:31 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CosKev3
What are your plans for the side panels?
Did SKCC recommend the Gaz coil overs?
Just wondered as I know the chassis is built by MK and they don't recommend Gaz,they use Protec now.
What's wrong with gaz
Why do they not recommend gaz
Did they not use gaz before they changed to protec
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
CosKev3
|
posted on 8/11/15 at 11:14 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rossmcleod
quote: Originally posted by CosKev3
What are your plans for the side panels?
Did SKCC recommend the Gaz coil overs?
Just wondered as I know the chassis is built by MK and they don't recommend Gaz,they use Protec now.
What's wrong with gaz
Why do they not recommend gaz
Did they not use gaz before they changed to protec
Yeah they did use them before.
Drop Danny a message on here and ask why they are better,didn't go into details just said they no longer use Gaz due to Protech being better for
around the same cost.
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 8/11/15 at 04:50 PM |
|
|
A thought u knew that's why your bringing it up
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|
Rossmcleod
|
posted on 19/11/15 at 11:20 PM |
|
|
Here's a few more pics
Spend a few hours the night cutting the other panel and riveting first panel on
Target : 540 BHP per ton :-)
|
|