LoCorun
|
posted on 19/12/05 at 07:53 PM |
|
|
Can't find 1.6mm steel. 1.5 ok?
As in title. I can find loads of places doing 1.5mm thick ERW SHS. Can't find anywhere doing 1.6mm thick which is the metric translation of 16
SWG (What the book says to use). So, is 1.5mm thick ok?
|
|
|
Cita
|
posted on 19/12/05 at 08:36 PM |
|
|
the difference is 1/10th of a millimeter!!!!
or about 0.004 inch!!
Nothing to worry about mate
1.5mm will be just as good as 1.6 mm
Cheers Cita
|
|
RazMan
|
posted on 19/12/05 at 08:45 PM |
|
|
Try telling that to a lady builder
Cheers,
Raz
When thinking outside the box doesn't work any more, it's time to build a new box
|
|
LoCorun
|
posted on 19/12/05 at 09:08 PM |
|
|
Good good, that's what I figured :-). Just thought I should check though. I wouldn't be surprised if the slight difference multiplied by
the 30 ish meters of steel actually made an important structural difference but I guess it doesn't.
|
|
akumabito
|
posted on 19/12/05 at 09:45 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by LoCorun
Good good, that's what I figured :-). Just thought I should check though. I wouldn't be surprised if the slight difference multiplied by
the 30 ish meters of steel actually made an important structural difference but I guess it doesn't.
You'd probably save a few grams!
|
|
Bob C
|
posted on 19/12/05 at 10:55 PM |
|
|
make that 8kg.
Bob
|
|
akumabito
|
posted on 20/12/05 at 06:07 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Bob C
make that 8kg.
Bob
Really? That much huh?
|
|
clbarclay
|
posted on 22/12/05 at 12:26 PM |
|
|
You could just buy imperial SHS and use that instead.
Personally i would go for the stronger box section, unless you realy want as lighter car as possible.
|
|
smart51
|
posted on 22/12/05 at 12:28 PM |
|
|
25mm x 1.5 RHS tub has only 90% of the metal in it as 1" square 16swg. That will equate to 90% of the tensile strength but probably not
torsional stiffness.
|
|