ned
|
| posted on 5/9/03 at 09:02 AM |
|
|
Bike taxed as a car?
I read this article this morning on the tube, couldn't make sense of how a bike can be taxed as a car.
Anyone know?!
Ned.
beware, I've got yellow skin
|
|
|
|
|
Mark H
|
| posted on 5/9/03 at 10:57 AM |
|
|
Is it a three wheeler on a solid chassis? Does that make a difference (ie like a trike).
However it does look like a bike!
Mark Harrison and
Q986 KCP back from the dead...
|
|
|
andyd
|
| posted on 5/9/03 at 02:29 PM |
|
|
I know he's a man of the cloth but that doesn't mean he's not a f***ing idiot. Even if it is classed as a car and a helmet
isn't necessary, he's an a***hole for not wearing one. Just like a bike or even a sidecar, he could still fall off that and kill himself.
Maybe he thinks that there'd be divine intervention if he was about to die! What a p***k.
Andy
|
|
|
flyingkiwi
|
| posted on 5/9/03 at 03:09 PM |
|
|
I've seen that dude going around yeovil, he's a pain in the a**e as he never goes over 20mph, even when the thing is empty, so I'm
not suprised that he thinks he doesn't need a helmet. Mind you with the way the boy racer's fly around here, you wouldn't be safe in
a tank
It Runs!!!!! Bring on the SVA!
|
|
|
stephen_gusterson
|
| posted on 5/9/03 at 06:22 PM |
|
|
heard about this on radio 5 live.
apparently if a 3 wheel bike is over a certain weight, it counts as a car.
in fact reliants must be below 400 kilos or so to qualify as trikes
atb
steve
|
|
|
