theconrodkid
|
posted on 18/10/02 at 10:39 PM |
|
|
rear end castor
do you need castor on the rear,wouldnt think so but you never know
|
|
|
interestedparty
|
posted on 19/10/02 at 12:40 PM |
|
|
No mention of it in my suspension book, so I guess it really doesn't matter either way. Are you going to use the original Ford set-up but with the
steering fixed?
John
As some day it may happen that a victim must be found,
I've got a little list-- I've got a little list
Of society offenders who might well be underground,
And who never would be missed-- who never would be missed!
|
|
Alan B
|
posted on 19/10/02 at 06:26 PM |
|
|
No, I think castor is meaningless at the rear!
It is just to help the steering function as far as I know.
It exists of course but may play more part in anti-dive/squat functions.
I wouldn't worry about it, I didn't
|
|
theconrodkid
|
posted on 19/10/02 at 07:14 PM |
|
|
ill set it vertical then,i just want to get all the pickup points in the right place first,yes i am using all the original front on the rear
|
|
Alan B
|
posted on 19/10/02 at 08:26 PM |
|
|
I think that's best, I set mine vertical.
It's complicated enough already without more angles
|
|
theconrodkid
|
posted on 19/10/02 at 09:28 PM |
|
|
complicated?women are complicated,cars are simple machines
|
|
Alan B
|
posted on 20/10/02 at 12:44 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by theconrodkid
complicated?women are complicated,cars are simple machines
Quite possibly the truest, wisest thing ever thing every said on here
|
|
wayner
|
posted on 20/10/02 at 08:39 PM |
|
|
Women are just like machines, press all the right buttons and they will do exactly as asked, press the wrong buttons and they will do exactly as not
asked, the real problem however lies in the 99% of time when you are not pressing any button.
|
|
theconrodkid
|
posted on 20/10/02 at 09:03 PM |
|
|
I prefer my dog,at least you know what he wants,ignores you all the time and only does as i want when its feding time or walkies time and cant go back
to his mother.
|
|
johnston
|
posted on 20/10/02 at 09:14 PM |
|
|
i think if ur usin a mcpherson strut at the rear castor will have anti squat qualities
and if it dont have 4 wheels and four strokes itll be a bitch
|
|
Rorty
|
posted on 21/10/02 at 01:03 AM |
|
|
rear end castor
Camber and toe are the usual areas of concern at the rear end, but induced castor is used for anti-dive.
I wouldn't worry about getting into that, just keep the upper and lower wishbone pivot axis parallel.
Cheers, Bob.
http://www.rortydesign.com
|
|
theconrodkid
|
posted on 21/10/02 at 04:40 PM |
|
|
cheers chaps,onward and upwards!
|
|
stevedenbigh
|
posted on 23/10/02 at 10:27 AM |
|
|
rear caster
I seem to remember the subject of caster on the rear wheels being discussed by Mark Ortiz in his monthly newsletter. You can get his newsletter by
subscribing by sending an e-mail to him at markortiz@vnet.net and you can get back copies by asking him for them at the same address.
BTW, if your wondering who Mark Ortiz is, he's a chassis consultant for racing teams, he really knows his stuff, plus he has a column in Racecar
Engineering Magazine
|
|
theconrodkid
|
posted on 23/10/02 at 02:52 PM |
|
|
Cheers Steve ill have a go.
|
|
Alan B
|
posted on 23/10/02 at 04:06 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by stevedenbigh
............................, plus he has a column in Racecar Engineering Magazine
Excellent magazine...recommended reading
|
|
scuzzer
|
posted on 23/8/03 at 05:40 PM |
|
|
Castor answer
To answer the castor issue, the reason we have castor is to straighten the wheels after turning and letting go. This is positive static stability.
We use the law of gyroscopic precession to take the applied force (the force the road exerts on the tire) and rotate it 90 degrees ahead on the plane
of rotation and exert the force there instead, which pushes the wheels straight again. If this is a bad explanation, go to
science.howstuffworks.com/gyroscope or just search for it in howstuffworks.com
|
|