Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: emisisions
carnut

posted on 8/1/04 at 01:56 PM Reply With Quote
emisisions

My indybird failed its sva today on emissions due to the CO reding being 1.2.

I have a cat in the exhaust and just wondered what other people have done to get through emissions testing. All the other readings were ok.

any help at all would be greatly recieved.

thanks
carnut

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
JoelP

posted on 8/1/04 at 03:01 PM Reply With Quote
a fuel additive called 'emmision reducer' has worked for me in the past for MOT. If you try this then maybe take it to a local MOT center first to save the trip to the SVA in case it fails!






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
carnut

posted on 8/1/04 at 05:55 PM Reply With Quote
ive just been informed tha it is possible to reduce emmissions with a power commander kit. This will make the engine run lean between 2500 and 3000 rpm for the test.
Does anyone know of this being done?

thanks
carnut

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
bike_power

posted on 8/1/04 at 07:50 PM Reply With Quote
Easiest way is to reduce/increase the fuel pressure via the fuel pressure regulator at a local MOT garage and see what you can get. It's usually possible to get close enough to pass with a friendly SVA chap, but it might run like a pig until you put it back afterwards.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ChrisBradley04

posted on 10/1/04 at 12:26 AM Reply With Quote
Carnut,
Is the reading 1.2 because you aren't running an airbox? I have my SVA in less than 5 weeks and also will be using a cat (from the bike) and assumed if it was OK for the bike then it would be OK in a car.

I had assumed (hoped!) that the ECU map would cope with the extra airflow of not using an airbox. Any details would be great so I can try and avoid a fail on emissions if possible.

Many thanks in advance.
Regards
Chris

www.fisherfury.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
carnut

posted on 10/1/04 at 10:32 AM Reply With Quote
chris,

i am using an airbox as standard because i was worried that i would get running problems if i removed it.

Exhaust is 4-2-1 with a straight thru can but for emmisions testing i have a datona 600 can with a cat in it.

I think mine failed its emmisions because bike emmissions are far less strict than car emmissions.

I think i am going to order a power commander and make it run lean at 2500-3000 rpm. This will also give me a bit more power with my changed exhaust.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ChrisBradley04

posted on 12/1/04 at 10:29 PM Reply With Quote
Many thanks.

Please let me know how the Power Commander set up goes. I can't even use an airbox under the bonnet of the Fury so I may end up with worse emissions than your car. Are you going to set up your Power Commander yourself or get it done professionally?

Regards
Chris

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.