Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Weight of IRS v live
Lightning

posted on 19/6/04 at 08:35 PM Reply With Quote
Weight of IRS v live

Just curious, what is the difference between sierra IRS and a live axle in weght terms?

Only for the fact that my Avon with a full tank (approx 28 litres) weighed 490kg with Blade engine. (without me though)

bar throwing out the seats I can see much more weight loss without resorting to expense.

Fortunatly I'm a skinny git even though 6'4" and therefore I wont add toooo much





Steve

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
JoelP

posted on 19/6/04 at 09:15 PM Reply With Quote
the most significant difference is unsprung weight, not over all weight, which might even be similar. not sure. depends on the rear uprights i suspect.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 20/6/04 at 07:20 AM Reply With Quote
More variation between different weights of live axle-
An "english" MK1 Escort style banjo axle is a lot lighter than the salsbury "atlas" style axle from a 2 litre Cortina.

With english axles you can also get a light alloy diff carrier to cut the unsprung weight even more.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Fifer

posted on 20/6/04 at 11:26 AM Reply With Quote
My X Flow with IRS just SVA'd came in at 560 dead with full tank of fuel
How does this compare with other non bike engined cars ?

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
derf

posted on 20/6/04 at 02:31 PM Reply With Quote
Like JoelP said, sprung vs unsprung weight is the key, they probably weigh similar on the scales, but when you are out driving the setup with less weight that is just hanging there (a full axle vs axle carriers), can greatly improve handling, if done right. A live axle has an advantage, it keeps the wheels parralell to the ground at all times, but is heavy and cannot react to the suspensions needs to move as fast, IRS is lighter and will be able to keep up with changes in the road surface better, but if they are designed incorrectly will not keep the maximum tire patch on the road and you will lose traction. A good compromise is the dedion axle, especially for hommeade cars, it is simple enough to do at home, almost as it has less unsprung weight as a live axle, and will keep the wheels at the right position in relation to the ground at all times.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
pbura

posted on 20/6/04 at 07:01 PM Reply With Quote
Table of car weights here:

http://www.fluke-motorsport.co.uk/weight/complete.html





Pete

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
stressy

posted on 21/6/04 at 07:44 PM Reply With Quote
live axle vs dedion vs irs

Having considered this in the past i came up with the following which you may find helpful. The numbers are from my own measurements and calculations plus other peoples supplied info, so accuracy is not 100%.

live axle
axle casing inc brackets, standard diff, trailing and lateral links, coilovers, prop, brakes.
unsprung 56kg / sprung 7kg / total 63kg

dedion
std diff, trailing links, coilovers,lateral linkage, disc brakes and calipers,driveshafts and joints (narrow), propshaft, dedion tube an alloy ears
unsprung 37kg / sprung 37kg / total total 74kg

IRS
std diff, driveshafts, hubs/uprights(alloy), wisbones (std bushes), brakes, coilovers, propshaft, additional chassis work
unsprung 37kg / spung 46kg / total 83kg

Hopefully this is of some help.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
derf

posted on 21/6/04 at 08:45 PM Reply With Quote
Like I said earlier, a properly done IRS will provide better lap times, it will just handle better and be able to keep up with the changing road surface. Although I dont see how the dedion and the IRS weigh the same.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
JoelP

posted on 21/6/04 at 09:16 PM Reply With Quote
nice example stressy.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.