Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Reverse mechanism post-IVA
mads

posted on 17/4/09 at 10:26 AM Reply With Quote
Reverse mechanism post-IVA

So there is plenty of talk about the best type of reverse for BECs for IVA. I was just wondering where would one stand if one removed the reverse gear mechanism post-IVA?

Would it invalidate insurance? Or if you told insurance company would it be OK?

Only reason I ask is that I dont see a completely perfect solution to this problem in the near future and one which will not affect performance and weight.

Thoughts?





We gain knowledge faster than we do wisdom!

Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, thoroughly used, totally worn out and loudly proclaiming... "f*ck, what a trip!"

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
tegwin

posted on 17/4/09 at 10:30 AM Reply With Quote
Is it a requirements at MOT to have a reverse gear?.... I suspect not....





------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would the last person who leaves the country please switch off the lights and close the door!

www.verticalhorizonsmedia.tv

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
blakep82

posted on 17/4/09 at 10:31 AM Reply With Quote
what kind of reverse system do you have? why not just leave all the bits in and don't use it?

to be honest, i don't know what the problem is?





________________________

IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083

don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Miks15

posted on 17/4/09 at 10:35 AM Reply With Quote
Weight, if they were clever and just fitted a proper engine then reverse wouldnt be an issue in the first place

quote:
Originally posted by blakep82
what kind of reverse system do you have? why not just leave all the bits in and don't use it?

to be honest, i don't know what the problem is?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dangle_kt

posted on 17/4/09 at 10:37 AM Reply With Quote
I can see a club of some sort making a tidy profit from loaning out a modified caravan mover.

It sits on the top of the tyre and a roughed up shaft turns the wheel - hey presto, reverse.

If they could fabricate a simple mount that had enough adjustment to fit all IRS (which is most modern 7 kits) framed sevens they would could rent them out at £200 a pop and people would do it to remove the headache. Fit a winch type control which can have the wire routed up and over the boot cover into the "cockpit" and your laughing.

That would be a far easier option than paying more to have a starter motor mechanism fitted with all the faffing only to then have to remove it all afterwatds.

If anyone robs my idea then I want royalties, or at least a few test drives of nice cars

Patent pending and all that crap

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
blakep82

posted on 17/4/09 at 10:42 AM Reply With Quote
hmmm, but for the weight of a bike starter motor and a gear mounted to the diff? just go to the toilet before you go for a drive. that'll balance out the weight

quote:
Originally posted by Miks15
Weight, if they were clever and just fitted a proper engine then reverse wouldnt be an issue in the first place

quote:
Originally posted by blakep82
what kind of reverse system do you have? why not just leave all the bits in and don't use it?

to be honest, i don't know what the problem is?







________________________

IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083

don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
peteday_uk@btinternet.com

posted on 17/4/09 at 10:45 AM Reply With Quote
I can't see why you would want to remove it afterwards. Gone to all the trouble of fitting it, and how much will it really weigh? Can't see it being as heavy as having a car engine and gearbox in there. So i still think it will be lighter than a CEC. Anyway I shouldn't say anything about CEC v BEC as I am building a BEC but have never driven either.

Pete.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Humbug

posted on 17/4/09 at 10:49 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dangle_kt
I can see a club of some sort making a tidy profit from loaning out a modified caravan mover.

It sits on the top of the tyre and a roughed up shaft turns the wheel - hey presto, reverse.

If they could fabricate a simple mount that had enough adjustment to fit all IRS (which is most modern 7 kits) framed sevens they would could rent them out at £200 a pop and people would do it to remove the headache. Fit a winch type control which can have the wire routed up and over the boot cover into the "cockpit" and your laughing.

That would be a far easier option than paying more to have a starter motor mechanism fitted with all the faffing only to then have to remove it all afterwatds.

If anyone robs my idea then I want royalties, or at least a few test drives of nice cars

Patent pending and all that crap


Funnily enough I was talking to the lass on the MEV stand at Detling about the Atomic, which is R1-engined and asked about reverse. She said they use a winch motor - not sure how/where it is mounted, though.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dangle_kt

posted on 17/4/09 at 11:02 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by peteday_uk@btinternet.com
I can't see why you would want to remove it afterwards. Gone to all the trouble of fitting it, and how much will it really weigh? Can't see it being as heavy as having a car engine and gearbox in there. So i still think it will be lighter than a CEC. Anyway I shouldn't say anything about CEC v BEC as I am building a BEC but have never driven either.

Pete.


wear dark trouser on your first outing then

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Richard Quinn

posted on 17/4/09 at 11:06 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Humbug
quote:
Originally posted by Dangle_kt
I can see a club of some sort making a tidy profit from loaning out a modified caravan mover.

It sits on the top of the tyre and a roughed up shaft turns the wheel - hey presto, reverse.

If they could fabricate a simple mount that had enough adjustment to fit all IRS (which is most modern 7 kits) framed sevens they would could rent them out at £200 a pop and people would do it to remove the headache. Fit a winch type control which can have the wire routed up and over the boot cover into the "cockpit" and your laughing.

That would be a far easier option than paying more to have a starter motor mechanism fitted with all the faffing only to then have to remove it all afterwatds.

If anyone robs my idea then I want royalties, or at least a few test drives of nice cars

Patent pending and all that crap


Funnily enough I was talking to the lass on the MEV stand at Detling about the Atomic, which is R1-engined and asked about reverse. She said they use a winch motor - not sure how/where it is mounted, though.
Perhaps you just pull the cable out through the rear of the vehicle, attach to a convenient tree/post etc, flick the switch et voila you're reversing

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
blakep82

posted on 17/4/09 at 11:17 AM Reply With Quote
^ lol would that be allowed? wonder what Mr Iva would say to that





________________________

IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083

don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
iank

posted on 17/4/09 at 12:33 PM Reply With Quote
An interesting point with the insurance company angle. If you declared it, and they loaded the premium appropriately, then you should be fine assuming the MOT doesn't mention it (and isn't modified to require reverse after some registration date).

However if you didn't declare the removal then I'd expect them to use it as a reason not to pay out. This would be certain if the accident was caused, in part, due to not having a reverse gear.

To be honest I find the safety aspect pretty compelling, and why it's required in F1 and afaik most motorsport where multiple cars are competing on the same track. If I ever build a BEC it will have reverse fitted permanently.

Simple example, you over cook a damp (patch of diesel if you want) blind bend and end up nose first against a stone wall. Car comes round the corner 2 mins later after you've got out to push it back. Any insurance company will decide not having reverse contributed to the accident and use it as an excuse not to pay if they can.





--
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Anonymous

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.