Jon Ison
|
| posted on 23/4/05 at 07:31 PM |
|
|
keeping a low profile on this one but if you read the link again you will see there seems to be summat a miss. There as been a few more replys since i
posted the link.
[Edited on 23/4/05 by Jon Ison]
|
|
|
|
|
Alez
|
| posted on 25/4/05 at 06:24 AM |
|
|
The manufacturer of the chassis has now replied, it is a Dominator.
Cheers,
Alex
|
|
|
tks
|
| posted on 1/5/05 at 06:23 PM |
|
|
...just what i said....
was it build for what they wanted..??
another thing is offcourse that a bit of manufacture know what is strong and what is weak... i meen...a diff that ones to go his own way..
doesn't sound promising..
i would like to see pics of the chasis to judge if it was "just" close to hold the forces or it was a no no action..
TKS
The above comments are always meant to be from the above persons perspective.
|
|
|
G.Man
|
| posted on 6/10/05 at 10:21 AM |
|
|
Sorry for the bump on this, but was wondering if anyone knows what happened in this case...
Looked to me like the problem was the way in which the transaxle was braced to the engine, an issue that crops up a lot in large engine karts (250cc
etc)...
The guy building was a total numptie in terms of where and how he spent money on this project...
Cant believe he got a sponsor when he hasnt even raced....
Looks like I have found out...
http://www.bikecars.co.uk/Forum/topic.asp?intMessageID=2391
[Edited on 6/10/05 by G.Man]
Opinions are like backsides..
Everyone has one, nobody wants to hear it and only other peoples stink!
|
|
|
TimC
|
| posted on 6/10/05 at 10:31 AM |
|
|
Good question.
Am sure I saw most of the parts for sale again somewhere.
Watched the recent re-run of series on Sky, having missed the most of it previously.
Bloke way out of his depth.
|
|
|
G.Man
|
| posted on 6/10/05 at 11:55 AM |
|
|
I was more concerned about the advice he obviously hadn't received...
Or maybe he hadn't listened..
Opinions are like backsides..
Everyone has one, nobody wants to hear it and only other peoples stink!
|
|
|
