Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: PPC mag Nov issue ( bec ) comment
TOO BADD

posted on 30/10/08 at 01:36 PM Reply With Quote
PPC mag Nov issue ( bec ) comment

Page 100 quote from Kevin Leaper

' Although I love bike engine cars on the track, for a use on the road they're nearly always a poor second THANKS TO LESS TORQUE AND NO REVERSE !'
Hmm.... cec must be better !

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
r1_pete

posted on 30/10/08 at 01:41 PM Reply With Quote
Hmmm, and there was me thinking the torque and power were just produced at a different part of the rev range.....

With no particular affiliation either way.....






View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
mcerd1

posted on 30/10/08 at 02:30 PM Reply With Quote
all he's saying is that what you BEC boy really want is a metro engine
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
motorcycle_mayhem

posted on 30/10/08 at 02:56 PM Reply With Quote
Perversely the MSA have ensured that I need a reverse gearbox on track, I refit the centre bearing prop for the out-season blats on the road!! It's much quieter, less vibes and just so much better on the road with no reverse gearbox.

Yep, I need a Metro engine, but I'd probably refit a hairdrier unit to the Metro it came from... hmmm... ..... ....

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
indykid

posted on 30/10/08 at 03:25 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by r1_pete
Hmmm, and there was me thinking the torque and power were just produced at a different part of the rev range.....

With no particular affiliation either way.....


decent torque isn't produced by the engine, only by primary reduction, the power is produced as a result of the increased rev range

tom






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
BenB

posted on 30/10/08 at 05:54 PM Reply With Quote


not the same old torque vs BHP discussion.

the answer is they're intertwixed and intertwined. Torque * rpm = BHpower.

If torque was the king of all things supercars would have diesel engines. And as much as I like my turbo diesel it ain't no Lambo..... And yes the Le Mans diesel did very well but that was also partially reduce pit stops...

If Kev reckons his BEC hasn't got enough torque then he's not using his rev range properly!!

then again what he might be saying is that there isn't enough torque to produce adequate power in a rev range suitable for day-to-day driving. 200bhp from a bike engine @ 14k is nice to some ears but usually not for long.....

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
owelly

posted on 30/10/08 at 06:58 PM Reply With Quote
But he was talking about engine choices for an MG Midget...........





http://www.ppcmag.co.uk

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.