andyps
|
| posted on 20/8/04 at 08:50 PM |
|
|
I think you might find that still breaks copyright laws Otherwise I might just re-type the Harry Potter books, sell them for half the price of JK
Rowlings version and make a couple of quid
Andy
An expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less
|
|
|
|
|
Chris_R
|
| posted on 20/8/04 at 09:22 PM |
|
|
Should I have attached the draft version to this thread then?
A bit of slapstick never hurt anyone.
http://www.chris.renney.dsl.pipex.com/
|
|
|
silex
|
| posted on 23/8/04 at 05:43 AM |
|
|
Well if you want to be safe on the copyright issue, don't put up an actual exact copy of the document. But moving the text into a word document
or even re-typing should be reasonable.
The government may own the SVA Manual as it is its publication, but it does not own the EEC regulations from which it is derived. That is contributed
to by all the member states and industry. As I said before - the SVA Manual is mearly an interpritation of the regs. The language is simplified to
make sense to the layman if you like. Anyone has the right to do exactly the same thing.
Harry potter is a different matter, that is the interlectual property of just one person. EEC regulations are not the property of the government.
How many of you have had trouble at the SVA test because the guy has a different take on the regulations than you or the book ?
|
|
|
DavidM
|
| posted on 23/8/04 at 10:33 PM |
|
|
I've got a manual and I've asked a question about mirrors.
|
|
|
