I'm thinking of building a bike engined indy but am put off by the cost - it might be a car engine or nothing,
how fast is a 1.8 sierra engined indy 0-60 and how fast for a bike engined one, just so I can get a feel of how much difference it makes.
blag a ride in both n make your own mind up,
the expression "night n day" springs to mind.
1.8 car engine= prob quickest accelerting car youv'e been in
0.9 bike engine, blow your brains out.
From what other people having mentioned on this site I would say that a well sorted Fireblade car will reach 60 in around 4 seconds. The 1.8 sierra
engine (i'm guessing the CVH is the one you mean) would take somewhere in the region of 7 seconds to reach 60.
Please anyone correct me if I am wrong!
Andy
[Edited on 6/1/05 by andylancaster3000]
if costs putting you off nothing wrong with fitting a car engine then doing a winter upgrade sometime, you won't be dissapointed whatever you fit under the bonnet.
Smart51,
I've sent you a U2U.
As said try both. Bike power works if you build light. The problem with car engine performance is that to get like for like straight line performance is more £££.
If you want a cheap bike engined set up you could go for a CBR1000 or something. It'll gove you slightly less performance than a blade, but will
still be far sharper than 1.8 sierra (as Zetec says, unless you spend lots of cash on it) and can be got for about 200-300 quid. Only problem is
CBR1000 is quite low geared, but if you get the right diff / large wheels tyres that can be overcome.
All the best
Ali
how low is low?
can I just swap a sierra diff for one of a different ratio or do I have to have big (heavy) wheels?
Get OZ superleggera, 7x17's weigh in at under 7kg's!! IIRC
Why do that when the 15's weigh 4.7kg!
I had a 2 litre Ford Transit engine in my Indy and that was fast enough for me. It did 0-60 in under 7 seconds which is deff the quickest car i have
ever owned. I was a passenger in the orig demo GT1 which had a Fireblade engine and that was DAMN quick!!!!!
1st gear was a little short but 2nd and 3rd were awesome, they really pulled the car along with loads of torque!
Everyone i spoke to chose the bike indy after they had compared the two because they are SO quick. There are a few things to consider. I don't
think i could put up with the constant hi rev noise that you get with a bike car, then again i'm more of a V8 man myself.
Also it seems of late that there are a few people crashing their bike engined cars, so it could be down to the lack of weight so they may be a bit
skitish. Also the cost. If you can get all the bike bits you need cheaply then go bike!
I found my Pinto indy to be powerfull enough but many are putting in 150-190bhp Zetec's and Duratec's etc so they will be fast enough i
would think.
Take both out for a spin but think before you buy, can you really afford the bike option.
A thread on build costs may be usefull so you wil see what people have spent in real terms. I think mine came to about £4,500ish
Hope this helps
Andy
[Edited on 8/1/05 by donut]
If you look at Lotus/Cateringvan road test over the years you will get a a fair idea --- even with a 1300GT xflo the acceleration is pretty d*****
good, fit a top stock Sierra engine will give you not far off 200 bhp per ton -- you would have to go a long way to drive a production car with that
ammount of grunt.
In terms of power per pound (both kinds) bike engines are streets ahead but you get a spikey power curve and transmision arangements that to be honest
are a bit "hand knitted".
These days most Locost builders won't have driven many powerful rwd cars let alone a very light one that oversteers and has a very low polar
moment of inertia so maybe a bike engined car isn't a good place to start.
[Edited on 8/1/05 by britishtrident]
quote:
Originally posted by smart51
how low is low?
can I just swap a sierra diff for one of a different ratio or do I have to have big (heavy) wheels?
"...very low polar moment of inertia..."
Eh! What's that then?
ATB
Simon
quote:
Originally posted by Simon
"...very low polar moment of inertia..."
Eh! What's that then?
ATB
Simon
There is an in between engine,small,fast,light and a screaming 8000rpm.It's not quite as quick as a blade but not far off either,and you dont
have to put up with too high a rev range to drive anywhere,And you can run on it's standard injection and ecu so it is cheap to buy and get
running.
Toyota 4age!!!
Sounds gorgeous too!
quote:
Originally posted by DEAN C.
There is an in between engine,small,fast,light and a screaming 8000rpm.It's not quite as quick as a blade but not far off either,and you dont have to put up with too high a rev range to drive anywhere,And you can run on it's standard injection and ecu so it is cheap to buy and get running.
Toyota 4age!!!![]()
Sounds gorgeous too!
You can pickup complete Fwd corollas up for £250-£400 which will get you all the ancilleries, loomand ecu etc.
All you need then is a Toyota rwd corolla box(like hens teeth)or a Ford type 9 and Raw bellhousing adapter.£500-£700 total I would say.Less if you
look around for a smashed car and drop on a cheap T50 box.It's possible to do it for £300 if you really tried.Oh plus the exhaust which you would
have to buy for any engine at £350.
quote:
Less if you look around for a smashed car and drop on a cheap T50 box
I didn't mean it was a cheap box to buy,only if you dropped on one cheaper than normal,hope that makes sense.
They usually go for £100 to£150 and about £250 ish for a recon.
The real problem is finding one,they haven't been built for about 17 years.
If you can find one the ratios are a bit closer than a Type nine Ford box ,which of course is another bonus.
Ah, good, so it's a gearbox that you would recommend, then?
Over here (Manila, Philippines), they're not that common either, but I'm picking up mine for about UK60-80.
The 4AGE 20V silvertop is about UK250, and the blacktop is UK500-600.... I'd like the blacktop, but the silvertop is what I'm getting.
[Edited on 10/1/05 by Alfalfameister]