Board logo

Uh oh
speedyxjs - 24/7/08 at 09:21 AM

Id better go hide


simoto - 24/7/08 at 09:28 AM

Shiver me timbers me hearties!


Mr Whippy - 24/7/08 at 09:32 AM

Sounds a load of hype to me, a bit of scare tactics, I don’t believe a word of it, for a start they don’t have the home addresses of users of things like Lime Wire etc as it’s not required, how are they even suppose to know or prove what you have downloaded and saved rather than just listen to. To charge you they would have to have evidence and just how are they meant to do that?? Bet not a single person ever gets taken to court.


speedyxjs - 24/7/08 at 09:35 AM

They know how much you download


Mr Whippy - 24/7/08 at 10:04 AM

So like every download and upload that is ever made between one computer and another is stored on the service providers system, just imagine the incredible number that would be, it would be in the trillions, I seriously doubt that would even possible. If that was the case then there would be no need for the police to actually seize machines to charge folk. Most if not all people who download inappropriate material from the web are caught by their credit card details and a raid on their house, I don’t think that is going to happen to a teenager downloading some music in their bedroom. Total farce the whole thing.


speedyxjs - 24/7/08 at 10:15 AM

We had a letter from tiscali a few months back saying there is no download limit but if we kept using as much as we were, they would restrict our service.


BenB - 24/7/08 at 10:21 AM

The system is simple Mr Whippy, the british phono people go on limewire, utorrent etc looking for people with UK IP addresses sharing files. They go to the ISP providing that IP, tell them that someone using one of their IPs is file sharing and the ISP sends you a letter on behalf of the british phono people threatening legal action etc etc...


Mr Whippy - 24/7/08 at 10:42 AM

quote:
Originally posted by BenB
The system is simple Mr Whippy, the british phono people go on limewire, utorrent etc looking for people with UK IP addresses sharing files. They go to the ISP providing that IP, tell them that someone using one of their IPs is file sharing and the ISP sends you a letter on behalf of the british phono people threatening legal action etc etc...



and how many years has limewire etc been going? and the ISP hosting that site is really that bothered, oh shock Limewire is sharing files...but we never knew!!

another Tv Licence detector vans, story

where's Chris when you need him, he'll know?? Oh Chris I'm trading and not paying.....! he he

[Edited on 24/7/08 by Mr Whippy]


locogeoff - 24/7/08 at 01:00 PM

Well it's already happening, there has been a case of a young girl who got hammered for donwloading/sharing music.

The reason that people have got away with it up until now is that nobody was really gunning for them, this has now changed, and companies want their justifiable revenue from their products, and are using whatever means possible to acheive their goals, in the same way that users have been flipping between share sights to avoid capture.

It's just the way it is, I personally don't see what the big issue is, if you don't believe the authorities can do what they say they can do feel free to continue, but don't whine when you get the letter inviting you to expain your actions in a court of law.


ozzieboy - 24/7/08 at 09:00 PM

Oh Dear ,

I should not be getting one of these letters as a friend of mine has showed me a great programe called hide IP platinum,
Which hides your ip address so making you un-traceable .... well so i have been told!!!


johnston - 24/7/08 at 09:02 PM

But 1 problem is if you own the original then your allowed a "back-up" copy or to rip them for mp3 players etc etc

so if like us its quicker easier and less hassle to download a backup to stick onto the mp3 player rather than hunt out the cd when we want to listen to it. in that case we're not breaking the law so will be penalised for using a service we pay for????

2 of the mentioned isp provide a freeservice as well as paying customers so obviously its in their interests to slow down usage and carphone warehouse doesnt let torrent programs work proplerly anyway.


stevebubs - 24/7/08 at 09:03 PM

quote:
Originally posted by BenB
The system is simple Mr Whippy, the british phono people go on limewire, utorrent etc looking for people with UK IP addresses sharing files. They go to the ISP providing that IP, tell them that someone using one of their IPs is file sharing and the ISP sends you a letter on behalf of the british phono people threatening legal action etc etc...


I've done some work in the DRM space in one of my previous lives. There's some pretty natty routines around for detecting content and then tracking the distribution. Done properly, the method Ben describes above needs no human intervention...and there is software that will identify files from their content so renaming etc won't work.


stevebubs - 24/7/08 at 09:07 PM

quote:
Originally posted by johnston
But 1 problem is if you own the original then your allowed a "back-up" copy or to rip them for mp3 players etc etc



Actually, strictly speaking you're not...I the eyes of the law, there is no such thing as a "fair use policy". However, the practice that has been going on for so long that it's largely ignored (IIRC, cassette tapes kicked off this argument...)


splitrivet - 24/7/08 at 09:30 PM

quote:
Originally posted by johnston
But 1 problem is if you own the original then your allowed a "back-up" copy or to rip them for mp3 players etc etc

so if like us its quicker easier and less hassle to download a backup to stick onto the mp3 player rather than hunt out the cd when we want to listen to it. in that case we're not breaking the law so will be penalised for using a service we pay for????

2 of the mentioned isp provide a freeservice as well as paying customers so obviously its in their interests to slow down usage and carphone warehouse doesnt let torrent programs work proplerly anyway.

On Radio 2 today they said the back up thing is a fallacy in this country.

A good case for using Peer Guardian its free anyway.
Cheers,
Bob


Liam - 24/7/08 at 09:57 PM

I do really hate the way the poor music industry obviously multiplies the number of songs downloaded by some cost-per-song figure (i.e. 1/10 of a CD or whatever), then claims that is the figure 'stolen' from them, taking food off their tables etc etc. Bless them - brings a lump to my throat. Or at least it might if they weren't making the ludicrous assumption that every song illegally downloaded would have been purchased if the facility to illegally download didn't exist.

I for one use downloading programs mostly to sample stuff I'm interested in finding out about, downloading random single tracks, some old albums etc etc. This often leads to me purchasing stuff I might not have done otherwise (though often second hand from amazon). I simply wouldn't do this if downloading for free wasn't an option - i certainly wouldn't increase my spending on music. The poor, suffering record industry has almost certainly made money from me as a direct result of illegal downloading, and I expect i'm a fairly typical user.

Similarly people who habitually download every new release will simply find a new hobby if that is made impossible - they certainly wont be rushing out and spending half their wages on music. The claimed 'cost' of illegal downloading is pretty much a figment of their imagination. In reality illegal sharing is just a subculture that exists alongside the music industry and does it no real harm. The record industry would probably benefit if they realised that and stopped wasting money trying to fight it. They're just enjoying playing the victim too much.

Liam

[Edited on 24/7/08 by Liam]


DIY Si - 24/7/08 at 10:54 PM

As long as they stick to music and away from films, I'll be fine.