FASTdan
|
| posted on 13/2/09 at 02:53 PM |
|
|
unleaded insert
I was thinking i needed one for our mk, but i have just spotted in the CBS '09 catalogue that it is only required for engines that are post
'93.
Is this definitely the case? we;re running an '88 pinto, in which case we'd be fine 
|
NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
|
|
|
ReMan
|
| posted on 13/2/09 at 02:59 PM |
|
|
Thought it was post 95, but either way you don't need one
|
|
|
dogwood
|
| posted on 13/2/09 at 02:59 PM |
|
|
try this link
FREE THE ROADSTER ONE…!!
|
|
|
ReMan
|
| posted on 13/2/09 at 03:16 PM |
|
|
Try this link 
Link
|
|
|
matt_claydon
|
| posted on 13/2/09 at 03:26 PM |
|
|
You only have to have it if you have a catalytic converter fitted.
|
|
|
lotusmadandy
|
| posted on 13/2/09 at 03:27 PM |
|
|
I was told by the examiner that i didnt
need the insert that i had fitted to my indy
with a 93 pinto.He said no cat,no reducer.
jake_truck didnt need one with his 88 pinto
and neither did my mate dave with his 84 lump.
Andy
|
|
|
BenB
|
| posted on 13/2/09 at 03:42 PM |
|
|
I didn't need one with my 1990 PanEuro engine.....
|
|
|
Stuart_B
|
| posted on 13/2/09 at 04:37 PM |
|
|
i got told as my year off engine, i must not able to fit a dieslel nozzel in to the fuel cap. which is 30mm
stuart
|
|
|
omega 24 v6
|
| posted on 13/2/09 at 05:29 PM |
|
|
got told as my year off engine, i must not able to fit a dieslel nozzel in to the fuel cap. which is 30mm
stuart
That seems very strange given the amount of folks who make the mistake in both directions.
i.e petrol into diesel car and diesel into petrol car???????????
If it looks wrong it probably is wrong.
|
|
|
Danozeman
|
| posted on 13/2/09 at 07:17 PM |
|
|
I passed without one with a 94 engine.
As said if you need a cat (post 95) then u need one fitted. With your 88 engine you definatlet wont need one.
Dan
Built the purple peril!! Let the modifications begin!!
http://www.eastangliankitcars.co.uk
|
|
|
.jpg)
