scudderfish
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 08:44 AM |
|
|
So when will Prince Charles get a NIP in the post
As his car was driven with an illegal rear number plate?
|
|
|
lotusmadandy
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 08:49 AM |
|
|
I Wondered that myself.
The car that William travelled to his wedding in,didnt even have any plates on
Andy
|
|
scootz
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 08:50 AM |
|
|
He won't...
It's Evolution Baby!
|
|
Thinking about it
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 08:56 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by scudderfish
As his car was driven with an illegal rear number plate?
And none of them were wearing seat belts.
|
|
BigFaceDave
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 09:00 AM |
|
|
I believe if the car is state owned then they dont need number plates its only private and company vehicles that are required to have number plates
(basically eveything exept the queens / royals stuff) so maybe the state own the aston I could be wrong but that was my understanding of it. Must make
taxing it online tricky!
|
|
jabs
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 09:02 AM |
|
|
None of them had tax disks anyway. Do they need insurance?
|
|
StevieB
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 09:11 AM |
|
|
Regardless of whether the car's state owned or not, I imagine there's a dispensation so that his number plate wasn't on display to
the billions of people round the world watching on TV.
Very nice car though!
|
|
Guinness
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 09:19 AM |
|
|
I think on days like that it really does become "The Queens Highway".
|
|
Triton
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 09:21 AM |
|
|
Cracking car and the lad has got style as he rides(no doubt surrounded by armed guards) a Ducati....
My Daughter has taken over production of the damn fine Triton race seats and her contact email is emmatrs@live.co.uk.
www.tritonraceseats.com
www.hairyhedgehog.com
|
|
scudderfish
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 09:35 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by StevieB
Regardless of whether the car's state owned or not, I imagine there's a dispensation so that his number plate wasn't on display to
the billions of people round the world watching on TV.
Very nice car though!
The front plate looked legit.
|
|
scootz
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 09:41 AM |
|
|
Had to laugh at the wishy-washy Beeb commentary at that point... "and isn't it nice to see them out and about without any
security".
I'm guessing you've not noticed the whacking-great Range Rover driving 3-feet behind them with a PPO and 3 back-up!
Or all the armed uniforms standing between them and the crowd!
It's Evolution Baby!
|
|
Dangle_kt
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 10:32 AM |
|
|
doubt it will be insured.
I'm pretty sure you only need insurance if you cant afford to pay up to £Xm.
The state can.
|
|
PSpirine
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 10:36 AM |
|
|
The state under-write themselves.
As do large companies for their prototype/testing cars.
*ETA: Slow computer - basically what Dangle said!
[Edited on 30/4/11 by PSpirine]
|
|
balidey
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 11:06 AM |
|
|
bottom line is... Hes in line for the thrown, its his wedding day. Who honestly gives a flying F that he has that rear number plate? Surely there are
more important things to moan about
Dutch bears have terrible skin due to their clogged paws
|
|
coozer
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 11:08 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by balidey
bottom line is... Hes in line for the thrown, its his wedding day. Who honestly gives a flying F that he has that rear number plate? Surely there are
more important things to moan about
Seconded that man, we need to be proud of our heritage.
1972 V8 Jago
1980 Z750
|
|
stevegough
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 11:19 AM |
|
|
EBY776J was 'not found' on the DVLA website enquiry.
Luego Locost C20XE.
Build start: October 6th 2008.
IVA passed Jan 28th 2011.
First drive Feb 10th 2011.
First show: Stoneleigh 1st/2nd May 2011.
'Used up' first engine may 3rd 2011!
Back on the road with 2nd engine may 24th
First PASA mad drive 26/7/11
Sold to Mike in Methyr Tydvil 19/03/14
|
|
SteveWalker
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 12:40 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lotusmadandy
I Wondered that myself.
The car that William travelled to his wedding in,didnt even have any plates on
Andy
I heard it referred to as RR1 and with the high windows etc. it's one of the Queen's cars. ISTR that the monarch is the only person in the
UK not required to display a registration plate, so there was no problem there.
SteveW
|
|
eddie99
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 12:45 PM |
|
|
I think it was great to see william driving himself.... great to see in such a lovely aston.... and as above... who cares about the plates
http://www.elitemotorsporteng.co.uk/
Twitter: @Elitemotoreng
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Elite-Motorsport-Engineering/153409081394323
|
NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
|
blakep82
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 01:08 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by scootz
Had to laugh at the wishy-washy Beeb commentary at that point... "and isn't it nice to see them out and about without any
security".
I'm guessing you've not noticed the whacking-great Range Rover driving 3-feet behind them with a PPO and 3 back-up!
Or all the armed uniforms standing between them and the crowd!
BBC 3 news update thing was even better
"later, the couple enjoyed some fun in a convertible"
________________________
IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083
don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!
|
|
SteveWalker
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 08:09 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by eddie99
I think it was great to see william driving himself.... great to see in such a lovely aston.... and as above... who cares about the plates
They all drive themselves when they want to. There were photos some years ago of the Queen attending a shoot - she looked a right scruffy mess and
drove herself there in a series Landrover. You've got to give her respect for that.
|
|
blakep82
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 08:20 PM |
|
|
apparently the queens quite a mechanic too, could put most of us to shame lol
________________________
IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083
don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!
|
|
MikeR
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 08:29 PM |
|
|
The car is taxed, if you watch the footage, you can see the tax disk. I suspect its marked as a special car & therefore doesn't come up when
you do a tax disk search.
I thought it was absolutely fabulous and like many things yesterday loved it. I wish them all the happiness & hope they have a long and happy life
together.
and on Tuesday I'm putting money on Harry getting to know Pippa
|
|
owelly
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 08:55 PM |
|
|
The Queen can use a vehicle with blank number plates but should still have them.The charge for not having any at all would be a civil offence, not a
motoring one, of avading prosecution or perverting the course of justice. I'm not sure that those two had any intentions of causing
trouble....
And the road traffic acts applies to 'public places'. I'm pretty certain that closing the roads and lining them with barriers and
security would make the roads fairly unpublic.
Not wearing the seat belts in the Aston? Was it fitted with any? Or did it have lap belts? Either way, I couldn't give a toss.
The only thing that would have been cooler than the Aston would have been for them to leave on the Ducati one the back wheel with her dress up round
her armpits as that's what happens if you pillion insists one wearing a dress........(he won't do that again)
http://www.ppcmag.co.uk
|
|
austin man
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 09:38 PM |
|
|
I wouldnt think that it is in the best interest of royalty to have people able to access certain information so woul not be accesible via DVLA, the
car did not require seat belts due to its age and it would also be tax exempt, it would carry a tax disc if ths where the case.
I see no one picked up that it had been converted to run on unwanted wine lol
Life is like a bowl of fruit, funny how all the weird looking ones are left alone
|
|
RK
|
posted on 30/4/11 at 10:21 PM |
|
|
Government vehicles do not have insurance. If your government cannot afford to pay for repairs in case of a prang by a royal, you have bigger problems
than that!
|
|