piran
|
posted on 5/4/09 at 05:49 PM |
|
|
SVA Fail Birmingham
My Vindi family sprint
went in for it's SVA on Thursday and failed - but all on pretty trivial stuff :
The handbrake was good enough for an MOT but not for SVA...
The reflectors on the back were triangular - and they're only allowed on trailers
some extra fastenings needed on a couple of cables, etc.
well chuffed that there wasn't anything more serious !
|
|
|
twybrow
|
posted on 5/4/09 at 06:04 PM |
|
|
Thats great news - you should be on the road in no time! They are a nice bunch up there aren't they!?
|
|
piran
|
posted on 5/4/09 at 06:10 PM |
|
|
I must admit that since this was the first family sprint to go through SVA I got vindicator to take it in for me - but the feedback I got was the
birmingham SVA peeps were very helpful.
|
|
stevebubs
|
posted on 5/4/09 at 06:32 PM |
|
|
All lgood stuff.
May I make a suggestion for a post SVA mod?
If you added another section onto the cage to bring it forward and then angled down to the scuttle as per a full locost cage, then this would take
away a lot of the "square and boxy" look for the car...and have the added benefit of making the fun family car a little safer.
[Edited on 5/4/09 by stevebubs]
|
|
piran
|
posted on 5/4/09 at 06:39 PM |
|
|
hmm good point - I'll consider that
|
|
speedyxjs
|
posted on 5/4/09 at 07:40 PM |
|
|
Thats an easy fix. You'll be otr in no time.
Iv never seen a 'family' seven before, have you got any more piccys?
|
|
piran
|
posted on 5/4/09 at 07:52 PM |
|
|
boot (extra seating potential):
Rover 2 litre turbo power:
outside (before the interior went in):
this is all I've got online at the moment, but it's going through as a 5 seater (and SVA were fine with that !) and has more legroom in
the back than any production car I've been in.
|
|
Vindi_andy
|
posted on 5/4/09 at 08:12 PM |
|
|
We are also building a Sprint Family - ours goes to SVA on 23 April. We are doing ours as a 4 seater rather than 5. Pictures on our build web site
for anyone interested http://sites.google.com/site/lawsvindicatorfamily/
Well done Piran - lets hope all three of the families are on the road soon. Unfortunately we cannot get the car to John as no tow bar on either car -
so driving to SVA outselves. If we can get the damn thing started. Having trouble at the mo.
[Edited on 5/4/09 by Vindi_andy]
|
|
piran
|
posted on 5/4/09 at 10:07 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Vindi_andy
We are also building a Sprint Family - ours goes to SVA on 23 April. We are doing ours as a 4 seater rather than 5. Pictures on our build web site
for anyone interested http://sites.google.com/site/lawsvindicatorfamily/
Well done Piran - lets hope all three of the families are on the road soon. Unfortunately we cannot get the car to John as no tow bar on either car -
so driving to SVA outselves. If we can get the damn thing started. Having trouble at the mo.
[Edited on 5/4/09 by Vindi_andy]
Good luck for you too - I hope you get it going !
It was certainly a relief to find that it failed on such minor items, mind you I hadn't heard the one about not having triangular reflectors
before !?
|
|
Vindi_andy
|
posted on 6/4/09 at 09:36 AM |
|
|
Id heard about the reflectors before.
You are only allowed round or square on a car. although I have seen hand shaped ones for sale.
|
|
piran
|
posted on 6/4/09 at 10:38 AM |
|
|
and how many production cars have odd shaped reflectors these days ?
|
|
Vindi_andy
|
posted on 6/4/09 at 10:57 AM |
|
|
ours is not to reason why. lol
We have a set of rules that we have to conform to and the mainstream production cars have a different set of rules and they pay a damn site more than
we do
|
|
adithorp
|
posted on 6/4/09 at 11:59 AM |
|
|
The only stipulation on refletor shape is Not Triangular. Pretty clear in the manual. Any other shape is allowed.
adrian
"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire
http://jpsc.org.uk/forum/
|
|
Vindi_andy
|
posted on 6/4/09 at 02:49 PM |
|
|
ok thanks adithorpe.
I havent got triangular ones anyway or wavy hand ones. I have the outer ring for my fog and reversing lights as reflectors using the hella mix and
match style from SVC and very nice they look too
|
|
piran
|
posted on 6/4/09 at 05:22 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by adithorp
The only stipulation on refletor shape is Not Triangular. Pretty clear in the manual. Any other shape is allowed.
adrian
my bad then - I missed that one, and the bit about the HT leads needing to have the manfacturer etc. printed on it.
|
|
t16turbotone
|
posted on 6/4/09 at 05:29 PM |
|
|
well done mate....didnt think ide see another T series turbo engine install
|
|
piran
|
posted on 2/5/09 at 05:57 PM |
|
|
got the retest on Wednesday but the people who were sorting it for me can't get the engine started now that they've changed the HT leads -
giving me some guff about it being the immobiliser
|
|
Vindi_andy
|
posted on 5/5/09 at 12:04 PM |
|
|
Good luck Piran,
Hope they get it started now they are back from stoneleigh.
Be good to have another family on the road. Hopefully mine will be by the weekend got DVLA examination Friday just had to organise Trailer and van
with towbar as I dont have one on either of the daily drivers an extra £43 grrrr
|
|
piran
|
posted on 5/5/09 at 01:02 PM |
|
|
they got her started so we're on for retest tomorrow!
turned out one of the new HT leads was loose ....
|
|
Vindi_andy
|
posted on 5/5/09 at 02:15 PM |
|
|
Hmmmm back to basics springs to mind
|
|
piran
|
posted on 5/5/09 at 02:20 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Vindi_andy
Hmmmm back to basics springs to mind
yes, I mean to me it seems obvious that if you change something and the car stops working then change it back and see if the problem goes away, my
first reaction wouldn't be to call in an "expert" so goes off on a tangent about it being a non existent immobiliser kicking
in....
[Edited on 6/5/09 by piran]
|
|