I've got a 14" and 2 x 7" curved blade fans (from McGill Motorsport) on my radiator, they're set up as pushers and the surrounds
are on a strong rigid frame that holds them virtually touching the core - there's probably only a couple of thou clearance if that to minimise
air loss between the surround/core gap. The flanges on the surrounds were bigger than I thought so I've trimmed to fit round the top and bottom
tanks and I've filled the gaps with black polyurethane sealer.
When the fans are on you can feel air blowing out the back of the radiator and place a hand in front of the fan near the middle and you can feel it
sucking if you see what I mean.
Now here is the weird thing - move your hand to the front outside edge of the fan surround and air is being blown out! Its as if the blades suck air
in and resistance through the core means there is enough pressure to force air back out through the gap between the fan blade tips and the
surround.
Has anyone else had this happen? If so, what did you do?
I'm thinking, either lining the inside of the surround with something to reduce the blade-to-surround clearance (but by how much?) or block off
the outside edge of the fan grills to redirect the escaping air back into the fan (would that work?) or something else?
Won't the airflow when you're driving be different anyway? You're replicating the engine cooling itself down when you're stuck in traffic and the temperatures are going up. When you're driving normally there should be (reasonably) equal atmospheric pressure on all parts of the radiator.
quote:
Originally posted by nobrakes
I've got a 14" and 2 x 7" curved blade fans (from McGill Motorsport) on my radiator, they're set up as pushers and the surrounds are on a strong rigid frame that holds them virtually touching the core - there's probably only a couple of thou clearance if that to minimise air loss between the surround/core gap. The flanges on the surrounds were bigger than I thought so I've trimmed to fit round the top and bottom tanks and I've filled the gaps with black polyurethane sealer.
When the fans are on you can feel air blowing out the back of the radiator and place a hand in front of the fan near the middle and you can feel it sucking if you see what I mean.
Now here is the weird thing - move your hand to the front outside edge of the fan surround and air is being blown out! Its as if the blades suck air in and resistance through the core means there is enough pressure to force air back out through the gap between the fan blade tips and the surround.
Has anyone else had this happen? If so, what did you do?
I'm thinking, either lining the inside of the surround with something to reduce the blade-to-surround clearance (but by how much?) or block off the outside edge of the fan grills to redirect the escaping air back into the fan (would that work?) or something else?
quote:
Originally posted by Slimy38
Won't the airflow when you're driving be different anyway? You're replicating the engine cooling itself down when you're stuck in traffic and the temperatures are going up. When you're driving normally there should be (reasonably) equal atmospheric pressure on all parts of the radiator.
quote:
Originally posted by Bluemoon
Your hand is not a great indicator of flow, use smoldering cigarette or joss stick similar and check again. Your had is large enough to effect flow etc..
quote:
Originally posted by nobrakes
quote:
Originally posted by Slimy38
Won't the airflow when you're driving be different anyway? You're replicating the engine cooling itself down when you're stuck in traffic and the temperatures are going up. When you're driving normally there should be (reasonably) equal atmospheric pressure on all parts of the radiator.
Agreed, it isn't a problem when driving and maybe I'm worrying about nothing because when I held it at 2000rpm for 20 minutes the fans were running full blast and the temperature gauge was showing a steady 90°C.
What I'm wondering about is being on holiday stuck in heavy traffic up a steep hill in the south of France in the summer when I'll be needing every last drop of air to keep a 4.6 V8 cool.
Not sure I follow all that, I prefer pictures to lots of words, so is the diagram below a summary of what you feel is happening?
The blue arrows is what you are concerned about and it would be strange if the radiator was in fee air. I assume it is fitted in a car that has
enclosed sides and top (i.e. bonnet) and engine behind it - the air has to exit somewhere and it appears to want to go back through the radiator.
Providing the temperatures is maintained at idle when fans are running there is nothing to worry about; ensure the hot air can get out
easily.
Due to the hysteresis in the fan switch, the fans usually will run for a while, then stop and then run again; if they don't stop at all, then
that is a sign the cooling is not up to scratch.
Unless you have the resources of a large manufacturer who has access to a test department and all data for engine, radiator etc. it is almost pure
guess work as to what radiator will suit each engine; generally people shout polo and that is fine in most cases and that is only based on the
experience of others. You won't know if the cooling is sufficient for extreme situations unless the car is subjected to them.
I don't know how good the ancient Smiths temperature gauge is but I used an 82° thermostat. The fan switch is low speed on at 88°/off at 83°,
high speed on at 92°/off at 87°.
Also, there's no engine driven fan so I suppose the electric ones are bound to come on sooner or later when stationary.
I was bedding in the cam running it at 2000rpm on the driveway (luckily the neighbours didn't mind the noise) so I think that's why all the
fans were running fast, normally there'd be no reason to run the engine like this.
Turner Engineering put 4 temperature sensitive stickers on the core plugs in the engine block, during this run the 88° bit changed to black but the
next bit labelled 99° was still white so the engine was over 92° but under 99 if the fan switch and indicator strips are accurate.
I've since left it on the driveway running on tickover (which was around 850rpm, I've since lowered it a bit) and eventually the fans did
cut in and out at low speed, they were on for longer than they were off but its a brand new engine so maybe I should expect it to run a bit hotter
than usual until its properly run in?
All in all, I'm reasonably confident that the cooling will be ok although I haven't been out on the road yet (first time on the road will be
a trip to the MOT station this week), its just that I'd like to try and get as much air from the fans as possible through the radiator for those
stuck in traffic in a heatwave moments.
quote:
Originally posted by 02GF74
Not sure I follow all that, I prefer pictures to lots of words, so is the diagram below a summary of what you feel is happening?
See, that is why i like pictures.
So what i understand now is there is a gap of 2 inches between fan blades and shroud?
That is bad, the gap should be minimal as air will take path of least resistance, which is not through radiator..... as you seem to have
discovered.
You need to fit correctly sized shroud or larger fan so there is no gap.
Let me find a picture of what i mean. See on this page
http://calsonic.com/en/products/engine-cooling/fan-shroud
Two fans sitting in a hole in the shroud that are just a bit bigger than the fan blades.
[Edited on 11/7/16 by 02GF74]
quote:
Originally posted by 02GF74
See, that is why i like pictures.
So what i understand now is there is a gap of 2 inches between fan blades and shroud?
That is bad, the gap should be minimal as air will take path of least resistance, which is not through radiator..... as you seem to have discovered.
quote:
Originally posted by 02GF74
See, that is why i like pictures.
So what i understand now is there is a gap of 2 inches between fan blades and shroud?
That is bad, the gap should be minimal as air will take path of least resistance, which is not through radiator..... as you seem to have discovered.
You need to fit correctly sized shroud or larger fan so there is no gap.
Let me find a picture of what i mean. See on this page
http://calsonic.com/en/products/engine-cooling/fan-shroud
Two fans sitting in a hole in the shroud that are just a bit bigger than the fan blades.
[Edited on 11/7/16 by 02GF74]
quote:
Originally posted by MikeRJ
Absolutely this. An axial fan without a close fitting shroud waste a lot of airflow by moving the air outwards along the blades like a centrifugal blower.
just had a look at one fan, distance between end of blade and shroud about 1.5 - 2 mm.
I see your picture now.
If the gap is as above, then I would leave it - we can probably assume the fan manufacturers know what they are doing?
If you start to cover the gap, then will that not restrict the flow of air into the fan as the open area is reduced?
Which of the two situations is worse I cannot say.
The radiator matrix should be covered by the cowl, as per the photo I posted and the fan(s) sit(s) in the holes, the air pushed by the fans will pass
through the entire matrix not just a part of it for maximum effieciency, again as done by car manufacturers..
[Edited on 11/7/16 by 02GF74]
Does this help? (Isuppose I should have shown all of the air arrows going through the radiator in the side view with the baffle)
So the fans are "set up as pushers".
This obviously needs the direction of rotation to be correct.
It also requires the fan to be the correct way round, otherwise the fan efficiency suffers.
Are your fans the right way round?
A rotary fan will always impart a centrifugal(centripetal?) force to some of the air-mass so some goes straight through the rad and some goes sideways. Regardless of how tightly the shroud fits some will be blown as you describe. Best answer is to fit the fan behind the rad as a sucker and the problem goes away. It is more efficient in this configuration. Shrouding can be more imaginative also if its behind the rad without reducing airflow through the rad although due to the increased efficiency it doesn't need to be.
quote:
Originally posted by Dusty
Best answer is to fit the fan behind the rad as a sucker and the problem goes away. It is more efficient in this configuration. .
quote:
Originally posted by coyoteboy
Fan recirc
quote:
Originally posted by SPYDER
So the fans are "set up as pushers".
This obviously needs the direction of rotation to be correct.
It also requires the fan to be the correct way round, otherwise the fan efficiency suffers.
Are your fans the right way round?
I had a measure up today and the gap between the blades and shroud on the 7" fans is around 4mm or so which looks like is just too big. Also the
fan is just blades sticking out of a hub, it doesn't have any sort of ring around the outside so all in all I think it's pretty poor
design.
I think the way forward is to reduce the inner diameter of the shroud to only slightly larger than the fan blade diameter.
Maybe a couple of lengths of uPVC tapered edge architrave, bent into a circle and with the tapered edges facing the front and back of the shroud would
do the job.
Are you sure it's that bad? The amount escaping the sides will be orders of magnitude less than the amount going through?
quote:
Originally posted by coyoteboy
Are you sure it's that bad? The amount escaping the sides will be orders of magnitude less than the amount going through?
One simple thing to check is that the fins on the radiator are not distorted, if they are they will interrupt the airflow through the rad.
If you hold the rad up you should be able to see through it, and any patches of twisted / distorted fins will be obvious.
quote:
Originally posted by nobrakes
All in all, I'm reasonably confident that the cooling will be ok although I haven't been out on the road yet (first time on the road will be a trip to the MOT station this week), its just that I'd like to try and get as much air from the fans as possible through the radiator for those stuck in traffic in a heatwave moments.
quote:
Originally posted by nobrakes
Well, it looks like the radiator isn't up to the job after all because when I tried driving at a steady 60-ish the fans came on and were running on full blast continuously so going to see about getting a bigger rad this weekend.
You can't avoid some small leakage back past the blade tips. It happens because there is a gap and there is a pressure difference between front
and back. The shroud massively reduces the loss round the ends of the blades but will never completely eliminate it. It sounds like you have quite a
high pressure ratio front to back as a result of your setup. If you ran the fan in free air you should find that leakage round the blade ends would be
negligible.
As someone has said, make sure the blades are orientated correctly for the desired airflow. If they have a curved aerofoil shape, the concave side
should face the intended air flow direction.
Pic as requested. Looking at it, I've just noticed something. The top hose, running up from the middle of the inlet manifold the across to the
nearside and forwards into the rad, is higher than the top of the rad. That can't be helping.
- the core is about 520mm wide & 370mm tall
- the old engine was from a 1972 Rover p6, I've misplaced the measurements but they had a rad a little bigger than this
- I believe it cooled the old 3.5 v8 but the rad in a P38 with a 4.6 like mine is 570 x 500, thats nearly 30% bigger
- the side plates used to be 'U' shaped, I straightened out the front bend so I could use it to mount the electric fans, the top offside one
is just showing (maybe I could extend them outwards to make scoops, like on the Honda GL1100 model without a fairing?)
- there's an overflow bottle, not an expansion tank
- it looks like there is a lot of room behind the rad but its an optical illusion, there isn't space for a puller style fan
I cannot see the bubble pipe, is it running SU's
On the lump the carbs bolt to there is a 1/4 barb pointing forward that carries water, this needs to go to the top of the rad, if it's blocked
(quite common, have a good poke in it) as it takes the air bubbles that come off the water boiling in the head.
Missing the car will quickly blow out water and overheat,
Rad looks quite big, p38 is designed to tow heavy loads up steep hills, your time on WOT will be very limited so I cannot see this being an issue if
in good condition.