Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: offset engine& prop assembly pics anyone?
Jason Fletcher

posted on 5/3/09 at 10:11 PM Reply With Quote
offset engine& prop assembly pics anyone?

I'm looking whats the best way mount the propshaft to the engine.

Whats method have you used for the short prop to the centre bearing or reverse box?

Currently I have a rubber cush drive which is rigidly fixed to engine end of the prop and a U'J on the reverse box end. I'm not over the moon with this setup because there's always side load on the reverse box and output shaft bearing.

Any pics in anyones archives?

Thanks
Jason

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ReMan

posted on 6/3/09 at 08:12 AM Reply With Quote
Most just use the readily available 'prop adapter flanges' with a custom made prop. and possibly a rubber TRT (shock absorber)built in.
Same for the reverse box to the diff

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
motorcycle_mayhem

posted on 6/3/09 at 08:20 AM Reply With Quote
Those rubber couplings (Nova, etc.) are actually rather good, but they don't like to be out of line at all. 1 degree and they'll start to complain. If you can straighten things up, use it.
Otherwise, you'll need the usual UJ's and splines on the front section, reverse gearbox, and then UJ's and splines on the rear with a TRT. Then you can run whatever angles take your fancy (within reason).
Your bike engine won't mind a side load on the radial output bearing, it's what it's designed for. My experience of reverse gearboxes is that you need to be very careful about bearing loads...

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Jason Fletcher

posted on 6/3/09 at 11:30 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by motorcycle_mayhem
Those rubber couplings (Nova, etc.) are actually rather good, but they don't like to be out of line at all. 1 degree and they'll start to complain. If you can straighten things up, use it.
Otherwise, you'll need the usual UJ's and splines on the front section, reverse gearbox, and then UJ's and splines on the rear with a TRT. Then you can run whatever angles take your fancy (within reason).
Your bike engine won't mind a side load on the radial output bearing, it's what it's designed for. My experience of reverse gearboxes is that you need to be very careful about bearing loads...


I quite like the Nova cush drive but don't like the fact that its used to sort the 3 deg angle out in place of a U.J. I wonder if I could fit the Cush drive between the engine adaptor and a U.J on the prop? that way I get the "cushed" drive and no side load.

Waht do you guys think?

jason

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ReMan

posted on 6/3/09 at 01:16 PM Reply With Quote
Think you're adding weight and breaking points
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Jason Fletcher

posted on 6/3/09 at 01:56 PM Reply With Quote
Unfortunatly I have already got a "breaking point" hence my questions

Jason

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.