Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Problems fitting a 2.9 quick rack?
adrianreeve

posted on 22/1/10 at 08:00 AM Reply With Quote
Problems fitting a 2.9 quick rack?

I tried fitting my 2.9 quick rack from Rally Designs last night. On the thinner passenger side mounting, I fit the thick plastic spacer, but when bolted down it was still loose, and there was no room to fit the thin spacer under the wider drivers side mounting. Am I doing omething wrong, or has anyone else had this problem?

Cheers

Adrian

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
l0rd

posted on 22/1/10 at 08:58 AM Reply With Quote
Are you sure you got the correct bushes and the correct rack mounts the correct way round?
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
ashg

posted on 22/1/10 at 09:53 AM Reply With Quote
i had the same Adrian. i used a bit of 1.5mm ali under the bigger mount.

if you want you can bring your bits round mine and see if they are the same.

[Edited on 22/1/10 by ashg]





Anything With Tits or Wheels Will cost you MONEY!!

Haynes Roadster (Finished)
Exocet (Finished & Sold)
New Project (Started)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
omega0684

posted on 22/1/10 at 10:21 AM Reply With Quote
isn't 2.9 turns the standard rack? the quick racks ar e2.1 or 2.3 arn't they?





I love Pinto's, even if i did get mine from P&O!

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
adithorp

posted on 22/1/10 at 10:36 AM Reply With Quote
I think 3.5 is standard escort. RD quick racks a re 2.9 or 2.4. Although some 2.9s out there are just 3.5s with stops fitted.

adrian





"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire

http://jpsc.org.uk/forum/

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
JekRankin

posted on 22/1/10 at 12:16 PM Reply With Quote
I had exactly the same problem too - I used some thin aluminium to make shims to achieve a tight fit under the narrow mount.


The wide mount was a very tight fit - I had to file a little off the aluminum bracket and use a block of wood and a hammer to 'tap' it over the rack. I had to give it quite a few blows before I was convinced the rack was fully located in the bracket.
The plastic spacer on this side was a bit too thick so I had to file this down by about 1mm.

Jek

[Edited on 22/1/10 by JekRankin]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
flak monkey

posted on 23/1/10 at 09:49 PM Reply With Quote
Yep mine was the same, had to put some extra packing under one side (can't remember which though)

David





Sera

http://www.motosera.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Angel Acevedo

posted on 25/1/10 at 03:19 AM Reply With Quote
Slower rack with quickener

This may sound daft, but what if you install a slower rack and add a rack quickener?
This may bring rack speed to desired rate.

see:
http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=127332&page=&contribmessage=none





Beware of what you wish.. for it may come true....

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.