Board logo

Who's Building a ZX10R Car?
birt - 2/2/07 at 11:17 PM

My Phoenix has just arrived in Australia 5 months after my move so it is time to start the ZX10R transplant.

Just wanted to see who elso was doing a ZX10R car and share experiences. I have been working on a wiring diagram for a while now and also have some ideas about a neat oil cooler take off.

Do we know of anyone who has completed one yet?


bigrich - 2/2/07 at 11:30 PM

i,m three weeks into my zx10 MAC#1 build i,m using an 06 motor which i hope to have running in about 5 weeks or so.
i,m using a us spec loom and ecu so there is no immobiliser system to bypass just the usual anti hotwire device to get round with a resistor.

i.m sure Paul Fisher will be along soon, he's doing a ZX10 turbo MK indy

Rich


PAUL FISHER - 2/2/07 at 11:33 PM

There's me,and "bigrich" fitting 06 zx10r's,not sure if there's anyone else at the moment,bigrich is your man for electrics,Ive not got round to oil cooling bit yet,but on the zx10 theres a main gallery just to the right of the oil sight glass,and a return bung,on the other side of the block under the generator cover.

I wish I could type faster

I am using same US spec loom,I also imported my engine from the US too.

[Edited on 19/05/04 by PAUL FISHER]


birt - 3/2/07 at 12:08 AM

Nice one guys,

I have a UK spec loom, but I have the barrel so I will be using that and keeping the immobiliser. Will you be using a Power Commander Rich? I recently bought one from back home and it is on it's way over here.

Paul, ZX10R Turbo!? My ZX9R went like a rocket so I was thinking the 10R would be an animal anyway. Having said that, I have bought a complete nitrous oxide system with digital controller in a moment of madness!! But not sure that will ever make it onto the 10R. Are you gonna do the turbo system yourself or get a kit from somebody like Holeshot Racing?

I need to get out to the garage and check out the oil galleries you mention.

What are you guys doing about the 'interesting' gearing? I have a 3.38 Sierra diff and am reluctant to mess with it since it cost a fortune to have built (Quaife ATB). I also don't want to go for big wheels as I am trying to keep the weight (especially un-sprung mass) to an absolute minimum. I have 13" wheels with Toyo R888 205/60/13 tyres and according to my calcs I will only be good for 120mph at 13000rpm in top – which is ringing it out a bit! Do you guys know where the rev limit is?


PAUL FISHER - 3/2/07 at 12:46 AM

I am going to run a power commander on mine,the turbo is a Velocity kit,stage1,just 6 psi to 8psi boost,230 to 250bhp,I am running a 3.38 lsd diff on mine,not sure on wheel size as yet,wanted to go 13" 205 60 13,but gearing and traction,having a re think on that,13750rpm is the limit on the new zx10r's,its the spacing between 5th and 6th which looks very close on the zx10's,but a lot of the new engines,R1's GSXR'S are the same,may look at 225 50 15's on rear,with a 13750 limit should give me + 130mph should be fast enough for most circuits I use,but may still have to look out for a 3.14 diff,will have to wait and see.


Kev99 - 3/2/07 at 08:27 AM

Hi what sump mods have u done etc


locostv8 - 3/2/07 at 08:45 AM

Birt what is the car in your avitar and do you have a URL for them?


hobbsy - 3/2/07 at 02:28 PM

Paul F - very interesting - I've sent you an email. I didn't realise they (Muzzys not Velocity) did 500bhp kits for the ZX10R - feck me!!! See this:



Doesn't mention uprated internals but it surely must have them!?!?


PAUL FISHER - 3/2/07 at 04:46 PM

Email sent,cheers Paul


bigrich - 3/2/07 at 05:18 PM

i'm using a freelander diff with a 3.21 ratio which should give 125ish mph and just over 60 in first
it will be on 13inch rims. as for the power commander not to sure yet i think i;m going to fit a cat and do some emmision checks at work to see if i can get it through sva without, if thats a no go then i'll get my hand in my pocket again

regards bigrich


ChrisGamlin - 3/2/07 at 06:00 PM

quote:
Originally posted by locostv8
Birt what is the car in your avitar and do you have a URL for them?


As it says below the avatar, a Stuart Taylor (STM) Phoenix

Stuart Taylor Motorsport

[Edited on 3/2/07 by ChrisGamlin]


birt - 4/2/07 at 12:56 AM

This turbo talk has got me very interested. I think I would struggle to package it under the Phoenix bonnet though. It is a lot easier to incorporate a bulge into a Locost bonnet than it is on a Phoenix. Having witnessed Chris Cook spend months making his Phoenix bonnet bulge taller to clear his XE engine, I am not sure I can go through all of that.

Paul, would it be possible to take a photo head-on of your engine bay so I can get a feel for where clearance might be an issue. As you can see from my pics, I already have a cut-out for the air filter so this could be similar for the plenum but it looks like the air pipe feeding the plenum from the turbo would be my biggest problem. I wander if it could be modified to come around the back of the engine and up into the underside of the plenum instead of up and over the cam cover??

Are you expecting problems with emissions for SVA?

Kev99: I have had my sump shortened, I will dig it out and take some photos and put them in my archive.

Marc


PAUL FISHER - 4/2/07 at 01:43 AM

It sticks up about 4" higher than the airbox did Marc,I will have to cut out the MK bonnet,you could turn the plenum the other way round and make some pipes up,I just thought it best to keep things tight neat and compact,I will take another better frontal picture when I get chance,I can't forsee any problems with emissions of a turbo engine through sva,cheers PAUL


G.Man - 4/2/07 at 11:50 AM

quote:
Originally posted by hobbsy
Paul F - very interesting - I've sent you an email. I didn't realise they (Muzzys not Velocity) did 500bhp kits for the ZX10R - feck me!!! See this:



Doesn't mention uprated internals but it surely must have them!?!?



SUmmat don't look right with that dyno track...

Surely the torque and BHP graphs should cross at 5252 rpm not 6750??

Also the dip in BHP doesnt correspond with a dip in torque, well not one sufficient to create that dip in bhp...

By my calculations, the BHP at 9500 rpm should only be reading 361bhp not 450bhp... torque x rpm/5252

Maybe its showing rwt and cbhp and has a 20% loss in the drivetrain, but thats a LOT for a bike?????


bigrich - 4/2/07 at 01:19 PM

look at the graph again the thick red 500 hp and the thin red torque traces dont go down that low and the blue 230 hp/109 torque traces only start at 5250 rpm
Rich

[Edited on 4/2/07 by bigrich]


G.Man - 4/2/07 at 04:17 PM

Yes I know that, I am not quite that dumb

But that means they shouldn't cross at all, they should be already diverging and the bhp should never be below...

Also if you look, the ambient temp is just above freezing with 26% humidity..

Not your typical real world figures either...

Whole thing just looks a bit iffy imho...

At the point the BHP line starts, ie 6250 rpm, the engine is putting out 90ft/lbs which is 107bhp yet the graph only shows 65ish bhp...

65 bhp would be 54ft/lbs at 6250 rpm.. ie roughly the torque at 5252 rpm!

That would make the BHP and torque figures more in line... at the bottom at least...


chriscook - 4/2/07 at 07:12 PM

I've still got the mould! Would be happy to lay one up for you.

I can't believe you're thinking of turboing it when you've only just got it over there - especially when you got all the NOS kit waiting to go on.

Hang on actually I can


G.Man - 5/2/07 at 06:23 AM

Duh..

Yes that must be it..

Well spotted Chris..

I'll close the door quietly as I go



PS. The temperature of the run still applies, I cannot imagine many people using all that power in near freezing conditions



[Edited on 5/2/07 by G.Man]


birt - 5/2/07 at 08:56 AM

Emission is going to be my biggest problem with respect to passing the Aussie Design Rules (ADRs). Unlike the UK, kit-cars have to meet the same emissions targets as new cars which are very strict. I will have to pay quite a bit of money to have my car subject to a full emissions cycle dyno test and then probably repeat it a few times having fiddled with the Power Commander until (fingers crossed) I pass. Do you reckon it will help or hinder my chances if I turbo-charged? I know turbo-charging is more efficient per horsepower but does anybody know if it will be easier to get the overall emission levels down with forced induction? Obviously, the engine map will be changed to full power as soon as it gets the pass certificate.

I few other questions Paul, if I may. How are you intending on getting a good flow of air down to the compressor intake? (some long ducting from the front?) How is the exhaust going to be laid out? It looks like it will come forward out of the turbine so are you going to have a U-bend and exit the side of the engine bay where it normally would?


G.Man - 5/2/07 at 10:13 AM

quote:
Originally posted by birt
Emission is going to be my biggest problem with respect to passing the Aussie Design Rules (ADRs). Unlike the UK, kit-cars have to meet the same emissions targets as new cars which are very strict. I will have to pay quite a bit of money to have my car subject to a full emissions cycle dyno test and then probably repeat it a few times having fiddled with the Power Commander until (fingers crossed) I pass. Do you reckon it will help or hinder my chances if I turbo-charged? I know turbo-charging is more efficient per horsepower but does anybody know if it will be easier to get the overall emission levels down with forced induction? Obviously, the engine map will be changed to full power as soon as it gets the pass certificate.

I few other questions Paul, if I may. How are you intending on getting a good flow of air down to the compressor intake? (some long ducting from the front?) How is the exhaust going to be laid out? It looks like it will come forward out of the turbine so are you going to have a U-bend and exit the side of the engine bay where it normally would?


In the UK we have to meet the current new car emmissions requirements as well HC, CO etc... But I we dont go thru a full dyno run... just idle and fast idle.. we only get 2 runs to get it right max..

I think its better to get the car thru the test with a stock motor then add the turbo/supercharger later..



[Edited on 5/2/07 by G.Man]


PAUL FISHER - 5/2/07 at 01:53 PM

quote:
Originally posted by birt


I few other questions Paul, if I may. How are you intending on getting a good flow of air down to the compressor intake? (some long ducting from the front?) How is the exhaust going to be laid out? It looks like it will come forward out of the turbine so are you going to have a U-bend and exit the side of the engine bay where it normally would?


Ive got a couple of options,I could just put a 90 degree elbow,cut through the side,Dax busa turbo's tend to use this method,but it leaves the filter exposed to water spray,or I could cut a hole through the bulk head and extend the filter into the footwell,it would then draw still cold air,although it may be a little noisey.
As for the exhaust,just a 180 degree return pipe down the side of the car,onto a stock exhaust,cheers Paul


welderman - 5/2/07 at 02:04 PM

Looking good Paul, i see there is no intercooler. Is there no need for one.


PAUL FISHER - 5/2/07 at 02:40 PM

They say not Joe on a low boost set up,6/8psi,the idea is to get it into the engine as quick as possible,no long runs of alloy pipes to get heat soak on the way too and from the intercooler,less lag,if your running higher boost then a intercooler would need to be fitted to stop detonation,but this is all a learning curve as I go along,and could be a expensive one,we will have to wait and see


welderman - 12/2/07 at 12:39 PM

Does the plenum chamber have any internals at all. Or is it just a triangular box?.


jkarran - 16/2/07 at 10:32 AM

Paul,

I have similar concerns over the inlet location and IC air inlet ducts on my Striker, I did think about putting ducts in the lower ally panels like I've seen on some turbo BECs but I figured they'd rapidly fill with stones and muck. Living in the country it's hard enough to keep mud and general B road detritus out of the cockpit!

I think I'd opt for the noisier footwell solution so long as it leaves space for feet! I would however box it in, if your turbo blows your passengers feet would get blowtorched

I'm bringing the SC inlet up and am going to form an airbox between scuttle and bonnet, it will draw air from the trailing edge of the bonnet, not ideal as it's a low pressure region and will be noisey, but at least its cold air and it couldn't get much noisier anyway! Best compromise on mine I think. Could you do something similar?

jk

[Edited on 16/2/07 by jkarran]


PAUL FISHER - 16/2/07 at 12:32 PM

quote:
Originally posted by welderman
Does the plenum chamber have any internals at all. Or is it just a triangular box?.


U2U SENT


PAUL FISHER - 16/2/07 at 12:55 PM

quote:
Originally posted by jkarran
Paul,

I have similar concerns over the inlet location and IC air inlet ducts on my Striker, I did think about putting ducts in the lower ally panels like I've seen on some turbo BECs but I figured they'd rapidly fill with stones and muck. Living in the country it's hard enough to keep mud and general B road detritus out of the cockpit!

I think I'd opt for the noisier footwell solution so long as it leaves space for feet! I would however box it in, if your turbo blows your passengers feet would get blowtorched

I'm bringing the SC inlet up and am going to form an airbox between scuttle and bonnet, it will draw air from the trailing edge of the bonnet, not ideal as it's a low pressure region and will be noisey, but at least its cold air and it couldn't get much noisier anyway! Best compromise on mine I think. Could you do something similar?

jk

[Edited on 16/2/07 by jkarran]


I can understand your concerns jk about fire risk bringing it through the bulk head,but it will be mounted behind a alloy foot rest,although I am not expecting turbo failure,the turbo is designed to run at up to 30psi and 400 bhp,so its not going to be too stressed at 6 to 8 psi,I would also think that if it did fail most of the debri,engine bits,fuel and oil would exit the exhaust side,hopefully I won't have to test my theory
I did spot a Dax with a set up like you discribe,are you thinking something like this Rescued attachment IMG_1469-749932.jpg
Rescued attachment IMG_1469-749932.jpg


birt - 16/2/07 at 08:48 PM

If the turbo you are using is designed for 30 psi, is there not scope for using a smaller one to save weight, it looks quite hefty? Do you knlow the weight of the turbo unit?


PAUL FISHER - 16/2/07 at 09:24 PM

Ive not weighed the turbo on its own birt,but the whole turbo kit weighs only 9kgs!!,and that included the box it came in,so I suppose a smaller turbo could weigh a kg less,as most of it alloy it is very light anyway.also you have still got scope for engine modifications in the future and turn up the boost


welderman - 16/2/07 at 10:28 PM

Just could not help myself, this it part of todays welding session.. Rescued attachment v.jpg
Rescued attachment v.jpg


welderman - 17/2/07 at 12:09 AM

Yup Chris, going to have a go, sold the mini on Monday so decided to take the plunge and go for boost. pictures now in archive and all comments good or bad welcome from fellow builders. Bt the way ive asked Mr Fisher wether its a problem the turbo being so flose to the blade engine see picture (8mm close).
JoeImage deleted by owner


welderman - 17/2/07 at 12:19 AM

Ah good thinking there, i knew this forum would come in handy, see the sprint is coming on too.


PAUL FISHER - 17/2/07 at 12:22 AM

Should not be a problem mounted close to the engine Joe,the instructions for the kit Ive got tells you to mount it as close to the block as possible,you can ajust this distance on mine by tightening the top set,or bottom set of header studs first.


welderman - 17/2/07 at 12:26 AM

Thats a weight from my mind now, after fabing up the headers today i though i was gong for a cut and shut, how did your close ups go.(ooh er)


PAUL FISHER - 17/2/07 at 12:35 AM

I will take some close up's in the morning and post them in my archive of the oil feed,and return,by the way your turbo looks bigger than mine
Also with the compressor being on the front of the engine now,it should make the job of a link pipe up to your plenum easy,or are you going for a intercooler


welderman - 17/2/07 at 12:44 AM

quote:
Originally posted by PAUL FISHER
I will take some close up's in the morning and post them in my archive of the oil feed,and return,by the way your turbo looks bigger than mine
Also with the compressor being on the front of the engine now,it should make the job of a link pipe up to your plenum easy,or are you going for a intercooler




sorry.




I have purchased an inter-cooler but as yet not sure im going to fit it. I could always fit it later.
Should get good air to the turbo too and as for the plenum, yes should be straight forward, But ive been told i need to block some holes up in the boddies, ?.?. Aint sure which ones, i though that if i pressurise the cmplete set of boddies that would be ok, then a buypass to the flost chambers.


birt - 19/2/07 at 01:55 AM

Paul, can the velocity kit be setup with the compressor pointing forward like welderman's? This would make it easier to feed with air via ducting from the front and also make it easier to route the exhaust off the turbine (ie no need for an 180 deg u bend)? It looks like it might be a clearance issue with the lower chassis rail though.

Have you found that the engine has to sit higher relative to the chassis to make room for the turbo or is it where it would be if there were no turbo fitted?

Marc


PAUL FISHER - 19/2/07 at 03:56 PM

Ive not tried it the other way round Marc,don't see any major reason why it could not be adapted to fit,it would need some major re-routing of the compressor side though as I think it would then be very close to the block under the headers .aIthough I can't see a problem with a 180 degree bend in the exhaust,or the routing of the induction straight through the bulkhead.Most other kits have this standard configuration
The engine was positioned and fitted before I got the turbo kit,so height wise its in the "normal" position,I did move it across to the o/s a extra 2" to give clearance for the turbo on the n/s,it was all gess work,it just so happened the turbo fitted ok Rescued attachment IMG_1469-749932.jpg
Rescued attachment IMG_1469-749932.jpg