Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Emission Specs for pre 95 engines?
cloudy

posted on 4/3/09 at 09:21 PM Reply With Quote
Emission Specs for pre 95 engines?

Just wondered what the actual CO2/HC and test rpm's are for pre 95 engines.

Do bike engines pass this usually with a good margin? (Engine is running well with no smoke)

James

[Edited on 4/3/09 by cloudy]





www.warnercars.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Paul TigerB6

posted on 4/3/09 at 09:27 PM Reply With Quote
3.5% CO, 1200ppm HC

Noise emissions are the same as post 95 engines - 3/4 of max power rpm isnt it?






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
coozer

posted on 4/3/09 at 09:29 PM Reply With Quote
Yep 3.5% Co and 1200 HC's for my 94 zetec at SVA.

[Edited on 4/3/09 by coozer]





1972 V8 Jago

1980 Z750

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
cloudy

posted on 4/3/09 at 09:31 PM Reply With Quote
Excellent, do you remember what sort of figures the engine produced?

James





www.warnercars.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Paul TigerB6

posted on 4/3/09 at 09:35 PM Reply With Quote
Are you looking to pass SVA with a pre-95 bike engine rather than try to get your emmissions down? Looks like the noise issue you had is going to be of more concern - fit a lower revving bike engine??

Edit - i see they didnt get to test emmissions!! Plenty have passed SVA with 893 blade's etc so should be easy enough (but they rev quite high dont they for noise test!)

[Edited on 4/3/09 by Paul TigerB6]






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
cloudy

posted on 4/3/09 at 09:40 PM Reply With Quote
got noise down to 100.3 tonight with some uber restrictive cans...

James





www.warnercars.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Paul TigerB6

posted on 4/3/09 at 09:59 PM Reply With Quote
Good news then. So what's left on the SVA list to do then?? Really impressed with the build - looks fantastic






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
blakep82

posted on 4/3/09 at 10:18 PM Reply With Quote
what would it be for my '98 engine?





________________________

IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083

don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Paul TigerB6

posted on 4/3/09 at 11:53 PM Reply With Quote
200ppm HC, 0.5% CO, 0.97 - 1.03 lambda for post august 95






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
rf900rush

posted on 5/3/09 at 07:38 AM Reply With Quote
My '95 RF900 was tested at 4.5% but was just under 3.5% when tested.
Just set my tickover using a Gunson CO tester.

Engine power claimed 118bhp.

What out for 2nd gear jumping.

My option now would be to get the cheapest pre-95. fit an air box to help keep the noise down, cheap steel exhuast.
For get the power until passed.
The fit a decent engine when money allows.

I'm now freplacing my RF900 with a ZX12R.
MOT's still at 3.5%CO.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Hellfire

posted on 5/3/09 at 12:31 PM Reply With Quote
At SVA, emissions on our original 1995 Carbed Blade engine were;

CO % = 1.30
HC ppm = 488

Phil






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.