Alez
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 09:44 AM |
|
|
Nice transaxles for small cars?
Hi All,
I'm having a first preliminary think about a spaceframe Mini project. I'd like a car mid engine and was thinking about the transmission.
Most of these cars use a FWD set, the ZCars VTec for instance being very similar to the Atom and using the Honda Civic engine and gearbox. I
don't like this because it makes the engine sit high and quite to the rear. I think the engine position this gives is poor compared to the chain
driven ZCars R1 or similar cars. For car engine, I like it Retoga Zetec style:
These use a transaxle from Elite Racing Transmissions. I think Hewland has similar transaxles available as well.
I'd like to have any comments from you.
Any experience with these?
What engine(s) would I want to look at? (I'd like a proven solution I can use for reliable 200 bhp, I was thinking Honda Civic, Toyota 4A-GE,
Zetec, Duratec as these are well known.)
Are these LSD diff?
What's a "H pattern dog box"? (I thought Hs were sincromesh and sequentials were dog but I've seen one or two described like
"H dog" on the web. I like it quick and sequential as one would imagine.)
Any other makes?
How do I know which transaxle goes well with which engine in terms of adapting it and also in terms of torque? (I'm looking at a 700..750 kg car
I'd think, with Mini dimensions, maybe 195 or so tyre width and so on.)
I know these will be expensive to very expensive, but any rough ideas of cost?
Cheers,
Alex
|
|
|
tegwin
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 09:55 AM |
|
|
Thats a pretty tidy setup...I like...
Have you considered the VAG transaxle as shown in the 1.8T passat, Audi A4 etc?
How about simply using the passat/a4 as the donor....you can tune the 1.8T engine to about 350hp if you have the inclination
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would the last person who leaves the country please switch off the lights and close the door!
www.verticalhorizonsmedia.tv
|
|
Fatgadget
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 10:14 AM |
|
|
Nice.But £8,000
[Edited on 27/5/08 by Fatgadget]
|
|
Alez
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 10:40 AM |
|
|
quote: Have you considered the VAG transaxle as shown in the 1.8T passat, Audi A4 etc?
Interesting..
Is it this one? Not sure the rear would fit in a Mini but looks good for similar enough projects?
quote: Nice.But £8,000
Now that's a show stopper
|
|
Alez
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 10:49 AM |
|
|
What do Elises and Exiges use? Just the original gearbox that comes with the engine? i.e. Rover K, Toyota..
|
|
worX
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 11:06 AM |
|
|
You can get second-hand hewland gearboxes that may already have ford gearbox mounting adaptors from around £1500GBP but they will need rebuilding
aswell...
Steve
|
|
Minicooper
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 11:14 AM |
|
|
I think it will be very tight for space, the seats would have to be well forward and I'm not sure you would get the overhang of the gearbox at
the rear in either
I can do a few basic measurements if you want
Cheers
David
|
|
coozer
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 11:16 AM |
|
|
Beetle or VW camper??
1972 V8 Jago
1980 Z750
|
|
Fatgadget
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 11:24 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by coozer
Beetle or VW camper??
Dont you have to turn those upside down with all the attendant problems or something?
|
|
tegwin
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 11:50 AM |
|
|
Dont think you have the right VAG tranny there...
The one I found at my local scrappy (£250) was pretty short....
But as has been said...perhaps too long for a mini!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would the last person who leaves the country please switch off the lights and close the door!
www.verticalhorizonsmedia.tv
|
|
Mr Whippy
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 11:54 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Fatgadget
quote: Originally posted by coozer
Beetle or VW camper??
Dont you have to turn those upside down with all the attendant problems or something?
as far as I can remember thats not the case as seen in formula v cars. Note the later cars 1303 etc have proper suspension as per the 911's with
normal UG's on the driveshafts if your not keen on the funny swing axle idea.
[Edited on 27/5/08 by Mr Whippy]
Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet
|
|
finlay
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 12:00 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by worX
You can get second-hand hewland gearboxes that may already have ford gearbox mounting adaptors from around £1500GBP but they will need rebuilding
aswell...
Steve
can you give any sites they would be on sale on ?
cheers
|
|
Alez
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 12:22 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MinicooperI can do a few basic measurements if you want
Very kind of you David but for now it's just putting together a few thoughts so don't bother just yet. It's more this kind of
discussion we are having what I was looking for just now
Cheers,
Alex
|
|
Mr Whippy
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 01:06 PM |
|
|
Saab 900, Renault and Audi also have used that layout. You might consider even using an automatic transmission as this will do away with the complex
gear lever linkage and will effectively give you instant acceleration at the lights. You can also wire the modern electrically controlled ones up to
paddle shifts.
Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet
|
|
Dusty
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 03:33 PM |
|
|
The beetle/transporter transaxles live with the engine behind the axle and the box in front. So yes you do have to invert if you want the engine in
front of the axle. Same with the porsche ones. I'm sure I remember an article in PPC a few months ago which also looked at alfa trannys.
|
|
Volvorsport
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 04:23 PM |
|
|
std beetle boxes need strengthening above 150 hp , and for 15 inch wheels .
www.dbsmotorsport.co.uk
getting dirty under a bus
|
|
Ringius
|
posted on 27/5/08 at 08:55 PM |
|
|
The transaxle pic posted
Shows a quattro box, the 2WD box is much shorter, think away the black part of the transaxle and you get approx size. The 016 transaxle (as fitted in
Audi 80/100/200 is approx 18" from centre of drive-shaft to back-end, the 01E (A4, A6, ...) is shorter still. If interested, I can upload a
couple of drawings of the 016-box into my archive.
As for the beetle transaxle, IIRC - it is possibel to invert(?) the pinion gear and reverse the box without flipping the whole transaxle.
|
|
Fred W B
|
posted on 28/5/08 at 06:23 AM |
|
|
See 016 details in this thread
Tha older smaller Audi "80" used a smaller box that may be more suitable for you
cheers
Fred W B
drive train
[Edited on 28/5/08 by Fred W B]
You can do it quickly. You can do it cheap. You can do it right. – Pick any two.
|
|
Alez
|
posted on 28/5/08 at 08:21 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ringius
the 2WD box is much shorter, think away the black part of the transaxle and you get approx size. The 016 transaxle (as fitted in Audi 80/100/200 is
approx 18" from centre of drive-shaft to back-end, the 01E (A4, A6, ...) is shorter still.
That'd be good news, but from the picture just below it doesn't seem so, that has a smaller black end but then it has another bit attached
to the rear of that
Then again that box seems to take a lot more torque than I'm looking for, so maybe that 01E you mentioned is worth a look?
quote: Originally posted by Fred W B
See 016 details in this thread
Tha older smaller Audi "80" used a smaller box that may be more suitable for you
Yes that 016 is definitely a monster I'll need to have a look at the alternatives you have been suggesting.
I've been looking at your thread and that's a very impressive job Well done!
|
|
Alez
|
posted on 28/5/08 at 08:28 AM |
|
|
I think this is the one mentioned:
Found here:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Audi-A6-80-100-Cab-V6-Coupe-5-Speed-CDX-Gearbox_W0QQitemZ290154113215QQihZ019QQViewItem
[Edited on 28/5/08 by Alez]
|
|
MrFluffy
|
posted on 28/5/08 at 02:11 PM |
|
|
The vw transaxle pinion can be swapped easily to invert the drive direction, I have one here that has a hewland ford adapter plate on it, and it was
immediately apparent as soon as the bellhousing was off..
My vote is for the Renault un1, http://www.un1.co.uk/
The ng9 is a bit shorter, but its weaker too, and the un5 renault master variant has a unchangeable and almost unusable low diff ratio.
Cue scruffy mockup shot :-
[Edited on 28/5/08 by MrFluffy]
|
|
Alan B
|
posted on 28/5/08 at 02:20 PM |
|
|
Anyone spot the "Z" bar on this....the opposite of an anti roll bar......allows roll but stiffens both wheels trying move together...
Irrelevant I know...
[Edited on 27/5/08 by Mr Whippy]
|
|
Alez
|
posted on 28/5/08 at 03:23 PM |
|
|
quote: My vote is for the Renault un1, http://www.un1.co.uk/
Is that not massive for the application in terms of weight, size and torque rating? That box is used for V8 applications all the time I think..
Let's have a look at that NG9
[Edited on 28/5/08 by Alez]
|
|
Alez
|
posted on 28/5/08 at 08:52 PM |
|
|
This pic shows the UN1 and NG9 side to side. The NG9 is a lot weaker (likely more suitable in terms of weight), but both look unsuitable because of
their length
Found here (Renault Medallion = 21):
http://www.gt40s.com/forum/gt40-tech-powertrain-transaxles/19659-renault-medallion-transaxle.html
Rescued attachment UN1.jpg
|
|
cymtriks
|
posted on 1/6/08 at 05:08 PM |
|
|
From the original post I think what is wanted is a cheaper transaxle than a Porsche G50 that can be inverted.
I have looked at several forums and done a search for this but apart from the G50 I cannot find any examples of a smaller transaxle being inverted.
The VW Beetle, Renault UN1 and the alfa transaxles are all getting on a bit now. They may well be up to the job but finding one might be an issue!
The obvious choices are:
Audi (which I can find nothing regarding inverting) and Porsche (which can be inverted but it is big, heavey and expensive) and Subaru (not common in
2wd)
Does anyone know otherwise?
[Edited on 1/6/08 by cymtriks]
|
|