UncleFista
|
| posted on 20/5/03 at 12:15 AM |
|
|
Why is this engine not used more ?
I've always wondered why this engine hasn't been used more;
Specs
Engine Type:
1832cc liquid-cooled horizontally opposed six-cylinder
Valve Train:
SOHC, two valves per cylinder
Carburetion:
Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI) with automatic choke
Ignition:
Computer-controlled digital with three-dimensional mapping
Transmission:
Five-speed including overdrive, plus electric reverse
Final Drive:
Shaft
Thats the engine and trans from a 2002 Honda Goldwing 
I know their owners don't go fast enough to crash very often, but even a mild-ish spill could get into "write off" territory once
the GRP has been smashed ?
There's also tuning bits available as it shares an engine with the "Valkyrie" (no GRP).
Reading the specs it could be designed for a light 'kit' type vehicle, I know there must be a reason for not using it, I don't think
I've seen anyone at all using it...
If anyone has a link to any sites showing the Goldwing engine in a car I'd be much obliged 
Ta all
PS. I've noticed that MK mentions on his site that he's used a Goldwing engine, no info though 
PPS. This post is more of a 'cut n paste' job from another catagory on the forum in reply to a boxer engine question, but thought you BEC
chaps might have some more info
Tony Bond / UncleFista
Love is like a snowmobile, speeding across the frozen tundra.
Which suddenly flips, pinning you underneath.
At night the ice-weasels come...
|
|
|
|
|
StuartA
|
| posted on 20/5/03 at 11:28 AM |
|
|
I would have thought the main reason would be the size. I know bike engines are generally compact but if you have ever seen that engine in a Valkyrie
then you will know what I mean. Would have thought the chassis would need some pretty hefty mods to take it... might be an optical illusion though. 
|
|
|
ChrisGamlin
|
| posted on 20/5/03 at 01:05 PM |
|
|
I think a lot of it is the weight, you might as well put a car engine in there if you are thinking of one of those. Also cos its a flat 6, it would
need a lot more space in the engine bay and some fancy / expensive exhausts (note the plural!)
Chris
|
|
|
kingr
|
| posted on 20/5/03 at 02:12 PM |
|
|
Hmmm, is it just my imagination or did Goldwings at one time have V8s in them? They might be good for a look.
Kingr
|
|
|
ChrisGamlin
|
| posted on 20/5/03 at 05:18 PM |
|
|
Just your imagination Im afraid
|
|
|
kb58
|
| posted on 21/5/03 at 03:24 PM |
|
|
I though it was because of the low horsepower, but I don't know how much that is, 100hp or so? They have torque yes, hp, no. Weight is a big
deal as said before. At several hundred lbs for 100hp, you could sub a car engine and get more hp/lb.
There was/is a bike with a Chevy 350 in it.. here it is (I've see others too):
http://www.mtv411.com/motorcycle/pictures/boss-hoss/bosshoss.htm
Saw it on a TV show once and it was "over the top." The camera car was driving along-side it at about 45mph when the bike hit the gas.
Dang impressive to see nothing but a big long skid mark on the road, which is saying something because they use a Really Wide car tire at the back...
Good luck turning the thing though. It was impressive how well that engine fit.
BTW, someone where I work made a V8 bike using the Buick aluminum-block V8. He "discovered" the same thing, that it's hard to turn
when you have basically a square-section tire at the back...
[Edited on 21/5/03 by kb58]
|
|
|
ned
|
| posted on 21/5/03 at 03:41 PM |
|
|
that is completely mad.
beware, I've got yellow skin
|
|
|
GO
|
| posted on 21/5/03 at 03:55 PM |
|
|
8 second quarter mile!!!! 
|
|
|
Scouse Monkey
|
| posted on 21/5/03 at 09:42 PM |
|
|
Here is a BEC that used a Goldwing (a while ago)- not sure you want one of those though - looks like an old Esprit that got reversed into somwhere
very narrow!
Is this one of the 1st BEC kit cars?
Andy
|
|
|
