I was just wondering and I know it may be viewed as extremely ignorant but what is he difference between the "locusts" built on this site,
they all seem to be the same make-up.
I am just wondering what differences the Panther has over say a Tiger apart from the subtle body changes.
I have given up on building a single seater now because I cannot find detailed plans so I am very very interested in building a Panther so how do I go
about this.
They're all derived from the Lotus 7 space frame idea, each having their own quirks and design features. Key differences include suspension,
with older cars typically using a live rear axle and newer cars featuring independent rear suspension. A few use other setups such as de Dion, which
is kind of a mix of the other 2 types.
The term Locost refers to cars built following the Ron Champion book, How To Build A sports Car. Many are scratch built, but there are also companies
making chassis and components for people to assemble their own cars. Latterly, the Haynes Roadster updated the Locost plans with a new IRS chassis
design.
Kit cars are just that, kits made by a variety of companies to their own design, but still following the same basic idea. Each has its own look and
characteristics, some better than others. a lot comes down to personal preference and budget.
Ref. the Panther, if its still sold by GTS, you may want to read up on this forum to get a feel for it before committing. I have no direct
experience, but there does appear to be issues with customer service!
thanks for the comprehensive reply nick.
Ive heard about ron chapmans book but is that book seriously good enough to produce the same quality of cars that I have viewed on here?
I know it comes down to workmanship and each own persons design
By the way, there is a difference between "Locost" and "Locust".
What nick205 told you about is the "Locost", the Ron Champion's chassis inspired on the Lotus 7.
"Locust" is the name/reference for Lotus 7 style cars that are built on a marine plywood ladder chassis and aluminium body. I think most
used running gear from Triumph cars. I don't know much about Locusts but the "made of wood" is the distinctive factor.
Cheers,
HappyFather
There are huge differences depending on the donor vehicle
With the Sierra getting harder to find some kits have Mazda MX5 or BMW running gear
The GTS is unlikelly to be delivered as Darren is currently producing a GT40 replica and changing workshops on a too regular basis
Your best bet is to go to some club meets and go to kit car shows
quote:
Originally posted by snapper
There are huge differences depending on the donor vehicle
With the Sierra getting harder to find some kits have Mazda MX5 or BMW running gear
The GTS is unlikelly to be delivered as Darren is currently producing a GT40 replica and changing workshops on a too regular basis
Your best bet is to go to some club meets and go to kit car shows
...from the car you are building.
For some people the fun is in cobbling together a roadworthy vehicle for the cheapest price possible, making a lot of bits themselves and using scrap
parts for some noisy fun. Others want the challenge of building a super-fast racer for the road. Both are fine in their way and can stretch ingenuity
and creativity to the limit. One of the nice things about being part of the seven scene is seeing how different people make such different machines
using the same basic layout.
Cheers
Dave
Locost quality?
Show me a better built car than Fozzies locost!
quote:
Originally posted by fesycresy
Locost quality?
Show me a better built car than Fozzies locost!
quote:
Originally posted by fesycresy
Locost quality?
Show me a better built car than Fozzies locost!
Like all self built cars, there will be good ones and bad ones
As said Fozzies is nice, as is Surrey Daves, my personal favorite Locost, is mine!
Steve
thanks for replys, just wanted to add in that i never doubted the quality of cars here, what i meant is would it be possible to build a quality vehicle from ron chapmans book
quote:
Originally posted by CollegeBoy
thanks for replys, just wanted to add in that i never doubted the quality of cars here, what i meant is would it be possible to build a quality vehicle from ron chapmans book
The Panther is baically the same as what is described as locost the body work is slightly taller than book to allow for modern twin cam engines, the
rear bulkhead behing the seats is also slightly taller.
If you look in my photos you will see the chassis and then have a look at others like the MK you will see only slight differences really.
Panther uses sierra running gear and di dion axle at the rear, MK is IRS.
Unfortunately the Panther is no longer being produced, I was one of the lucky ones who's kit arrived complete and Darren always gave me good
service, but most have suffered his poor customer service.
Think mine will probabily be the last to be put on the road
quote:
Originally posted by CollegeBoy
thanks for replys, just wanted to add in that i never doubted the quality of cars here, what i meant is would it be possible to build a quality vehicle from ron chapmans book
quote:
Originally posted by CollegeBoy
thanks for replys, just wanted to add in that i never doubted the quality of cars here, what i meant is would it be possible to build a quality vehicle from ron chapmans book
quote:
Originally posted by panichat
For some people the fun is in cobbling together a roadworthy vehicle for the cheapest price possible, making a lot of bits themselves and using scrap parts for some noisy fun.