Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: lights for b,e,c, kit car question?
chunky2772

posted on 13/9/10 at 09:39 PM Reply With Quote
lights for b,e,c, kit car question?

engine is a gsxr1000cc,k8 when the engine is in the bike the main lights are on all the time can i leave this set up the same for my car or does the light have to turn off for iva. if lights have to turn off which way would you lot rocommend i wire these to turn on and of by the switch.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
cosmick

posted on 13/9/10 at 09:59 PM Reply With Quote
You do not need to have the lights on all the time. How are you intending to set up your dashboard? I used a MK3 Fiesta indicator switch which runs everything. Horn, Indicators, Lights, Main Beam, Wipers etc. This makes a neat installation and takes care of wiring. If on the other hand you are planning to use the Suzuki switches, then you will either need to rewire the lighting wiring to make them switchable or stick with lights on all the time.
I drive with lights on all the time anyway as you need to be seen in a car a low as a 7.





If it can't be fixed with a hammer then its probably an electrical problem.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
RazMan

posted on 13/9/10 at 11:15 PM Reply With Quote
Either way it is good to remember that your alternator is quite small and you will probably be running twice the lights that the donor bike used to have and running headlights all of the time might be a bit of a challenge for the battery. LED stop/tail/indicators make the most of the power - and after IVA you could even go for HID headlights to really make night driving a pleasant experience.





Cheers,
Raz

When thinking outside the box doesn't work any more, it's time to build a new box

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Strontium Dog

posted on 14/9/10 at 07:30 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
[i
I drive with lights on all the time anyway as you need to be seen in a car a low as a 7.


This USED to be what we were advised to do on a bike when I was a lad. Since then it has been noticed that as you bounce down our pot hole filled roads your headlight appears to flash. This is seen as a signal to pull out by the guy at the next "T" junction who promptly wipes you out. It is now considered very unsafe and lights should only be turned on in poor visibility! This is gonna be just the same in your little sports car IMHO and I wouldn't do it.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mistergrumpy

posted on 14/9/10 at 08:23 AM Reply With Quote
Hey that's a good point actually!
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
adithorp

posted on 14/9/10 at 08:59 AM Reply With Quote
I'd say wire the lights up as you'd normaly have them on a car, via a switch. If you want lights on during the day get a set of LED daylight running lights (like Audi's, etc). You won't get the flashing effect and they'll draw less juice. Check the IVA requirements for them though; they might have to go off when the main lights come on? You don't want HID unless you want to have to build in self leveling (and headlight wash?) as thats required for IVA.

adrian





"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire

http://jpsc.org.uk/forum/

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
coyoteboy

posted on 14/9/10 at 09:00 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
you could even go for HID headlights to really make night driving a pleasant experience.


HID are the bane of society. I hate people with them, I really do. They're meant to self-level - they don't ever seem to work properly and are always glaring. They bounce through potholes like no other light.

Their sharp cut-off of their beam pattern makes them appear to flash at you more than any other light.
On anything as low as a locost you're going to have to aim them more upwards than they're meant to be, which means all these problems get worse.

IMO having insanely bright lights is distinctly selfish and the trend towards them through manufacturers is a joke. Now cyclists and motorbikes struggle to make their presence felt through a glare of floodlights, people think they can drive at stupid speeds on the road at night as they think they can see just as well as in the day and the flashing from them causes confusion with other drivers.

</rant>

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Rocket_Rabbit

posted on 14/9/10 at 01:30 PM Reply With Quote
Flashing your lights is to let other road users know you are there.

If you are a stupid enough person to pull out of a junction on someones flashing of lights alone, you have it coming.

I'd certainly fit HIDs at the drop of a hat.

My visability is paramount and I couldn't give a stuff what joe bloggs is annoyed about on the other side of the road because he isn't going to be the one paying for my written off car when some pi55ed person has thrown a breeze block in the road and I didn't see it until too late.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
coyoteboy

posted on 14/9/10 at 02:48 PM Reply With Quote
Many know flashing your lights is to warn people of your presence. Most do not, and will pull out stupidly. Insurance claims are fine when you're not dead or injured, so that's not a smart stance to take. They might have it coming, but you now have spinal injuries and problems for the rest of your life (yes, I've suffered because of this). I'm sure you could sit in the hospital smugly contemplating how right you were to have bright lights and how you have the moral high ground as you know flashing lights means you're present and they didn't.

It's also considerably less likely for someone to throw a brick in the road in an unlit location than it is for you to dazzle someone into having an accident (possibly involving you).

I just don't understand the logic. It's like an arms race for the brightest lights, no-one wins in the end, we all just drive around having to look away from the road (especially in the wet) because everyone's blinding each other.

If you're not able to see far enough to stop you're driving too fast for the conditions. I can see perfectly well for 60mph with my non-HID, fairly lowly normal 55W headlights. I don't even want to think about how fast you want to drive in a location with pedestrians, such that normal headlights are not sufficient for you to stop.

[Edited on 14/9/10 by coyoteboy]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Rocket_Rabbit

posted on 15/9/10 at 07:24 AM Reply With Quote
I don't have a problem in residential areas because they are well lit and I only do 30.

If there was a way to dim them according to external lighting, not a problem.

But when lighting is poor I would very much like to see as much as possible.

Like I said, I don't give a stuff about Joe Bloggs on the otherside meaning I am not in a willy waving contest over bright lights.

And just like your accident (which I am genuinely sorry to hear about - These twunts that pull out are also ones that pull out from junctions upon people signalling and not waiting until manouver is made), I have come accross and avoided afore mentioned obstacle because my car had HIDs.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
coyoteboy

posted on 15/9/10 at 09:16 AM Reply With Quote
Thanks for your concern, but I still just don't see the point. Unless you have vision problems, I don't see what additional benefit they give you - I can see perfectly clearly all of the road I need to to drive safely at 60mph, even 70. Back in the days of the old circular-headlight rangerovers it was a bit less pleasant I'll admit, but normal modern headlights are perfectly good and don't have the glare/bounce problems. The "I don't give a stuff about others" attitude is what creates the silly situation where everyone has to have brighter lights (I never said it was a willy waving contest). Once you have really bright lights your night vision is trashed, meaning you need brighter lights again to compensate for having been shone at by someone with HIDs, and that's a viscious circle. And if you're looking somewhere outside of your beam (like in bends, or down dips) you actually LOSE vision as the lower brightness area now looks black as you're used to stadium lighting. When you're on a bike (pedal or motor) you really notice that at dusk/dark times if you're the only person out with lights on (and I have a 40W halogen push-bike light, it requires me to carry a 5"x4"x4" lead acid battery about!) you get spotted easily, but amongst cars you vanish as you're a tiny point of dim light against a background of stadium floodlights. That's another reason that the lighting arms race isn't helpful and is in fact a bit selfish. "I want to drive at 60 at night at the same speed as during the day, so everyone else can suffer".

Brighter is not always better. Of course dangerously dim is also not great, but I'm sick and tired of being dazzled by morons with badly adjusted HIDs, being repeatedly strobed by HID's that bounce over the roads, completely losing all night vision when someone with them drives past glaring away. Just because you can have brighter lights doesn't mean you should. I used to be of the same opinion as you, I had 100/130s in my car, until I saw it from the other side and realised my mistake.

[Edited on 15/9/10 by coyoteboy]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
RazMan

posted on 15/9/10 at 12:46 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by coyoteboy
Brighter is not always better. Of course dangerously dim is also not great, but I'm sick and tired of being dazzled by morons with badly adjusted HIDs, being repeatedly strobed by HID's that bounce over the roads,


I can understand the point you are driving at, but a well adjusted HID headlight produces LESS glare than a badly adjusted 100/130W halogen that you had in your car. Cheap bulb replacements are notorious for this, as placing the filament even 1mm out of position on a reflector causes horrendous and spurious dazzle to oncoming drivers. There are a lot of cheap halogens on eBay and they sell in their thousands because they are so cheap but I suspect that HID users are not the majority of 'dazzlers'. Most projector headlights are in fact better designed for HID replacements than filaments (my Lexus for example which has terribly weak lighting for a sportscar) but I will admit that the average boy racer in his Saxo, Nova etc should not fit anything other than a standard bulb (even the high output variety) if they want to avoid dazzling oncoming drivers. Look at the light colour next time you get dazzled and it will probably be a halogen colour, not HID - the difference is quite noticable once you know what you are looking for.





Cheers,
Raz

When thinking outside the box doesn't work any more, it's time to build a new box

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
coyoteboy

posted on 15/9/10 at 04:32 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
produces LESS glare than a badly adjusted 100/130W halogen that you had in your car.


Borderline TBH, but I never said the 100/130's were a better alternative!

quote:
Look at the light colour next time you get dazzled and it will probably be a halogen colour, not HID - the difference is quite noticable once you know what you are looking for.


I'm well aware of the differences in spectral output of the different types of light, all I can say is there must be an aweful lot of badly adjusted HID's out there. I don't generally find badly adjusted halogens any real problem, maybe its because they are brighter all the time and thus your pupils lock down further. But not a huge issue, and I don't notice it affecting my night vision as badly as HIDs. Badly adjusted HID's, or getting flashed by them going over a rise in a road or through a bump, are piercing and horrifically bright. The reason a correctly adjusted one creates less glare is it has a very sharp beam fall-off to prevent it, it's that sharp fall-off that creates the "flash effect" and dazzles you with the flash as your pupils are quiet open for the relatively low ambient.

It's just my opinion of course, but quite frankly I regret the day someone thought of putting HID's in cars. People are bad enough as it is in looking after their cars, a poorly maintained rocket is more dangerous than a poorly maintained rowing boat.

[Edited on 15/9/10 by coyoteboy]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
chunky2772

posted on 15/9/10 at 07:55 PM Reply With Quote
thanks for the replys lads (dident mean to start a war between you lot) ha,ha,
i think i,ll go for standard lights and wire up to an on/off switch. thanks again.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
matt_gsxr

posted on 16/9/10 at 04:12 PM Reply With Quote
on the HID question. I put them on due to alternator limits.

I was worried that they would cause glare, and the self-levelling issue was mentioned.

In practice I don't get flashed by anyone (which is a reasonable test of whether I am blinding people), and the light from them is excellent. The quality of the product I got was very low, but it all seems to work and it was cheap.

Matt

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
coyoteboy

posted on 16/9/10 at 04:13 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
dident mean to start a war between you lot)


Not a war, I just get a bit moany when HIDs are mentioned - sorry for the hijack (though I assumed your answer had been found hence the shift).

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.