kingr
|
posted on 3/8/04 at 12:23 PM |
|
|
Harnesses
Bit of a query for you all - I've got FIA harnesses on my car, which I'm pretty sure exceed "e" specifications, but according
to the SVA book, I need to be able to prove it. Has anyone gone through SVA with FIA harnesses, and if so, what did you have to do? I've had a
good look around but can't find any info or comparisons of the two standards.
Kingr
|
|
|
Fifer
|
posted on 3/8/04 at 03:42 PM |
|
|
Must be E marked, even though FIA eceed safety of these they wont pass.
See recent post
|
|
ned
|
posted on 3/8/04 at 03:58 PM |
|
|
If you need to prove they exceed E mark specs can you not just get hold of the standards/specs that the FIA ones are made to? If you have the e-mark
spec as a direct comparison this should be enough for the sva man surely?
Ned.
beware, I've got yellow skin
|
|
kingr
|
posted on 3/8/04 at 04:27 PM |
|
|
Yes, it's getting hold of these that are the problem though!
Kingr
|
|
Viper
|
posted on 3/8/04 at 05:08 PM |
|
|
The last time i bought an FIA harness (sparco) it came with the spec sheet, could allways contact the manufacturer.
|
|
kingr
|
posted on 4/8/04 at 08:00 AM |
|
|
Right, I've reread the rules and it would appear that they will pass, despite not having e or BS marks - in the book it's an either/or
option, either you have an e mark, or you have to fulfil certain criteria (metal parts protected from rust, certain width of straps and so on).
I'm now fairly confident that it should not be an issue.
I can transcribe the excerpt if anyone needs it.
Kingr
|
|
ady8077
|
posted on 4/8/04 at 09:18 AM |
|
|
Hi
At my SVA the examiner said they didn't have to be "e" marked, but must be to the same specs, he mentoined the one handed release
and a minimum width of the belts, 49mm i think, he was more interested in the mountings though
Adrian
|
|