Was gonna put data about these but the Burton website details for the A2 cam does not match that on the sheet, details of whchc I cannot recall
exactly but go something like this:
BCF2 FAST ROAD
in: 37/73 ex: 73/37. FULL LIFT: 9.65 mm DUR. 290deg. 2,500-6,000
A2 FAST ROAD
in 35/70? ex 70/35? LIFT 9.4ish mm DUR 285
3,000-6,500
Also power bands are from memory.
So in summary the A2 has less duration and 0.2 mm less lift vs BCF2, timing is earlier and power band is shifted up 500 rpm. Cam experts should be
able to say what each of these do for power/torque.
So with that little information, which of the two is better for me if I am after best acceleration from low speed and medium speed e.g. overtaking?
Not interested in top speed.
BCF2 lift Inlet 9.69, Exhaust 9.59
A2 lift Inlet 8.86, Exhaust 8.81
The power bands quote in the kent catalogue should be taken with a pinch of salt, it depends heavily on the rest of the engine.
The A2 is a an old cam, I would have expected the more modern BCF2 to be better, but I havne't tried either so can't really say.
I can however recommend the BCF3, gives an impressive gain in power and has very a reasonable idle. This has less duration (284) than the BCF2, but
more lift (about as much lift as you can use without modifying pistons).
Is this a Kent A2 or the Burton power one?
There is a difference.
I was recommended a Kent 234 or 244 by Mr Kent at the Classic motorsports show last year - They said the A2 was much better for the pre crossflow. The
BCF2 is a high torque cam - no bad thing in a seven, but I went for the 244 as Caterham used to use it in their 135bhp Super Sprint.
I can't comment on the other cams, but I used the Burton A2 cam in my 1300 Sport Escort 22 years ago..... ahhh memories.
That went very well and I was pleased with the performance, although I did flow the head and change the pistons.
i went for the bcf3
http://www.race-developments.co.uk/special.htm
£45 from cams
i had an A2 in my xflow way back when too .
teh main difference is the A2 doesnt need valve reliefs in the pistons .
if your stuck about deciding ring East Lincs Motorsport , hell tell you straight away .
bcf2 doesn't need cut outs but bcf3 does.
I think the 234 does as well - need to look up the burtpon cam spec sheet to confirm.
so it seems bcf2 is the "better" opf the two.
BCF3 doesn't need cutouts and is IMO by far best cam for X'Flow without modifying pistons
BCF3 used in my old mark1 no piston mods but a little lumpy at idle, pulled really well
sorry to dig up an old thread but i am searching for a definitive answer to my cam situation, lots of people reckon the bcf3 doesn't need piston mods, i have a 1300 fwd crossflow with a bcf3 fitted, +40 pistons and i have about 1mm pv clearance, been told i should have them machined, it also has an adjustable cam sprocket, could this be adjusted to gain more clearance?
quote:
Originally posted by ande
it also has an adjustable cam sprocket, could this be adjusted to gain more clearance?
quote:
Originally posted by ande
sorry to dig up an old thread but i am searching for a definitive answer to my cam situation, lots of people reckon the bcf3 doesn't need piston mods, i have a 1300 fwd crossflow with a bcf3 fitted, +40 pistons and i have about 1mm pv clearance, been told i should have them machined, it also has an adjustable cam sprocket, could this be adjusted to gain more clearance?