Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
<<  1    2  >>
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Dax Camber Compensation/Anti-Roll system
Peteff

posted on 8/1/07 at 06:48 PM Reply With Quote
They would say that, but

The Dax system is not a practical diy proposition according to the guy I was talking to on their stand. The accuracy of the manufacture is one of the factors that makes it work and to implement it on a vehicle with different measurements would require it to be completely reworked. It looked to depend on the springing being overly stiff to me.





yours, Pete

I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Liam

posted on 8/1/07 at 11:20 PM Reply With Quote
RE: the nik link...

Oooh I see! That's clever. Never seen it before. Like it! Increased damper stroke per unit wheel movement, ride height independant of shock preload, and anti-roll. Only downside is the arb isn't adjustable as it is in that picture, though i'm sure it could be done if needed. And just to be picky i'd call them pushrods as opposed to pullrods, nat, since if i understand it right they are always loaded in compression

RE: the Dax system

I think this is pretty clever myself too. The base wishbone geometry is essentially halfway between no camber change (parallel and equal) and full camber change=roll. In bump/droop the linkage cancels the camber change giving the behaviour of parallel equal wishbones, and in roll the linkage adds camber change to fully match roll angle. To get it actually doing this takes some serious geometry/analysis and precision fabbing, and would be a nightmare for a DIYer


I disagree with Syd's comments in this case. What's good for F1 or other top end racers isn't necessarily good for a road/track car. Similarly things that aren't used in racing aren't necessarily a waste of time. Cars that actually have suspension travel could (and do) benefit from systems like the above.

Liam

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Uphill Racer

posted on 9/1/07 at 12:14 AM Reply With Quote
U got it Liam...........the suspension works great, now can anyone throw numbers as to how the nik-link works?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
procomp

posted on 9/1/07 at 08:00 AM Reply With Quote
Hi regarding the dax system. At the end of the day dose it actually give any better results in handeling than a conventional setup simalar to the locost when optimised.

Cheers matt

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Syd Bridge

posted on 9/1/07 at 08:19 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Liam
........................
I disagree with Syd's comments in this case. What's good for F1 or other top end racers isn't necessarily good for a road/track car. Similarly things that aren't used in racing aren't necessarily a waste of time. Cars that actually have suspension travel could (and do) benefit from systems like the above.
Liam


There ARE cars that race that have significant suspension travel. Never seen this system anywhere but on a Dax!

Cheers,
Syd.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
<<  1    2  >>
New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.