nitram38
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 12:03 AM |
|
|
Just a taster !
..........of my new project.
(credit for R1 engine and figures to dpcars)
[img][/img]
|
|
|
grahamgg
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 12:07 AM |
|
|
not giving much away then!!![]I think theres a lack or ehh engine mounts
[Edited on 17/2/07 by grahamgg]
|
|
nitram38
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 12:12 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chris mason
very minimalist, wouldn't it be a good idea to at least give the 2 poor sods a seat to sit on
Chris
I would but have you tried to model seats in solidworks !
That front sunframe (for longer front wishbones I might add) is made from 17 parts !
|
|
DIY Si
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 12:18 AM |
|
|
Based on some new anti-grav seats I presume?
“Let your plans be dark and as impenetratable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.”
Sun Tzu, The Art of War
My new blog: http://spritecave.blogspot.co.uk/
|
|
RazMan
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 12:20 AM |
|
|
Some wheels might be useful .... or is it a new kind of Skidoo?
Cheers,
Raz
When thinking outside the box doesn't work any more, it's time to build a new box
|
|
worX
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 12:21 AM |
|
|
He's using the Bose suspension technology and fitting it to the driver/passengers arses...
|
|
nitram38
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 12:27 AM |
|
|
Anyone modelled some seats in Solidworks?
Thought not, smart arses
|
|
welderman
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 12:29 AM |
|
|
is that an R1 engine,
Thank's, Joe
I don't stalk people
http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/forum/23/viewthread.php?tid=172301
Back on with the Fisher Fury R1
|
|
nitram38
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 12:33 AM |
|
|
You can see the air ride suspension better here
And yes it is an R1 engine. Goto DPcars website it you want a free copy.
[img][/img]
|
|
welderman
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 12:46 AM |
|
|
i know i know, it'a s sand buggy from star wars, i always wanted one of those.
Thank's, Joe
I don't stalk people
http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/forum/23/viewthread.php?tid=172301
Back on with the Fisher Fury R1
|
|
diyer
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 12:57 AM |
|
|
Have you sold your old car yet?
Hug a Hoodie!
|
|
Catpuss
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 01:12 AM |
|
|
Ah a new style of hair dryer looking at the positions of those tubes on the motor. Is the front bit a magazine rack ?
|
|
PAUL FISHER
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 02:23 AM |
|
|
Its not a new concept,should look like this when its finished
Rescued attachment popular_science_hoverl.jpg
|
|
scoobyis2cool
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 04:45 AM |
|
|
Is it just me or are both of those blokes steering? That would certainly make for some novel handling...
Pete
It's not that I'm lazy, it's that I just don't care...
|
|
G.Man
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 05:29 AM |
|
|
never mind that, in that seating position they will be crippled in a few miles
Opinions are like backsides..
Everyone has one, nobody wants to hear it and only other peoples stink!
|
|
nitram38
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 06:25 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by diyer
Have you sold your old car yet?
Nope!
I need to find a rented garage to store it.
I am going to do a few shows this year, so hopefully it will sell after people see it.
It doesn't look right in photos, which a few people have been surprised about when they see it for real.
Roll on Detling !
|
|
jollygreengiant
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 10:22 AM |
|
|
might have a problem there with sharp edges at the front when it comes to sva. oh and where are the indicators.
very good. better than I could do at the moment.
Beware of the Goldfish in the tulip mines. The ONLY defence against them is smoking peanut butter sandwiches.
|
|
nitram38
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 12:54 PM |
|
|
indicators? you can use your arms !
|
|
kikiturbo
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 08:11 PM |
|
|
hmm, nice,
here is mine... I made the mistake of not measuring properly how much space I need..... so the front needs to be made longer and rear shorter... when
I get some time to finish my build table I will make some real measurements and a rough lifesize outline of the chasis...
I also made some simulations of the front suspension geometry...so I need to fit those pickup points into my model..
sidepods look dangerous, but add massive torsionall stffness..
|
|
kikiturbo
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 08:17 PM |
|
|
also , you can find usefull models, seats etc. on http://www.3dcontentcentral.com
|
|
nitram38
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 08:31 PM |
|
|
Suspension front inboard cam:
front cam assembly
Rear Cam:
rear cam assembly
Cutaway of front cam spindle:
Front spindle
The bushes will be oilites and a grease nipple will be mated to the cam assembly.
|
|
nitram38
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 08:45 PM |
|
|
These 3 pictures show how useful solidworks is.
I have modelled the suspension to find the optimum angle to mount my wishbones to the chassis.
I need un-equal wishbones that will rest with the bottom of the car at 60-75mm from the road and raise another 75mm with my air suspension without
increasing camber too drastically. The will be camber change but it is kept within acceptable limits. It took a few top wishbone changes to get this
right but you can see from the model that camber gain is not excessive.
wishbone test level
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[Edited on 17/2/2007 by nitram38]
|
|
Mad Dave
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 10:21 PM |
|
|
Why have you chosen to have little or no camber gain?
|
|
nitram38
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 10:33 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Mad Dave
Why have you chosen to have little or no camber gain?
There is camber gain, but if I want to run the car higher, then too much camber will be detrimental to my tires.
I also have adjustable rod ends (custom adjuster) that would enable me to set the car up quickly for track use.
This consists of a metal cup that will be part of the wishbone. The adjuster will be threaded to accept the rod end.
By placing a bar in the end of the adjuster, it can be turned to adjust the rod end in or out. That way the suspension will be spot on instead of to
the nearest half a turn.
Afterwards the adjuster can be lockwired. There will also be a lock nut on the rod end.
rod adjuster
[Edited on 17/2/2007 by nitram38]
|
|
nitram38
|
posted on 17/2/07 at 11:20 PM |
|
|
Sorry I showed the wrong chassis point version. Here is what I will use as a general layout for the rear (only a pivot model) The square plate is only
for inboard suspension location.
[img][/img]
|
|