Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Reply
Author: Subject: MK shortened sump capacity
iscmatt
Contributor






Posts 1929
Registered 30/3/06
Location York
Member Is Offline

Photo Archive Go!
Building: - BUILT - 2.0 pinto indy, Kent Cam, zzr1100 carbs

posted on 9/6/08 at 10:02 PM Reply With Quote
MK shortened sump capacity

how much oil do you put into your MK shortened sump??

Just out of interest, thanks

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
eccsmk

posted on 9/6/08 at 10:32 PM Reply With Quote
for what engine would that be ?






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
indykid

posted on 9/6/08 at 10:36 PM Reply With Quote
i'm gonna take a wild stab at a pinto as it says in his profile at the left of his post.

as for capacity, i don't know. i fill it to the line on the dipstick. it's probably a bit less than 4 litres though from very approximate memory

tom






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
eccsmk

posted on 9/6/08 at 10:58 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by indykid
i'm gonna take a wild stab at a pinto as it says in his profile at the left of his post.

as for capacity, i don't know. i fill it to the line on the dipstick. it's probably a bit less than 4 litres though from very approximate memory

tom

well spotted

ill go sit in the corner again






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
iscmatt
Contributor






Posts 1929
Registered 30/3/06
Location York
Member Is Offline

Photo Archive Go!
Building: - BUILT - 2.0 pinto indy, Kent Cam, zzr1100 carbs

posted on 10/6/08 at 07:07 AM Reply With Quote
sorry yeah, for a pinto
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
bob

posted on 10/6/08 at 08:45 AM Reply With Quote
If you have the version with the wing on the side to make up the lost capacity from the chop i would go with the manual, when my pinto was in with a sump altered by martin keenam i ran 3.75L from empty.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
bob

posted on 10/6/08 at 08:46 AM Reply With Quote
the old sump Rescued attachment MK Indy build pics 051.jpg
Rescued attachment MK Indy build pics 051.jpg







View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
iscmatt
Contributor






Posts 1929
Registered 30/3/06
Location York
Member Is Offline

Photo Archive Go!
Building: - BUILT - 2.0 pinto indy, Kent Cam, zzr1100 carbs

posted on 10/6/08 at 09:15 PM Reply With Quote
Ah, mine does not have the wings so i am presuming i need to reduce the amount going into the sump, is there any proven technique in finding out how much oil to put in or is it simply a task of trial and error
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
indykid

posted on 10/6/08 at 11:06 PM Reply With Quote
go with the dipstick. the max is max for a reason and the min is min for a reason.

you just need to check it more religiously as there will be less capacity betwen max and min.

tom






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
iscmatt
Contributor






Posts 1929
Registered 30/3/06
Location York
Member Is Offline

Photo Archive Go!
Building: - BUILT - 2.0 pinto indy, Kent Cam, zzr1100 carbs

posted on 10/6/08 at 11:30 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by indykid
go with the dipstick. the max is max for a reason and the min is min for a reason.

you just need to check it more religiously as there will be less capacity betwen max and min.

tom



I was unsure though that my dipstick has been adjusted to suit the shortened sump which may be contributing to my oil problem - different thread.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
bigpig

posted on 1/10/08 at 08:46 PM Reply With Quote
I'm taking the assumption that the dipstick measures somewhere around the bottom of the crank.

Isn't the oil supposed not catch on the con rods or something to stop it being foamed up?

If it is so then I would guess that a standard dipstick measurement should be correct, but hopefully someone knows for sure.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
procomp

posted on 2/10/08 at 07:36 AM Reply With Quote
Hi.

As mentioned re the dipstick. I doubt they will have chopped enough of the dipstick to eliminate the MAX marking. In wich case you still fill to the MAX mark as origanly done by Ford. As this will give the oil a level that will be safe to run with sufficient clearance to the crank.

IE you are effectively measuring from the crank to your oil level rather than the base of the sump to your oil level if that makes sense.

Cheers Matt






View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.