Scoobythedog
|
| posted on 22/6/09 at 01:06 PM |
|
|
Just for Cloudy , enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvX5wa5ZU3M
|
|
|
|
|
omega0684
|
| posted on 22/6/09 at 01:16 PM |
|
|
sounds a bit ropey! 
|
|
|
cloudy
|
| posted on 22/6/09 at 01:19 PM |
|
|
Thanks!
Look at it munching through that oil
Is it time for me to buy a busa for it?
James
www.warnercars.com
|
|
|
matt_gsxr
|
| posted on 22/6/09 at 01:27 PM |
|
|
what did it make during the run?
(if that isn't a rude question)
Is it early or late model (i.e. WP and WR, have less powerful cams, I believe).
I am interested, as I have the same engine in my car.
Matt
|
|
|
cloudy
|
| posted on 22/6/09 at 01:38 PM |
|
|
see end of this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rew3jG-whhc
161.7hp....
www.warnercars.com
|
|
|
matt_gsxr
|
| posted on 22/6/09 at 01:53 PM |
|
|
James,
100lb/ft torque at 7k. Not bad when an early R1 claims 71lb/ft.
Thats going to work nicely.
So this is a slightly over-bored engine.
These are damn good figures, as the early engines are rated at 155bhp, but supposedly are down on power to their later cousins (that are also rated at
155bhp). The workshop manual shows the cams to be quite different between the early and late models, which is supposedly where the difference is.
Nice work, I don't think you need a busa (no engineering challenge). What about those turbos.
Matt
|
|
|
cloudy
|
| posted on 22/6/09 at 01:59 PM |
|
|
Just need to fix this 5ml/mile drinking habit - Certainly a stem seal problem in 3 or 4 - But I'm not sure even that attributes to that much
usage!
James
www.warnercars.com
|
|
|
Danozeman
|
| posted on 22/6/09 at 07:10 PM |
|
|
The brake lights came on half way through??
Sure that cant be good for an acucrate figure?
Dan
Built the purple peril!! Let the modifications begin!!
http://www.eastangliankitcars.co.uk
|
|
|
cloudy
|
| posted on 22/6/09 at 07:23 PM |
|
|
I can't see that?
www.warnercars.com
|
|
|
