Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Random idea- am I going mad?
Badger_McLetcher

posted on 23/6/11 at 12:06 AM Reply With Quote
Random idea- am I going mad?

I was trying to think of alternatives to rod ends for use in suspension members that would still allow adjustment, when I had a random thought- how about a rod end with a non threaded portion to react the shear loads, yet a threaded section to allow adjustment?
Such a item could be fabricated out spherical bearing housing welded to the end of a suitable bolt (see pic below). The shear loads would be reacted by the non threaded section acting on the insert, whilst the item would be retained by nuts on the bolt and adjusted by adding shims under the head of the bolt.


Of course you'd have to be very confident of your welding (and tidy!), and the tolerances on the insert/bolt interface would need to be pretty tight, but barring that is this idea completely cuckoo?

Edit: Just seen Theshed's subject which is a similar item, I guess it could be machined out of solid, which would eliminate the welding problem.

[Edited on 23/6/11 by Badger_McLetcher]





If disfunction is a function, then I must be some kind of genius.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ReMan

posted on 23/6/11 at 05:19 AM Reply With Quote
I dont see what your gaining here, it looks like rod end to me
Surely rod ends are ok provided you spec them big enough on the threaded portion?
Sorry if im missing the point





www.plusnine.co.uk
∙،°. ˘Ô≈ôﺣ

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
designer

posted on 23/6/11 at 07:56 AM Reply With Quote
Agree, you are talking about a ball joint to me too. Just buy one.
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Kwik

posted on 23/6/11 at 08:33 AM Reply With Quote
also when you adjust it by making it longer, there is nothing stoping the bolt moving back into place... you will need a nut on both sides with 2 sets of threads...
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Theshed

posted on 23/6/11 at 09:09 AM Reply With Quote
Whether or not this sort of effort to avoid putting a threaded rod under shear loads depends on how fussy you are. You would not usually want to side load a rod with a series of little v's cut into it. Clearly worries can be addressed by going bigger and heavier but that is not the most elegant solution albeit by far the easiest. Obviously the bigger and heavier approach is perfectly fine for most folks.

There is a good article by a formula student judge on the web where he explains why he thinks loaded threads are a poor idea.

I am not convinced that a welded joint would be a huge improvement. Stop being a whimp and machine a joint from solid - it will only add a year or two to your build.....

Adjustment by shims is fairly easy to design in if you are starting from scratch. My uprights allow for camber adjustment without affecting the steering.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Badger_McLetcher

posted on 23/6/11 at 02:33 PM Reply With Quote
The idea was, as Theshed has said, to avoid putting a threaded section into shear. You could just use larger rod ends, but you've still got the thread section acting as a stress raiser.
Kwik- you'd use shims between the bolt head and insert to adjust the length.
Unfortunately Theshed I don't really have the facilities to machine this kind of thing at the moment.

Cost wise these would probably end up being more expensive, so probably not worth doing for most people. As I said, just a random late night idea





If disfunction is a function, then I must be some kind of genius.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ReMan

posted on 23/6/11 at 07:55 PM Reply With Quote
Just as a discussion point, I'm not expert, but I would have thought that putting a threaded section into shear, should be no worse than putting a plain section equal in width to the narrowest point of the thread in shear?
Presumably the threaded v is not going to have the same effect as scoring a piece of glass?





www.plusnine.co.uk
∙،°. ˘Ô≈ôﺣ

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Badger_McLetcher

posted on 23/6/11 at 08:38 PM Reply With Quote
It's rather dependant on the radius of the bottom of the thread (and so the profile of the thread itself). These points act as stress concentrators, meaning a larger section is required to counter this. You've also got to take into account fatigue with items such as this, requiring a larger safety factor.

Edit: These may explain better-

http://www.roymech.co.uk/Useful_Tables/Fatigue/Stress_concentration.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress_concentration

[Edited on 23/6/11 by Badger_McLetcher]





If disfunction is a function, then I must be some kind of genius.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Doctor Derek Doctors

posted on 24/6/11 at 04:54 PM Reply With Quote
How small are you intending to go though?

You are looking at a whole load of work, time and money to save what would amount to a maybe a few grams per rod end, possibly 1kg in total. You could probably by some lighter shoes and socks and save just as much weight.

As has been said the solution that has been reached time and time again in motorsport is to use sperical bearings and then gain the adjustment with shims. It also has the advantage (as already mentiond) of allowing you to adjust the camber without affecting the tracking.





Designer and Supplier of the T89 Designs - Single Seater Locost. Build you own Single Seater Racecar for ~£5k.

Plans and Drawings available, U2U or e-mail for details.

Available Now: The Sports Racer Add-On pack, Build a full bodied Sports Racer for Trackdays, Sprints and Racing.



www.t89.co.uk
www.racecarwings.co.uk

callan@t89.co.uk

NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.